- Joined
- Dec 18, 2004
- Messages
- 1,495
- Reaction score
- 3
Its obviously not news, but I have noted in osteopathic schools a very strongly directed intent towards the goal of producing primary care physicians, including PC mentors, with (apparently) no option of specialty mentors, and a high level of PC clinical requirements.
I do realize that one may "buck the trend" and specialize in whatever one wishes; but by how much does this PC oriented system increase the already uphill battle to specialize, as I am guessing it must to some degree? Are there any deficits in osteopathic UG medical training that may be inherent when following this focused approach, leading perhaps to less success at procurring the board scores necessary to obtain a specialty residency?
And as a general aside: Why does osteopathic medicine have such a "hell bent on primary care" thing anyway? Is it being used mainly as a way to distinguish the profession's identity? Like a "That's what we D.O.!" sort of thing? It seems to me that the AOA would almost prefer to produce only PC doc's.
Was this the original intention behind osteopathic medicine's formation?
Maybe I am concerned for nothing, but I do not want to have my options limited by an education guided by a strangely self-imposed philosophy, whatever the direction in medicine I choose to pursue. I don't see why it is necessary that there should be this PC umbrella over osteopathy, as it is a strong approach to medicine in general.
Also, I do not regard PC as any less deserving than any other field.
(Disclaimer: I readily admit that I am a premed who knows nothing about which I am speaking)
I do realize that one may "buck the trend" and specialize in whatever one wishes; but by how much does this PC oriented system increase the already uphill battle to specialize, as I am guessing it must to some degree? Are there any deficits in osteopathic UG medical training that may be inherent when following this focused approach, leading perhaps to less success at procurring the board scores necessary to obtain a specialty residency?
And as a general aside: Why does osteopathic medicine have such a "hell bent on primary care" thing anyway? Is it being used mainly as a way to distinguish the profession's identity? Like a "That's what we D.O.!" sort of thing? It seems to me that the AOA would almost prefer to produce only PC doc's.
Was this the original intention behind osteopathic medicine's formation?
Maybe I am concerned for nothing, but I do not want to have my options limited by an education guided by a strangely self-imposed philosophy, whatever the direction in medicine I choose to pursue. I don't see why it is necessary that there should be this PC umbrella over osteopathy, as it is a strong approach to medicine in general.
Also, I do not regard PC as any less deserving than any other field.
(Disclaimer: I readily admit that I am a premed who knows nothing about which I am speaking)