- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
- Messages
- 678
- Reaction score
- 657
for those of you who have benzo contracts if someone violates the agreement how fast do you taper them?
Where I’m practicing we have a policy of random pill counts and uds just like opiate contracts.I don't understand your question. Are you asking how fast the taper should go? How fast you taper them depends on safety, which depends on the dosage, frequency, and half life of the medication. It's not (or shouldn't be) a punitive thing. It's a safety thing.
Or are you asking how soon after the violation do you start a taper? My answer to that would be immediately. But I don't do benzo contracts. They're pointless. I just monitor with the state monitoring program and if I see they're seeing other prescribers for benzos or stimulants that I don't know about, I tell them that I no longer feel that I can prescribe for them.
im an attending now and in residency there was much variation in recommendations like what you’ve mentioned. Typically I do a taper over several months but that was based on patient wanting to come off of them. At my current position there’s a high prevalence of opioid abuse so leaving them on benzos while abusing opioids is a safety issue and warrants a faster taper. I’ve seen others taper a dosage of 2 mg bid over two months which is way faster than I’ve ever done.You should hopefully have supervision in residency to help with this issue. I know in my own residency program, every person had a different way of tapering off benzos different from another person, and there really is no consistent recommendation other than to do so slowly.
Basically the rule of thumb among the prescribers in my program was this (benzos in general):
1. If you want to be nice and it was a minor infraction and they had been on it for many years - 6 month taper
2. If it was a serious violation/diversion/selling/serious abuse/overdose - 4 week taper or inpatient detox if needed.
That being said, clonazepam has a long half life, so it is medically relatively safe to stop cold turkey at low doses. Higher doses is a grayer area, but I still don't do it.
Do you have supervision in your program? I would definitely make use of it if you do. I also don't do contracts, but if you do that should be spelled out in the contract.
This depends a lot on their other risk factors, age, heart condition, seizure history, etc.
If somebody is supplementing prescribed benzos with lots of street benzos, then I am going to taper fast and maybe start an anti-epileptic drug instead because they're not likely to actually stop using benzos no matter what you do.
Klonipin is longer acting, which is to your benefit. I like the protocol laid out by the VA. Take your benzo... convert it to equivalent diazepam, reduce by 12.5% a week until at half the original dose (1month), hold a month, then continue dropping 12.5% a week until at zero. Adjust rate as necessary. Consider adjuncts as needed.
I've found that patients don't handle the switch to the long-acting well if coming from xanax/ativan. I just gradually lower the dose of whatever they're on. I've had better results doing it this way. Patients on xanax at least tend to be in it for the quick rush of relief that alprazolam gives more than anything else (it works as way to prevent them from every developing anything resembling a coping skill for their anxiety). Klonopin/valium doesn't give them that, so they tend to struggle.
Wasn’t this thread about a patient on klonipin?
I don't know what the VA guidelines are, but you definitely can't switch over all at once. There's no real way of determining equivalency without some trial and error (and genetic testing can aid if you're switching to a drug like Valium). The equivalency guidelines between Ativan and Valium vary by a factor of 2x (1:5 vs 1:10). Plus Valium is soporific so switching to an estimation of an equivalent dose could snowball somebody. And if someone responds more to certain metabolites more than others, it can take days for a response to Valium vs. Xanax, etc., even though Valium itself is very fast-acting. Personally, I don't respond to Valium for about several days, and I don't feel a cut for about a week. And the 1:10 ratio is too high for me personally, but it's anticipated with me being an intermediate CYP2C19 metabolizer.Just responding to a related point about the VA's guidelines. I don't think "longer-acting switches" work all that well in practice.
You could do whatever you want but the trick is convincing some non-clinical people that you made the right decision in the event that there’s a bad outcome, and I don’t think there’s much of a science on predicting what people may or may not think about that reasoning in those circumstances.If we find out someone is doing something egregious like alcohol+heroin+benzo and are on a high standing dose of benzo do we have any obligation to offer a outpatient taper? Or could you just stop prescribing and tell them they need inpatient detox and if they refuse they may die?
You could do whatever you want but the trick is convincing some non-clinical people that you made the right decision in the event that there’s a bad outcome, and I don’t think there’s much of a science on predicting what people may or may not think about that reasoning in those circumstances.
Anyway, I think the idea of giving someone a taper who’s proven to be irresponsible with the medication someone silly. Obviously it’s what I’ve done before, but if I’m taking them off for misuse, I’m presuming they’re misusing the taper, too.
I would do it more for the optics than for thinking it makes medical sense. You give the taper so you can show you were giving them a chance to do this correctly. Then, if they call you up saying that they used it all up in one week, you can refer them for inpatient detox with a clear conscience.Anyway, I think the idea of giving someone a taper who’s proven to be irresponsible with the medication someone silly. Obviously it’s what I’ve done before, but if I’m taking them off for misuse, I’m presuming they’re misusing the taper, too.
What if the patient refuses inpatient detox or it’s not available. If you educate them on risks if withdrawal and they still overuse then the onus is on them correct?I would do it more for the optics than for thinking it makes medical sense. You give the taper so you can show you were giving them a chance to do this correctly. Then, if they call you up saying that they used it all up in one week, you can refer them for inpatient detox with a clear conscience.
What if the patient refuses inpatient detox or it’s not available. If you educate them on risks if withdrawal and they still overuse then the onus is on them correct?
Anyway, I think the idea of giving someone a taper who’s proven to be irresponsible with the medication someone silly. Obviously it’s what I’ve done before, but if I’m taking them off for misuse, I’m presuming they’re misusing the taper, too.
I’d presume the most likely thing it would treat is psychiatrist anxiety. I would not anticipate them taking it.For someone misusing taper, what do you think of tegretol or another AED? Sources are conflicting if it works for preventing seizures but it seems better than enabling misuse.
For someone misusing taper, what do you think of tegretol or another AED? Sources are conflicting if it works for preventing seizures but it seems better than enabling misuse.
I had an attending suggest gabapentin 100 mg TID...
What about for benzo withdrawal. As good response as EToH withdrawal?Gabapentin has clear efficacy in managing alcohol withdrawal, but I don't puss around with gabapentin doses when managing withdrawal. Most of the studies used doses of 300 mg TID, and for someone with heavy use and/or currently active symptoms of withdrawal, I just start 600 mg TID and warn them that they will likely be sedated. For most folks that I've used this on - either due to alcohol or BZD withdrawal - it seems to work pretty well with minimal additional doses of BZDs for breakthrough.