- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,529
- Reaction score
- 349
Seems pretty nice. Can anyone think of any limitations to it, or flaws that the video doesn't elucidate??
It seems that if it were that easy to do away with the laryngoscope, it would have been done a long time ago....
>I saw it advertised in a paramedic/EMT magazine. The company said they're almost ready to sell them, but not quite yet. I was hoping someone on this forum had been involved in a clinical trial.
Indeed. Even the Fast trach lma has a manipulating handle for fine tuning the approach of the tube to the glottis. I think the standard approach for intubating with a plain LMA (the gold standard supraglottic airway) is to use the fiber optic bronchoscope. It's another addition to the airway gimmick heap of history, IMO.
I agree - and even with the handle and the bar that's supposed to lift the epiglottis the iLMA in an abnormal airway can be useless.
I guess they're aiming this more at a paramedic level where FOBs aren't available.
Also wondering what happens when someone actively vomits with the device in place as a purely supraglottic airway - looks to me like it might facilitate aspiration in that case.
Interestingly I did a quick search and can find NO literature yet on this device and nothing on the manufacturers site has any comment on success rates of intubation, risks/contraindications, or any of the practical stuf like how wide does mouth opening have to be to use the device, does it come in different sizes etc.
Oh well - time will tell!