Recently overheard a cards fellow saying that she's going to submit to JACC and then Circulation on reject. My cards groups in undergrad and med school always preferred Circulation, JACC, EHJ and on (after NEJM/JAMA/BMJ hail marys) for potentially high-impact studies. Have things changed in the past 5 years that JACC is now seen as superior? I'm going into rads so this is a foreign world to me now
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
- Home
- Forums
- Physician and Resident Communities (MD / DO)
- Internal Medicine and IM Subspecialties
- Cardiology
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
JACC v. Circulation
Started by Wolf3D
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Yeah I know that. But wasn't Circ always the leader regardless? Does a change in IF really just change people's perceptions of who's the leader?JACC nowadays is the highest ranked cardiology journal in terms of impact factor. Just google the rankings
Yes. Bigger d***s are bigger.Yeah I know that. But wasn't Circ always the leader regardless? Does a change in IF really just change people's perceptions of who's the leader?
Also, why do you care if you're not in the field?
Curiosity + some. Wanted to do cards for the longest time before my medicine rotation. Also looking at a research career so trying to keep informed how things work in the world.Yes. Bigger d***s are bigger.
Also, why do you care if you're not in the field?
Thanks for the response. Very interesting
Didn't your one year at a top ten teach you anything?