Kaplan Complete Subject Review 2018-19 Errata

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

stayathomemom

Now with 100% more Stay At Home™!
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
510
Reaction score
895
Has anyone else found errors not noted in their official errata? Maybe you can add them.

Behavioral Sciences review: page 76, "Merkle cells" should be "Merkel cells" and those cells don't sense "deep pressure and texture", but light touch (and possibly texture but I'm not finding any good sources stating that).

Members don't see this ad.
 
No offense, but this type of minutia is trivial. You should be doing passages and CARS instead.
Eh, you're probably not wrong. I've worked as a copy editor before and it just irks me when I see errors.
However, after over a decade out of college it's important for me to do some content review because I can't do passages without the background info. It's probably more important in the physical sciences, though.
 
Given your background, CARS probably won't be a problem for you which is good.

Try doing passages -> then reviewing what you needed to know to do well on the passage and repeating this process. After enough passages you'll have a map of what information is important. This will also save you from doing too much content review before passage work.
 
Blanking on the chapter, but there is an entire answer key that lists 'D' as the answer for every question, but than details why A, B, or C is correct.

I was irked too. haha
 
Top