- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
- Messages
- 283
- Reaction score
- 25
I have a question for any current or past LECOM students: how do you feel the EDUCATION is at LECOM? Specifically I am asking about LDP since that's the program I am interested in and have been accepted into, but comments on OMM/OPP and other courses that everyone takes together would also be appreciated. Did you/do you feel prepared for COMLEX exams, rotations, residency, and ultimately being a practicing physician?
I hear a lot of people having really negative impressions about the rules, administration, "help" with rotations, etc., but what I am really concerned about is the idea that there is high faculty turn-over and lectures that are not helpful. Does LDP also employ the use of case studies at all? From what I understand, most programs (other schools) with traditional lecture-based curriculum do intersperse case studies - which I think is good, but PBL just isn't my overall choice of learning method.
Thanks for any input you might have!
For first year, LDP works well; you get the benefit of dissection in anatomy, and neuroanatomy is taught well. As primadonna stated, microbiology is great. Biochemistry/genetics are good for the most part. Physiology is awful, pharmacology is taught very poorly and is disorganized. General pathology is also taught very poorly giving a bad foundation for the system-specific pathology, which is usually taught well, but since you have no foundation, it doesn't work.
Second year (systems) there is entirely too much LDP time spent with redundant lectures from clinicians or mandatory repeated physiology/pharm lectures that were already taught poorly in core. So much of your time is spent in mandatory lecture that by time it comes to study for boards, you're running out of time to put it all together. Since you're only doing one system at once, you are not really reviewing all of the material together, and they do not do a good job of integrating the multisystem effects of disease. LDP does not really employ case studies to connect what you're learning to the bigger picture.
Honestly when I was beginning school I did not think PBL suited my learning style at all, but two years later I'm regretting it. Lectures in undergrad for the most part are so much different from lectures in medical school. Most of medicine can be much more easily and clearly learned from reading a textbook and discussing it in small group sessions (a la PBL or ISP), which you really do not have time to do as an LDP student because of the insane amount of lecture hours that they force upon you. There is one pathology teacher who blocks off "lecture" time specifically for reading, which is nice, but she is the only one who does this. There are "directed study" times in the schedule, but in LDP they usually double-up and give you a (bad) lecture on it anyway, further compounding the time waste.
I can't speak for being prepared for rotations yet because I won't start until June, but a lot of your board preparation as an LDP student will be spent making up for the lack of a good basic science foundation since most of the basic science teachers are not so great.
Feel free to PM me for more info if this isn't candid enough...