- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,507
- Reaction score
- 337
This was posted on a different forum:
==> Maternal VS good except temp = 102.2f
....WBC 19.9, ...... In the end I didn't give her the epidural.
==> Do you agree?
My reply was:
Yes. First, do no harm.
Taking the conservative safe approach here was the best thing. A
labor epidural is not an anesthesia emergency. With all due respect to
the ladies here, women have been giving birth for thousands of years without benefit of epidural.
Had ANYTHING happened (even with the baby, not just with mom) a
really sharp plaintiff attorney would try to make a connection between your
epidural and her potential underlying septic state. The epidural was not
needed to save the pt's life, just make her more comfortable, and therefore it could be argued that it was an unncessary risk.
Do you agree?
Also see:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9818616/
==> Maternal VS good except temp = 102.2f
....WBC 19.9, ...... In the end I didn't give her the epidural.
==> Do you agree?
My reply was:
Yes. First, do no harm.
Taking the conservative safe approach here was the best thing. A
labor epidural is not an anesthesia emergency. With all due respect to
the ladies here, women have been giving birth for thousands of years without benefit of epidural.
Had ANYTHING happened (even with the baby, not just with mom) a
really sharp plaintiff attorney would try to make a connection between your
epidural and her potential underlying septic state. The epidural was not
needed to save the pt's life, just make her more comfortable, and therefore it could be argued that it was an unncessary risk.
Do you agree?
Also see:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9818616/