representwitpixels
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 21
I'm writing personal statements and recognize varying degrees of differences between POI's research lines - especially (maybe this is ubiquitous) within the subset that I am interested in. For example's sake, let's take treatment of borderline as an interest area - within this area there are numerous lines of research. If I'm applying to 12-20 programs with POI's doing BPD research (too much narrowing of interest yields too few faculty/programs), what level of depth and specificity should a personal statement contain? As I'm starting to write statements, it seems like I will need to write 12-20 largely unique statements in order to privilege certain questions and insights I've raised from past experiences to achieve fit with the recent/current papers that POI's are focused on. I sort of enjoy the writing (though the part of writing about myself is a drag) but do wonder, is my focus too specific? If I was a faculty member reviewing applicant's statement's I'd probably prefer those that are thoroughly informed about my present work, on one hand. On the other hand, I'd appreciate an applicant's general interests and openness to my broader sector of research.
Tangentially, as a non-traditional applicant with about 12 years of diverse yet relevant research and clinical experiences, I'm struggling with how to include what I think are most of the salient experiences while still maintaining some granularity of description and relationship to my present research interests (interests change and develop over the years of course). Would you suggest going into less detail and being more complete in presenting myself or a bit more judicious narration privileging my interests as they are now?
Tangentially, as a non-traditional applicant with about 12 years of diverse yet relevant research and clinical experiences, I'm struggling with how to include what I think are most of the salient experiences while still maintaining some granularity of description and relationship to my present research interests (interests change and develop over the years of course). Would you suggest going into less detail and being more complete in presenting myself or a bit more judicious narration privileging my interests as they are now?