- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,061
- Reaction score
- 1,772
- Points
- 5,476
- Attending Physician
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I have been using Berkeley Review for PS. I must say I have been extremely confused by the reasoning used to answer some of the questions. I am specifically talking about Physics, I was taught to approach physics problem in a pretty standard way but TBR uses a whole different approach. I get most of the questions right, however, when I go through the answers, I feel like I know less than I knew before. Further, some of the questions are worded entirely differently then what I have seen in TPR, Kaplan, and AAMC exams. I wonder if anyone is having a similar problem. As the big day approaches, I am getting very scared.
To people who prepared for PS using TBR (bozz, Vihsadas), did you feel the same way? Also, in each chapter exams, I have been scoring >12 according to the scale provided by TBR. But that's not saying much as anything above 52/70 is a 12 or higher. I usually get at least 10 questions wrong in each exam. Does this sound like I am making some progress? How have other people fared? How did that translate to the real MCAT? Some one please help!!!
To people who prepared for PS using TBR (bozz, Vihsadas), did you feel the same way? Also, in each chapter exams, I have been scoring >12 according to the scale provided by TBR. But that's not saying much as anything above 52/70 is a 12 or higher. I usually get at least 10 questions wrong in each exam. Does this sound like I am making some progress? How have other people fared? How did that translate to the real MCAT? Some one please help!!!
