Letter to the Editor

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Noyac

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
8,022
Reaction score
2,816
Here is a recent letter to the editor of my local paper. Any thoughts?

Back to basic birthing

Dear Editors,

April is Cesarian section awareness month.

The U.S. c-section rate is 30 percent. That means one in four pregnant women giving birth will receive a c-section. According to the World Health Organization, the c-section rate should be no higher than 5-10 percent. If it’s higher than that, c-sections unnecessarily harm both the mother and baby. Most c-sections are done because of failure to progress, or the mothers inability to push the baby out, which can be caused by drugs such as epidurals and the supine position. Women were designed to birth in a squatting position.

Women require the same need for privacy that all mammals do. When a women enters an unfamiliar environment like a hospital with many people around, her labor slows down because her primitive brain is saying this is not a good place to give birth. She needs to get back to her cave to birth in her own territory and in privacy. Birth is a sexual event, and just like sex, birth requires the need for privacy.

Pitocin and other drugs are often used to speed up labor, but these drugs can cause contractions to become more painful, the cause baby’s blood pressure to drop, and uterine rupture. Lying down in a hospital bed can cause this, too. This creates the need for many other interventions. Epidurals increase the chances of vacuum, forceps and c-section delivery. Interventions are like falling dominos – once one falls, the rest will follow, and it begins the minute the woman leaves her home. Complications are caused by interventions. Most homebirths are safe for the majority of women.

The U.S. has the second-worst maternal and infant mortality rates, and only 1 percent of women give birth at home. The countries with the lowest mortality rates have midwives and the majority of births are done at home. C-sections are major surgeries that carry many more risks than a vaginal delivery. It has more risks for mothers and babies, mothers have a harder time bonding with their babies, and a harder time nursing their children, and have a higher risk of postpartum depression. This is also true if the baby is separated from her mother immediately following vaginal delivery, and if the mother has had drugs given to her. The absence of this bonding time between mother and baby has traumatic results mentally and physically, which can result in depression, anxiety, violent behavior and drug abuse later in life for the child.

Babies need the stimulation of uncut vaginal walls to stimulate their breathing, their nervous system, and their digestive system. Without that, many diseases and poor

health often are the results. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. With drugs and interference both physically and mentally, the whole natural process of labor and birth is stopped. This stops the hormones that began the bonding process, and everything else that Mother Nature intended to happen for the survival and health of the species. Violent birth leads to violent lifestyles, so peace on earth begins with birth. C-sections should only be done for births with placenta previa, which is very rare.

Homebirths are safe, perhaps safer than hospital births, so please, women, educate yourselves and choose to have a homebirth either unassisted or assisted with a midwife that will respect your privacy. If the midwife gives you the feelings of being watched, then the midwife is no benefit. Wouldn’t it be more joyful for couples to catch their own children, and birth their children the way there where created? Like Michael Odent said, “the best place to give birth is the best place to make love.” The only way to avoid an unnecessary c-section is to stay out of the hospital. Poverty, intervention and fear are the major killers in childbirth. It was never doctors and hospitals that made birth safe – only more dangerous. But before I go, let me leave you with these two quotes: “There is something wrong with a society that insists on making a complicated, expensive, medical emergency out of a normal physiological function primitive women have been doing by themselves for centuries.” – Cathi Cogle; “If we hope to create a non-violent world where respect and kindness replace fear and hatred, we must begin with how we treat each other at the beginning of life. For that is where our deepest patterns are set. From those roots grow fear and alienation, or love and trust.”

-Suzanne Arms, author of Immaculate Deception II,
 
Here is a recent letter to the editor of my local paper. Any thoughts?

Back to basic birthing

Dear Editors,

April is Cesarian section awareness month.

The U.S. c-section rate is 30 percent. That means one in four pregnant women giving birth will receive a c-section. According to the World Health Organization, the c-section rate should be no higher than 5-10 percent. If it’s higher than that, c-sections unnecessarily harm both the mother and baby. Most c-sections are done because of failure to progress, or the mothers inability to push the baby out, which can be caused by drugs such as epidurals and the supine position. Women were designed to birth in a squatting position.

Women require the same need for privacy that all mammals do. When a women enters an unfamiliar environment like a hospital with many people around, her labor slows down because her primitive brain is saying this is not a good place to give birth. She needs to get back to her cave to birth in her own territory and in privacy. Birth is a sexual event, and just like sex, birth requires the need for privacy.

