Jefferson or UMich?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

phope

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
interested in the best well rounded pharm education.

pseudo-significant other in philly... and is also closer to home

what are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
interested in the best well rounded pharm education.

pseudo-significant other in philly... and is also closer to home

what are your thoughts?

I don't know much about TJ other than that it's new and has decent faculty. It probably has good rotation sites too because it's got a teaching hospital nearby with the medical school. I guess if you are concerned about money, TJ might be a better option as UofM ain't cheap. I posted this in the other Michigan thread which you might find useful if you haven't read it already:


Pros: Education here is focused towards clinical pharmacy, though about 40% of the class ends up in community practice. Your professors write the guidelines or helped to create them in their area of expertise. Therapeutics is organized so that every section has one clinical pharmacist who teaches that section, most of whom are good teachers who know how to apply the clinical knowledge to various circumstances and give you perspectives on not only to learn the guidelines, but how to apply them. There are amazing rotation sites at a world class teaching hospital, and two years of therapeutics for a strong pharmacy core knowledge. The UofM name pretty much guarantees you a residency somewhere and you will have a strong grasp of knowledge (I can't really figure out how I'm going to be proficient considering how fast I forget stuff) once you graduate. This could be a con, but all pharmacy students are required to do a PharmD research project over the course of two years, where research must be conducted, data analyzed, and summarily written like a thesis and presented before a committee. Works wonders for residency applications as well as juggling projects once in the respective programs. The curriculum here really is quite immaculate and well thought out after many years of trial and error, even if it isn't always successful in teaching you all that it was designed to on paper.

There's an automatic alumni scholarship for your 3rd and 4th years (out of state gets 7k each year, instate gets around 4-5?). The city is also quite affluent and a liberal bastion in the middle of nowhere. There's a lot of great bar scenes, crazy people when football comes around, and nice restaurants for those who like to spend $$. You also get 4 months off during EVERY summer.

Cons: It's really cold and expensive: i pay ~34k a year in out of state tuition though the school is much more open to admitting nonresidents at around 30-40% of every class. Therapeutics is structured so that you'll have to memorize all these nuances and details that no one would ever really retain in practice, but I suppose that's in the spirit of 'being a good clinician' in being able to make the decisions given a certain set of information. Critical thinking and judgment is an annoying skill that takes time to learn where some pick it up faster than others. Brute memorization won't really work anymore. Pharmacology is taught by Old Relics in the medical school who love making you learn a lot of random/nonsensical information where you'd probably never be able to pass an exam with unless you had the 10+ years of old exams in the Ctools test bank. The P1 year also doesn't really do much as it's just an easy year of prerequisites so you feel like you're wasting your time in never learning any pharmacy. The P2 year really picks up and is relentless in the amount of work and time commitment compared to the first year. So much for bars 3-4x a week. I also hear the P3 year is the worst because the difficulty of therapeutics just amplifies to another level with topics such as infectious disease and cardiology.

Also, you only have time for electives in your P3 year, as therapeutics absorbs most of the material that you would take as an elective in other schools. You also have to take non-health related electives in order to graduate. Another con is that every year a certain number (a couple maybe?) are held back because of the rigors of the curriculum. You'd think that after all the gatekeeping, Michigan would be trying to retain its students, but by putting the bar so high a lot of people actually end up repeating classes/years and a number of people failed out. One can wonder if they had gone to an easier pharmacy school would they have made it, but speculation always says that it may have been due to a number of extraneous reasons such as pharmacy not being a fit, personal problems and what not - and everyone likes to say that their pharmacy school is the hardest. Another pro/con is that the PharmD degree here is so comprehensive that a lot of the courses end up seemingly useless because you'll never apply everything you learned in school. As a result, you pick and choose what's important to you, but you never know, somewhere down the line you might want to switch and having the course might come in handy?

Bottom line: the education is top notch, but you're in for a ride if that's what you're looking for. This ain't no diploma mill!
 
Last edited:
I go to JSP, though you'll get a good pharm education at either school, I'd go to Michigan for national name recognition alone.
 
Never heard of Jefferson...what's unique about their program?
 
thanks for your posts, much appreciated. more questions:

teaching style:
i think at JSP they mentioned that they audio and video tape the lectures for review purposes... which would help how I learn.

how does umich teach its courses?
Does Umich tape its lectures?.. just curious

rotations
are the rotation sites set up for you?
is there a choice?

for those rotation sites at UMich that may require a car, can those sites be done at home (since i am out-of-state?)

is the car absolutely required?

