I got more than one new patient who got told they had ADHD by Done but the initial eval was dodgy enough that they were like, 'huh, I'm not sure if I buy it.'
I wonder who flipped or blew the whistle. Either these guys were just incredibly dumb and put a lot of stuff in writing that should never be written down or they've got a witness with significant access.
If you read the summary of the indictment this was pretty egregious on a number of levels. If they had even vaguely gestured towards actual medical care I don't think we'd be seeing this.
Things not to do as a telehealth company:
1) Require all initial evaluations be less than 30 minutes regardless of complexity
2) Tell clinicians to prescribe Adderall even if patient does not meet criteria for ADHD
3) Refuse to pay clinicians for any follow-up visits or further evaluations of any kind
4) Automatically generate refill requests without any patient input for a schedule II substance
5) Pay clinicians based solely on how many prescriptions they write
6) Using a subscription model while avoiding any interactions beyond the initial evaluation, just mail the scripts, never follow up
7) Lie a bunch to pharmacies and CMS
8) Start shredding documents when a subpoena is announced targeting another telehealth company.
Really, if they had even tried to make it look legit, I expect they'd be fine.