Pitocin and other drugs are often used to speed up labor, but these drugs can cause contractions to become more painful, the cause baby’s blood pressure to drop, and uterine rupture. Lying down in a hospital bed can cause this, too. This creates the need for many other interventions. Epidurals increase the chances of vacuum, forceps and c-section delivery. Interventions are like falling dominos – once one falls, the rest will follow, and it begins the minute the woman leaves her home. Complications are caused by interventions. Most homebirths are safe for the majority of women.

The U.S. has the second-worst maternal and infant mortality rates, and only 1 percent of women give birth at home. The countries with the lowest mortality rates have midwives and the majority of births are done at home. C-sections are major surgeries that carry many more risks than a vaginal delivery. It has more risks for mothers and babies, mothers have a harder time bonding with their babies, and a harder time nursing their children, and have a higher risk of postpartum depression. This is also true if the baby is separated from her mother immediately following vaginal delivery, and if the mother has had drugs given to her. The absence of this bonding time between mother and baby has traumatic results mentally and physically, which can result in depression, anxiety, violent behavior and drug abuse later in life for the child.

Babies need the stimulation of uncut vaginal walls to stimulate their breathing, their nervous system, and their digestive system. Without that, many diseases and poor

health often are the results. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. With drugs and interference both physically and mentally, the whole natural process of labor and birth is stopped. This stops the hormones that began the bonding process, and everything else that Mother Nature intended to happen for the survival and health of the species. Violent birth leads to violent lifestyles, so peace on earth begins with birth. C-sections should only be done for births with placenta previa, which is very rare.

Homebirths are safe, perhaps safer than hospital births, so please, women, educate yourselves and choose to have a homebirth either unassisted or assisted with a midwife that will respect your privacy. If the midwife gives you the feelings of being watched, then the midwife is no benefit. Wouldn’t it be more joyful for couples to catch their own children, and birth their children the way there where created? Like Michael Odent said, “the best place to give birth is the best place to make love.” The only way to avoid an unnecessary c-section is to stay out of the hospital. Poverty, intervention and fear are the major killers in childbirth. It was never doctors and hospitals that made birth safe – only more dangerous. But before I go, let me leave you with these two quotes: “There is something wrong with a society that insists on making a complicated, expensive, medical emergency out of a normal physiological function primitive women have been doing by themselves for centuries.” – Cathi Cogle; “If we hope to create a non-violent world where respect and kindness replace fear and hatred, we must begin with how we treat each other at the beginning of life. For that is where our deepest patterns are set. From those roots grow fear and alienation, or love and trust.”

-Suzanne Arms, author of Immaculate Deception II,

Is Suzanne in the 5th grade? This sounds like it was written by a 12 year old. How does she have the balls to make so many unfounded statements?
 
What ya expect Noyac, you live in a high "squirrel" density area--they migrated over from Cali. Write back to the paper and tell them ya want a "squirrel" awareness day complete with parade on main street. This is their day where they can be "squirrel" for a day without any repercussions and flaunt their uniqueness. I want the people in strange cults, clowns that were abducted by space aliens, sexual deviants, hypnotists and that one dude that every city has ,usually with a megaphone, preaching on a street corner with bible in hand and no audience. It's all good, let's have a party!:hardy: -----Regards, ---Zippy
 
Wow. She is making some pretty sweeping generalizations there without any evidence to back them up. Unfortunately the general public reading that letter won't be wondering where the evidence is. By the by, is there any evidence that epidurals have adverse effects on the progression of labor? If there were, I would think that you would have more OBs trying to urge their patients to go natural.

Birth is a sexual event, and just like sex, birth requires the need for privacy.

Uhhh, from my vantage point on my OB/Gyn rotation, there wasn't much "sexual" about the birthing process, except that it's the end result of sex.

The only way to avoid an unnecessary c-section is to stay out of the hospital.

Unfortunately, it's also a good way to avoid a necessary C-section.
 
Her squirrel titre is 5X10 to the 50th (the definition of an absurd number).
She doesn't like the CS rate? She can thank John Edwards and his ilk, who she would probably love to see in the whitehouse.
 
hmmm

If it weren't for litigation our c-section rate would be a lot lower..

Our infant mortality rate is higher than the rest of the world, because we are the only country crazy enough to try to keep 23 and 24 weekers alive (for a few days).

