Hi -
For those of you applying in 2015-6, I thought I would just share some information. I am a faculty member for a PT Program. I have read a lot of comments on here, and almost all state something like, 'I have excellent LORs.' It is quite possibly true. However, I think some applicants may just not know.
We do interview, and we score interviews with a large percent for ultimate acceptance. The interviewer evaluates the interview and letters of recommendation at our institution to make a recommendation for acceptances.
When asking people to write letters, please make sure each person can address all of your strengths and write a letter that shows they know you.
A couple of examples from this cycle:
1. I interviewed someone with high stats...like overall 3.9 and 155-160 GREs. The interview was average...nothing good, nothing bad. 2 of the 3 LORs stated the references recommend, but with reservations; both of these people stated they knew the applicant 'well' for at least a year. The other letter was highly recommend, but know the applicant 'moderately' for 2 months. All letters (the additional part from the check boxes) were all less than 5 sentences. I am guessing this applicant, if asked, would state, 'I have good LORs.' I could not recommend this person highly for acceptance based on my interview (average), and well below LORs.
2. I interviewed someone with above average generally, but average stats for a PT applicant (3.4 GPA and low 150's GRE). This person was probably fairly low on the list before interviews as below our average accepts. The interview was very good, and I was between 2 scores (highest and 2nd highest). The LORs were quite frankly the best I have ever read. Each of the 3 (PT, professor, and boss) knew this person well and really spoke about the person's potential for PT and how they will help move the profession forward (the PT wrote that). That pushed me to score them in the highest category since these people truly evaluated more than I could in a short interview. This person will be joining us in the Class of 2018.
I know you all do not read your LORs, but it is worth it to have an honest conversation with potential writers. Come up with a list of more than 3 people (and pay attention to required letters for each school you apply to), and then meet with them. Tell them what you need, and ask them to frankly tell you if they can evaluate you favorably for all of your strengths. It may require you to swallow some humble pie if the potential reviewer says no, but rather they say no then write a letter that will not help you (and may hurt you).
Ask the schools you are applying to how much these are weighted. We will tell any applicant who asks exactly how we weight interviews/LOR, GPA, and GRE. Prepare for applying to avoid surprises as you move through the process. Schools are getting so many applicants now that you all become a number after a while as applicants are reviewed and processed. Do something to make yourself stand out!
For those of you applying in 2015-6, I thought I would just share some information. I am a faculty member for a PT Program. I have read a lot of comments on here, and almost all state something like, 'I have excellent LORs.' It is quite possibly true. However, I think some applicants may just not know.
We do interview, and we score interviews with a large percent for ultimate acceptance. The interviewer evaluates the interview and letters of recommendation at our institution to make a recommendation for acceptances.
When asking people to write letters, please make sure each person can address all of your strengths and write a letter that shows they know you.
A couple of examples from this cycle:
1. I interviewed someone with high stats...like overall 3.9 and 155-160 GREs. The interview was average...nothing good, nothing bad. 2 of the 3 LORs stated the references recommend, but with reservations; both of these people stated they knew the applicant 'well' for at least a year. The other letter was highly recommend, but know the applicant 'moderately' for 2 months. All letters (the additional part from the check boxes) were all less than 5 sentences. I am guessing this applicant, if asked, would state, 'I have good LORs.' I could not recommend this person highly for acceptance based on my interview (average), and well below LORs.
2. I interviewed someone with above average generally, but average stats for a PT applicant (3.4 GPA and low 150's GRE). This person was probably fairly low on the list before interviews as below our average accepts. The interview was very good, and I was between 2 scores (highest and 2nd highest). The LORs were quite frankly the best I have ever read. Each of the 3 (PT, professor, and boss) knew this person well and really spoke about the person's potential for PT and how they will help move the profession forward (the PT wrote that). That pushed me to score them in the highest category since these people truly evaluated more than I could in a short interview. This person will be joining us in the Class of 2018.
I know you all do not read your LORs, but it is worth it to have an honest conversation with potential writers. Come up with a list of more than 3 people (and pay attention to required letters for each school you apply to), and then meet with them. Tell them what you need, and ask them to frankly tell you if they can evaluate you favorably for all of your strengths. It may require you to swallow some humble pie if the potential reviewer says no, but rather they say no then write a letter that will not help you (and may hurt you).
Ask the schools you are applying to how much these are weighted. We will tell any applicant who asks exactly how we weight interviews/LOR, GPA, and GRE. Prepare for applying to avoid surprises as you move through the process. Schools are getting so many applicants now that you all become a number after a while as applicants are reviewed and processed. Do something to make yourself stand out!