- Joined
- Dec 1, 2008
- Messages
- 512
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
What do you think about them?
Think it plays a major role?
What do you think about them?
Think it plays a major role?
I agree that Jimmy Choo is ******ed but she gave you a really good advice. Why dont you study for DAT and prepare your PS than thinking about other stuff. Seriously.
[B said:Waitlisted[/B]2009;8015719]Or I can hold on to hope for this cycle still and wait until early June to prep for 2010 cycle. How about that. I still have a lot of wait lists to be pulled from. Obama says hope, I believe him.
I think people are more concerned about URM admissions than they are about legacy admissions because more people are affected by URM admissions. My friend applied last year and the school decided to accept a URM with stats way below my friend's and rejected my friend. That happens a lot.
I haven't encountered any legacy kids that were given preference simply because their family has ties with the school. None of my friends have been affected by it either. So it does't bother me as much as preference to URM's.
I think the idea behind URM admissions is a good one. The idea is that they are underrepresented and they admit them in the hopes that they might go and serve others who are in the same position that they once were. Maybe a sort of "pay it forward" if you will.
Brown's official legacy policy states that all other things being equal, children of alumni might be given a slight advantage in the application process.
For the class of 2008, 41 percent of legacy applicants were accepted, as opposed to the 16 percent accepted from the entire applicant group, said Director of Admission Michael Goldberger.
According to a Jan. 2004 article in The Economist, Brown's legacy statistics are fairly typical among the nation's top schools. The magazine found that legacy students account for 10 to 15 percent of every freshman class at most Ivy League universities.
The Economist also reported that, on average, legacy applicants are two to four times more likely to be accepted to the best universities than non-legacy applicants.
And if you're really outraged you can contact Sen. Kennedy's office or your own senator's office and ask them to support his bill.According to a newly published research paper by Thomas Loverro, Class of 2003, legacies are admitted to college at higher rates than other students — even if they are somewhat less qualified.
In the paper, which was published in the Stanford Undergraduate Research Journal, Loverro cited a Department of Education report that found that legacy students at Harvard averaged 35 points less on the SAT than non-legacies. According to Loverro, Harvard's admit rate for legacies is 40 percent versus 11 percent for general applicants.
To resolve perceived problems with legacy admissions, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), who was himself a legacy admission to Harvard, has recently proposed legislation that will force colleges to report on the race and economic status of first-year students who are relatives of alumni or who were admitted early decision.
3 generation family history of NYU dental graduates + reasonably competitive application = didn't even bother sending me a rejection letter
It is a good theory, but the funny thing is, that idea of paying it forward is not isolated to race-on-race action. I actually DO want to work with poor people and I stressed this at my interview. But I am a 30-year-old white female, who is not financially privileged (30+ is a group that is under-represented in dental school, too). If I were black or hispanic and had a baby or some other "legitimate" hardship, I would have been accepted this year with the same or lower stats. I can think of people at my school who have taken classes with me and not done as well, who were probably accepted this year, simply because they are an Under-Represented Minority. I guess it is what it is, but "fair," it is not.
3 generation family history of NYU dental graduates + reasonably competitive application = didn't even bother sending me a rejection letter
They are slacking and it paid off.
Hey, it worked for me 👍
Not the legacy part, the slacking part I mean.
On this point wouldnt they have been pushed to succeed in undergraduate? Yet they have failed and are being admitted due to legacy status. They are slacking and it paid off.
I agree that Jimmy Choo is ******ed but she gave you a really good advice. Why dont you study for DAT and prepare your PS than thinking about other stuff. Seriously.