I knew a midwive who gave birth at home - her husband was a pediatric endocrinologist... well the baby got stuck, and the delivering midwife couldn't get the baby out... by the time they came into the ER the baby was dead with tight nuchal cord... and had to be delivered via c-section anyway... talk about people who should have known better...
 
and that one dude that every city has ,usually with a megaphone, preaching on a street corner with bible in hand and no audience. It's all good, let's have a party!:hardy: -----Regards, ---Zippy


:laugh::laugh:

YOU'VE BEEN HERE ZIPSTERS!!! CANAL AND CHARTERS!!!

Dudes out there every day, sportin' his umbrella hat. Megaphone. Preachin' the word to no one.

Been at that corner for at least 12 years, probably more.

Was back after hurricane Katrina before most people.

YOU DA MAN ZIPPY!
 
C-sections should only be done for births with placenta previa, which is very rare.

This says it all. She is willing to offer bogus medical pronouncements as fact. Unfortunately, she will not face the legal consequences (not to mention medical and ethical as well) of a poor outcome based on her advice. Yes, most of the time things go fine. And yes, those tracings can be way overcalled. But sometimes they don't, and that's when you need trained care.

I certainly sympathize with some of the sentiments like going into a strange hospital with a continuous train of strangers interrupting while spread out in the lithotomy position. But please, a backup plan of "911" is pushing it.

Oh yeah, while I'm sure plenty of people have looked at it more closely, the last time I looked at the literature, Epidural anesthesia at contemporary dosing may make the average labor 2 hrs longer. That's it. No difference in C/S rate. And how many patients do you see that you pop in an epidural, and that gives enough relief that they relax and the baby pops out?
 
. By the by, is there any evidence that epidurals have adverse effects on the progression of labor? .


Yes. Epidurals can prolong 1rst stage of labor. It has no effect on 2nd stage, and no effect on c/s rate.

By the way, not all of what this yahoo is saying is crazy by the way. I do agree with her that as doctors, we tend to treat pregnancy as a disease state rather than a natural physiologic process. I also agree that a lot of what we do to pregnant women while in the hospital is for doctors convenience. For example, when my wife was in labor, we had a terrible time trying to convince the staff that we wanted the IV heplock'd so we could walk around. We also wanted the ability to birth in what ever position was most comfortable. It is very true that birthing on the back closes the pelvic outlet by at least 20% as opposed to squatting.

Finally, do you think that if someone pregnant eats while birthing that this will put her more at risk for aspiration if she has to undergo a general? Is their a tier system for full stomach? "Doc, this patient is ultra-full stomach, and our next section is only maximum full stomach, and our last patient of the day will just be a regular full stomach?" I've never heard of that, but I may be mistaken.
 
Finally, do you think that if someone pregnant eats while birthing that this will put her more at risk for aspiration if she has to undergo a general? Is their a tier system for full stomach? "Doc, this patient is ultra-full stomach, and our next section is only maximum full stomach, and our last patient of the day will just be a regular full stomach?" I've never heard of that, but I may be mistaken.

I'd rather be the full stomach without the double whopper since as we know from Mendelson it's the big chunks that'll kill ya.

Other than that the lady is the kind to show up with her kids suffering from rubella since she gave them homeopathic vaccines and not that awful chemical stuff
 
I do agree with her that as doctors, we tend to treat pregnancy as a disease state rather than a natural physiologic process.

Well, when a not uncommon outcome of that "natural physiologic process" is significant morbidity and mortality for mom and baby alike, I'm quite comfortable treating the whole shebang as a disease process. 🙂

Our c-section rate may be a concerning 30%, but this fool thinks that maternal mortality as high as 1-2% per child delivered naturally is preferable.

What's more, the average tie-dye granola munchin' crazy who'd go for home delivery 'cause it's natural are likely to be the sort who think that prenatal care and vaccinations are also unnecessary.

It takes a special kind of willful ignorance to argue that home births are safer than hospital births.
 
I'd rather be the full stomach without the double whopper since as we know from Mendelson it's the big chunks that'll kill ya.

So this is exactly what I was asking.... is a pregnant lady with a known whopper two hours ago MORE of a full stomach than the NPO pregant lady? I'm just saying, I never have heard or read about these different grades of full stomachness you speak of. I may have read the wrong text books however.
 
Yeah Jetman, that be the dude with the megaphone on Canal Street. Regards, ---Zip
 
Top