Specific
confettiflyer, any other reasons that would have convinced you not to go to JSP, b/c i adored my visit there... speaking on behalf of your class, if you had the option of JSP vs Umich where would you go? (since you are a JSP student.)

how important is name recognition?

does your school (umich or JSP students) prepare you well for all aspects of pharmacy? clinical, industry etc?

I know at JSP they have simulations where you take the vitals etc etc, is something similar at Umich?

many thanks!
 
confettiflyer, any other reasons that would have convinced you not to go to JSP, b/c i adored my visit there... speaking on behalf of your class, if you had the option of JSP vs Umich where would you go? (since you are a JSP student.)

many thanks!

I really like my school, its extensive hospital network has already benefited me directly + lots of my other classmates; its faculty was lifted directly from USP across the river, the medical college, and the hospital, so we have fantastic lecturers. Yes, our lectures are recorded and paired with the powerpoint presentations, so I was able to take extended weekends fall semester and download the lectures to stay up to date.

The only reason I wouldn't go to JSP is if I had an acceptance to a "nationally known" and/or ranked program (ie UMich, any california school except that one stand alone in sacramento or touro, etc...). I know nothing of UMich's program and its specifics, so it really is just about name. Jefferson's name carries along the eastern seaboard, but since I plan to return to CA, I would want a name that is familiar to DoP's in CA.

Also, I'm not a fan of the urban environment of JSP, but compared to the area around Temple, this area is a total oasis. I feel like I would have enjoyed Ann Arbor vs. Philadelphia (personal preference).
 
thanks evilolive, the cost is probably ~4000 more at umich. then theres the flights etc. whereas at JSP, travel woudln't be as costly. but at this point, the decision will have to be made on which program will be the better choice.

i see you are going to be a P3? congrats on the first 2 years =)
what to you makes umich the school to go to (students, rigor etc etc)? are you from michigan or out-of state?
 
Specific
confettiflyer, any other reasons that would have convinced you not to go to JSP, b/c i adored my visit there... speaking on behalf of your class, if you had the option of JSP vs Umich where would you go? (since you are a JSP student.)

how important is name recognition?

does your school (umich or JSP students) prepare you well for all aspects of pharmacy? clinical, industry etc?

I know at JSP they have simulations where you take the vitals etc etc, is something similar at Umich?

many thanks!

Dang it, you updated your post...haha. Name recognition is/isn't important....anytime I go home, I have explain what the heck jefferson is/where it is. When I mention it around here, people assume I'm a medical student (haha). Since I haven't gone through the hiring/match process, I can't comment on name recognition...I just personally feel it is important.

JSP -- I got thrown into a clinic within 2 weeks of starting P-1 this past fall semester. Man, it was like throwing me into a swimming pool. As for clinical preparedness...I'm able to spar with my parents who are in health care, so it looks like what we're learning is relevant.

Also, I was watching a documentary on TV and the practitioners were doing things that we had to do/calculate in cases/labs. We got creatnine clearance/framingham risk drilled into us all year long...guess what, a) a pharmacist in the pharm subforum was appalled that one of his students couldn't even list ONE thing that went into CrCl, b) that alzheimer's documentary had a little thing about framingham risk, i got so excited, i turned up the TV.

This could be the case at other programs, my friends at USC/UCSF essentially get the same thing....so assuming UMich prepares you similarly, I would have gone there for CA name recognition. Now, if you plan to return to the east coast for residency/employment, JSP's name carries regionally, that's something else to consider.
 
what is start and end dates for both schools? are the summer experiences left up to you?
 
confettiflyer, thank you for your thoughtful posts. this is a tough decision, personally speaking.

i will likely have more questions. thanks in advance.
 
any thoughts on where to go?

please let me know about each:
program
teaching style (different ways of teaching?)
rotation choices (on campus or back in home state?)
need for car?
clinical preparation etc
post grad opportunities

what sets each school apart? what makes each school worth it?

JSP is closer to family/pseudo significant other

many thanks in advance!
 
what is start and end dates for both schools? are the summer experiences left up to you?

no prob

we started around labor day and ended the 1st week of may w/ a 3-4 week winter break and a 1 week spring break.

your summers are wide open after P-1 and P-2, rotations begin after P-3 straight away (this is most schools).

If you're talking about IPPE's, you are placed, and taken care of, by the school each semester. Some other schools leave you to your own devices with regards to IPPE experiences.
 
does Umich have clinical experiences in the first 3 years?
 
thoughts from any other JSP student and/or Umich students/alumni? thanks!
 
not sure if this was sarcasm?

any thoughts from current pharmd students and current pharmDs woudl be much appreciated!

thank u!
 
