- Joined
- Jan 24, 2016
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 25
Are retrospective chart reviews (clinical setting) considered research for top tier schools?
I have three publications (retrospective chart reviews) in reputable peer-reviewed urology journals. Would this satisfy as significant research for top tier schools or should I also get some bench experience.
I can either continue garnering retrospective chart review publications or get some bench lab work (probably no publication). Which should I do?
I have three publications (retrospective chart reviews) in reputable peer-reviewed urology journals. Would this satisfy as significant research for top tier schools or should I also get some bench experience.
I can either continue garnering retrospective chart review publications or get some bench lab work (probably no publication). Which should I do?