- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 101
- Reaction score
- 0
Not sure if this answer is wrong or if I'm just not understanding it correctly...
In the example on page 307 of the KBB, the question asks about a parent isotope that emits a beta (-) particle, goes through gamma decay, and then goes through alpha decay. It asks you to work backwards and figure out what the original element was.
If you were working your way backwards, wouldn't you SUBTRACT one atomic number on the last one - because beta (-) means that you increase the daughter nucleus's atomic number by one.
Did I miss something? Their Solution acts like it's a beta (+) decay.
In the example on page 307 of the KBB, the question asks about a parent isotope that emits a beta (-) particle, goes through gamma decay, and then goes through alpha decay. It asks you to work backwards and figure out what the original element was.
If you were working your way backwards, wouldn't you SUBTRACT one atomic number on the last one - because beta (-) means that you increase the daughter nucleus's atomic number by one.
Did I miss something? Their Solution acts like it's a beta (+) decay.