Yes, it was sarcasm.

Michigan is one of the top universities in the country: law, medicine, dental, pharm, etc.

From the website, Michigan has trained pharmacists for 100+ years. If I recall correctly, TJ is only one or two years old?

TJ is likely a quality school, but this would be an easy choice for me.

Michigan out of state tuition is roughly 34,000/year.
 
The best choice would be neither or if you do enroll in one -- go to their med school.
 
I don't know much about either school except that Michigan has a great reputations, but whatever you do, don't base your choice on a "pseudo" significant other.
 
Yes, it was sarcasm.

Michigan is one of the top universities in the country: law, medicine, dental, pharm, etc.

From the website, Michigan has trained pharmacists for 100+ years. If I recall correctly, TJ is only one or two years old?

TJ is likely a quality school, but this would be an easy choice for me.

Michigan out of state tuition is roughly 34,000/year.

OP,
Don't believe in that "one of the best pharm universities" BS. Remember, that those "rankings" are based on how much grant money university or school gets. Which has nothing to do with the quality of the program.
 
OP,
Don't believe in that "one of the best pharm universities" BS. Remember, that those "rankings" are based on how much grant money university or school gets. Which has nothing to do with the quality of the program.

Actually if you read the criteria it's based purely off of peer assessment of deans' perceptions of other pharmacy schools, and I guess indirectly so from grant money/word of mouth/encounters with other graduates of various programs. I'm not saying it's an exact system, but it gives an idea as to the relative reputation of a school. One can use the rankings to determine whether or not one will get a decent clinical education, as no one will question UNC Chapel Hill, UT, UWisc/UW, UofM's etc residents and teaching hospital quality.
 
Actually if you read the criteria it's based purely off of peer assessment of deans' perceptions of other pharmacy schools, and I guess indirectly so from grant money/word of mouth/encounters with other graduates of various programs. I'm not saying it's an exact system, but it gives an idea as to the relative reputation of a school. One can use the rankings to determine whether or not one will get a decent clinical education, as no one will question UNC Chapel Hill, UT, UWisc/UW, UofM's etc residents and teaching hospital quality.

WTF does research have to do with practical clinical practice you learn on rotations? And I'm from a relatively top tiered school, too, so I'm not just pissed that my schools ranking sucks or anything. Those rankings are just useless. USELESS. I know because my school is tied with a certain other school where I frequently encounter their students/grads...and they aren't in the same class as WVU kids...not even close, really.


Oh, and as for the OP, I'd go to Michigan. Established program > new program...always.
 
thanks for your posts, much appreciated. more questions:

how does umich teach its courses?
Does Umich tape its lectures?.. just curious

rotations
are the rotation sites set up for you?
is there a choice?

for those rotation sites at UMich that may require a car, can those sites be done at home (since i am out-of-state?)

is the car absolutely required?
how important is name recognition?
does your school (umich or JSP students) prepare you well for all aspects of pharmacy? clinical, industry etc?

I know at JSP they have simulations where you take the vitals etc etc, is something similar at Umich?

many thanks!

UofM does not currently tape its lectures, but this actually may change in the upcoming year(s). UofM teaches through traditional lecture depending on what courses you take. It's not modular compared to other schools as each course has its individual perspectives on a topic/disease state. The curriculum is structured your P1 year to give you the fundamental basics such as evidence based medicine, physiology, but most of it isn't terribly important. Most people should try to take advantage of it and take their elective credits out of the way such as immunization certification courses, or if you really wanted to, astronomy. The P2 year is designed so that each course touches on a specific topic so you see various disease states discussed in various discipline angles. You see the mechanisms of action in pharmacology via receptors, you see the structural relations of compounds to therapeutic benefit from medicinal chemistry, and you see the application of treatment in therapeutics. They all overlap at some point which makes it interesting. I appreciated that a lot. P3 year has another year of therapeutics (some schools condense everything into one year of therapeutics, we expand a lot of topics into two prior to the P4 rotations) as the mainstay of classes with a few ethics and pcare courses combined with the IPPEs.

We're taught some basics of what some nurses do, but it isn't stressed as a part of the curriculum. You usually learn them from small courses or extracurriculars taught by other professors on your own if you wish. I did get to jab one of my classmates with a needle and inject them with saline. I threw the dart in a little too far, though, and I hit the bone...

