Last edited:
@HL8208 IMO chances at Top 20s are not great, so only apply if you're okay with donating money.
Your research will not be enough to carry you at the research powerhouses. They'd want to see pubs, big conferences, and presentations.
Not sure about the LGBT effect but as a ORM, CA, straight applicant, 72.5 LizzyM w/ average-->above average ECs can get you rejected quite easily at Top 20s.If that were the case, it would be nearly impossible for anyone to get into Top 20 aside from guys coming from Top 20 UG who did research in a very lucrative and productive lab. Besides OP has a pending publication.
I think OP's stats are a bit low for Top 20 (72.5 LizzyM). But as an LGBT applicant with good activities and significant research that he can explain, he should be good for some Top 20s, but not necessarily those of HMS/Yale type. Rather he'll be good for schools like Pitt, Duke, UCLA and Columbia.
Not sure about the LGBT effect but as a ORM, CA, straight applicant, 72.5 LizzyM w/ average-->above average ECs can get you rejected quite easily at Top 20s.
Many applicants have much higher stats+more significant research, in addition to not being ORMs. While I agree that the OP has a theoretical shot, it is very very limited. The amount of 3.8/34 Asians from CA is substantial, and the vast majority of them will not end up at T-20s.
If you're going to apply to Columbia+Duke+UCSF/UCLA/UCSD you might as well add all of the rest in. Just don't expect much.Thanks for your honest input guys!
Looks like I'll be adding the top UC's, Columbia, Pitt, and Duke. Am I out of the running for places like Cornell, Feinberg, Icahn, NYU, and UofMI? I understand it's an incredibly steep uphill battle for me, but I'm okay donating. Not sure what difference (if any) it makes, but my undergrad institution is very prestigious.
The LGBT is a significant factor, although i'm not sure whether it helps as much as being a URM (both groups seem widely underrepresented in medicine). But i agree being a CA applicant can hurt for Top 20 schools, especially those with having borderline stats.
I'm saying that while significant, productive research will obviously help for any medical school (not just for research powerhouses), not having publications or elite conference presentations isn't a drawback since it really depends on factors outside of the applicants' control.
@WedgeDawg no community involvement. Considering how recently this unfolded, I haven't had time to find anything meaningful that could fit within my schedule. It did give me fodder for my challenge/diversity statements, though. I suppose it'll probably be on the less helpful side.
@HL8208 IMO chances at Top 20s are not great, so only apply if you're okay with donating money.
Your research will not be enough to carry you at the research powerhouses. They'd want to see pubs, big conferences, and presentations.
Schools with no secondaries/minimal secondaries would be a good choice, little time investment:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/what-schools-have-no-secondary-essays.1116289/