- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 291
- Reaction score
- 356
An individual was declared not guilty by reason of insanity for felony theft of an art piece due to having too much Adderall prescribed to him. Both the defense and prosecution agreed on the ruling, and that his insanity was purely drug induced. All parties also agreed the NP who gave the prescription perpetuated the chain of events. This all being said, who would bear the brunt of any legal rammifications if there were any? Do they fall on the NP or the physician they practice under? Please keep it civil, I know there are strong feelings on NP autonomy.
Article:
http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orle...a248-4baf5aa89ed7.html?sr_source=lift_amplify
It states he was given 60g Adderall daily, but hopefully that was a misprint of 60mg.
Article:
http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orle...a248-4baf5aa89ed7.html?sr_source=lift_amplify
It states he was given 60g Adderall daily, but hopefully that was a misprint of 60mg.