I feel that the education at Michigan is very broad, but it's clear that if you want to focus on one area, there is ample opportunity to shine. There is a clear bias as I noted in my previous post towards clinical pharmacy which is why our classes end up doing so well in placement (98% of people get their residency spots and most get within their top choices? they didn't give us a statistic for that one). Name recognition does and doesn't matter. If you're aiming to work in community pharmacy, it won't really help at all. If you do well in school regardless of where you go, residency admissions will take note of that, but many also recognize the rigors of pharmacy school. I don't know much about TJ and would defer to Confetti, but a school that generally has a teaching hospital is preferable in broad education to a stand alone institution.


thanks evilolive, the cost is probably ~4000 more at umich. then theres the flights etc. whereas at JSP, travel woudln't be as costly. but at this point, the decision will have to be made on which program will be the better choice.

i see you are going to be a P3? congrats on the first 2 years =)
what to you makes umich the school to go to (students, rigor etc etc)? are you from michigan or out-of state?

Oh so the cost will be virtually the same then if you factor in our alumni scholarships. All i can say is that school here is very stressful but it forces you to time manage. It also helps you realize what you're good at and what you're not - that much has become painfully clear. We don't really have any clinical experience until the third year. You go do patient counseling in labs, you meet up with your community partner to practice taking med histories, medication therapy management (MTM), counseling and role playing with the actors (which by the way are very cool. one thing that I learned from my actor is to never say but, just say and. saying but always makes people mad as if you're not helping them, but everyone is always caught off guard when I tell them "your organization is very good, and i would like to help you improve on a few key aspects of it"; works like a charm for constructive criticism).

The quality of life on campus is spectacular though. I really like wasting my money on the expensive restaurants that are down the street from where I live. I'm an out of state student and just finished up my P2 year. There are recruiters that come to campus from various retail pharmacies to help people get summer internships, which is nice. There are also a couple of programs at UofM that take on summer interns as well either by doing research, doing the PharmD project, or by working at the hospital.
 
WTF does research have to do with practical clinical practice you learn on rotations? And I'm from a relatively top tiered school, too, so I'm not just pissed that my schools ranking sucks or anything. Those rankings are just useless. USELESS. I know because my school is tied with a certain other school where I frequently encounter their students/grads...and they aren't in the same class as WVU kids...not even close, really.


Oh, and as for the OP, I'd go to Michigan. Established program > new program...always.

I don't know. Association with smarts of clinicians discovering new things therefore must make rotations more exciting? The US news peer assessment doesn't really incorporate research specifically into the methodology. It just asks something to the effect of "do you like this pharmacy school? rank 1-5". I don't know what individual deans use to make their judgment calls, but I'm certain that this is how the peer assessment score is done. They're asked to weigh things such as interaction with graduates, knowledge of specific programs/strengths of residency and clinicians, etc. I can't seem to find the source on the website, but I remember reading it somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Actually if you read the criteria it's based purely off of peer assessment of deans' perceptions of other pharmacy schools, and I guess indirectly so from grant money/word of mouth/encounters with other graduates of various programs. I'm not saying it's an exact system, but it gives an idea as to the relative reputation of a school. One can use the rankings to determine whether or not one will get a decent clinical education, as no one will question UNC Chapel Hill, UT, UWisc/UW, UofM's etc residents and teaching hospital quality.

It still wouldn't convince me. It's still very subjective. In my mind, the most objective criteria is first try passing percentage of NAPLEX.
 
It still wouldn't convince me. It's still very subjective. In my mind, the most objective criteria is first try passing percentage of NAPLEX.

Well everyone passes the NAPLEX with on average 90+%, so it really isn't a good indicator at all of whether or not that makes you a good pharmacist. It's just the very basic proficiencies. My own preference would be having a teaching hospital. That most of the time ensures that you get a well rounded education, and you'll find that most of the so-called "high" ranking schools have one as an adjunct nearby. Quality rotations sites mean everything in pharmacy.
 
Well everyone passes the NAPLEX with on average 90+%, so it really isn't a good indicator at all of whether or not that makes you a good pharmacist. It's just the very basic proficiencies. My own preference would be having a teaching hospital. That most of the time ensures that you get a well rounded education, and you'll find that most of the so-called "high" ranking schools have one as an adjunct nearby. Quality rotations sites mean everything in pharmacy.

Don't you think there is a difference between schools with 95% or lesser and 100% passing percentages? I do.
Having a teaching hospital nearby? Probably half or so schools have that, but somehow only certain schools make "the top of the crop". How? Based on that subjective BS.
More and more I feel that it doesn't matter at all whether you are gonna graduate from a top public school or a diploma mill school. Pretty much all you need to know to be able to practice pharmacy, you learn on job. Pharmacy school gives you basic theoretical knowledge, which I'm sure is similar in all schools.
And I'm not from a diploma mill school. I'm from a public school, and we are surrounded by a huge medical center, and a bunch of other hospitals which are affiliated with my school.
 
Don't you think there is a difference between schools with 95% or lesser and 100% passing percentages? I do.
Having a teaching hospital nearby? Probably half or so schools have that, but somehow only certain schools make "the top of the crop". How? Based on that subjective BS.
More and more I feel that it doesn't matter at all whether you are gonna graduate from a top public school or a diploma mill school. Pretty much all you need to know to be able to practice pharmacy, you learn on job. Pharmacy school gives you basic theoretical knowledge, which I'm sure is similar in all schools.
And I'm not from a diploma mill school. I'm from a public school, and we are surrounded by a huge medical center, and a bunch of other hospitals which are affiliated with my school.

Well I guess you're entitled to believe what you wish, I just don't see things from your perspective. The basic theoretical knowledge perhaps may be the same, but who knows if the standards and expectations are the same? Rotations aren't necessarily standardized from every school, nor will students see the same thing. I've heard of some schools sending students to spend their time at Walgreens or one small hospital for a good chunk of their rotations. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but not exactly diverse preparation. On average, you will find students from a particular "top" school better prepared than what you will get at a diploma mill - that much we can agree on. With the introduction of new schools saturating the market, I believe pharmacy will be steered towards a tiered system and make residencies more desirable. There's plenty of discussion on it in nearby threads. Some call it fearmongering, some call it market forces. Who knows? You may be right. I may be right. This is just what I observe from my own school's perspective after talking to various faculty who have been in and outside of the UofM system.
 
thank you!

any views from other JSP and umich student/alumni? many thanks in advance.
 
question: are clinical experiences/rotations only in the 4th yr at UM?

do you feel UM has the necessary preparation for clinical practice within the first three years? (seems like the basic science is solid, almost more than other schools)

is a car absolutely necessary?

are there choices for rotations?

how many of the non-campus sites can be completed elsewhere (i.e home?

what is the start and end date for the year? how do the students usually plan their summers?
 
trying to decide btwn Umich or jefferson. does it matter which one i choose for residency consideration? both have excellent teaching hospitals and likely good rotation sites/connectons i would think...

also, would not choosing one school affect chances for residency later on in that institution?

please advise.
 
Hey evil,
What do students generally do in the summer? Do they stay in MI or go back home? Internships? What did you do after your P1 year??
 
trying to decide btwn Umich or jefferson. does it matter which one i choose for residency consideration? both have excellent teaching hospitals and likely good rotation sites/connectons i would think...

also, would not choosing one school affect chances for residency later on in that institution?

please advise.

Look at the class size, the teaching faculty, and the # of residency offered at your teaching hospital.

Technically, going to the school does not give you an advantage over applicants from else where. Interviewers are not suppose to weight that into the decision process.

But having said that... in reality, yes, you have a certain amount of advantage simply because you had more opportunity to kiss, I mean interact, with the people who you'll need to impress later.

One the professors I've been interacting with for recommendations is a fellow that teaches us here. We were chatting one day, and I was picking his brain on residencies. One of the things we told me, "you know how I got in? I got to know Dr. X really well during my Pharm.D, and he told me off the record that if I apply he'll rank me as 1 so I was pretty set. I know they are not suppose to do that, but that's what can happen off the record." 🙄
 
xiphoid, do you go to JSP or UM?

i guess what i am asking is if i went to school B instead of school A, would the person at School A frown upon the fact that i turned down school A and not accept me for a residency post pharmd?
 
thanks WVU pharm 2007. so even i i absolutely adored the new Jefferson program, its teaching, integrated experiential experiences (I learn more by doing vs traditional lecture) you think I shoudl still go for the more established Um program? reasons?

many thanks in advance.
 
Where I am, there are no members of the adcom on the residency selection team. They would never know unless you told them.
 
thanks WVU pharm 2007. so even i i absolutely adored the new Jefferson program, its teaching, integrated experiential experiences (I learn more by doing vs traditional lecture) you think I shoudl still go for the more established Um program? reasons?

many thanks in advance.

If you like Jefferson more, go there. They are attached to a medical program, so its not like they are some questionable third tier school. But if it was me, I'd go to the proven, established, respected program before I went to a brand new school. They have their teaching methods, cirriculum, rotations, etc all figured out and ironed out already. The first decade of a new school is very much a work-in-progress. Whichever is the cheapest should also be a consideration.
 
Top