Lumbar Plexus Blocks

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drccw

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
333
Reaction score
32
Anyone doing them? Thought about it for our anterior hips.. Currently Sci/Fem blocks and throwing in the Lat Fem Cutaneous.... I find LFC to be an inconsistent block (in my hands) and the infamous 3 in 1 block.. well....

what are y'all doing for your ant hips?

drccw
 
LPB + catheter and single shot sciatic = the bomb

how long do your ant hips take?

are you doing these with ultrasound or just surface landmarks?

I've only done 2 of these LP blocks. One of them totally didnt work despite getting the appropriate twitches...
 
Do you have any trouble with a LP turning into a total epidural books say it happen often.
 
Anyone doing them? Thought about it for our anterior hips.. Currently Sci/Fem blocks and throwing in the Lat Fem Cutaneous.... I find LFC to be an inconsistent block (in my hands) and the infamous 3 in 1 block.. well....

what are y'all doing for your ant hips?

drccw

I just do a spinal with Duramorph added. Works pretty well. NO other blocks for hips.

Haven't done a LPB.
 
Do you have any trouble with a LP turning into a total epidural books say it happen often.

No. Again, it takes practice and skill but after doing these blocks for a few years now I have ZERO Spinal blocks and only one Epidural spread.

After talking with the experts in this block at DA U they agree with my statistics. The key is to remember this is not a paramedian block. A spinal block should be RARE in experienced hands but contralateral spread due to presumed "Epidural" is around 10%. Again, once you get good the percentage should be less than 5. You can not guarantee ZERO even if you are the Zohan of blocks.

Now, study the complications before trying this at home:

1. Damage to Ureter
2. Biopsy the Aorta
3. Biopsy the Kidney
4. High Spinal (25-30 ml's of volume used)
5. Epidural Spread (manageable complication)
6. Retroperitoneal Hematoma (now this is bad)

I love this block but you must decide if it is worth the risk. I avoid catheters due to the possible risk of retroperitoneal hematoma. A Femoral catheter is safer (based on current published literature as of this date).
 
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Oct;93(4):589-91. Epub 2004 Aug 20. Links

Comment in: Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):395; author reply 395-6. Delayed retroperitoneal haematoma after failed lumbar plexus block.

Aveline C, Bonnet F.
Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Polyclinique Sévigné, 3 rue du Chéne Germain, F-35510 Cesson-Sevigne, France. [email protected]
A 72-yr-old patient was to undergo a left lumbar plexus block by the posterior approach to achieve postoperative analgesia after hip replacement. The block failed after three unsuccessful attempts to identify nerve structures and a fascia iliaca compartment block was performed. Postoperatively the patient received enoxaparin and then phenylindanedione for thromboprophylaxis. She was re-admitted 2 weeks after surgery because of a lower limb motor deficit and a left retroperitoneal haematoma requiring blood transfusion. Clinicians need to be aware of this potential complication of lumbar plexus block in patients receiving thrombphylaxis.
 
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Blocks Are Safe for Total Hip ReplacementJacques E. Chelly, M.D., Ph.D., Rama Joshi, M.D., Arie Kandel, M.D., Rita Merman, M.D., Bruce Ben-David, M.D.
Anesthesiology, UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Posner Pain Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United StatesIntroduction:

Although, the use of lumbar plexus blocks has been shown to be effective for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement, some authors1 have advocated avoiding this technique in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis. In one series of 394 lumbar plexus blocks one cardiac arrest, and one death were observed.2 This study was designed to assess the safety associated with the use of lumbar plexus blocks.

Methods:

From 12/1/2002 to 3/18/2005, single and continuous lumbar plexus blocks were performed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement and unilateral orthopedic oncology pelvic surgery. After appropriate informed consent, the patients were placed in the lateral position with the surgical limb up. The tip of the iliac crest (TIC) and the mid-line at the spinous processes of L4 and L5 were identified and marked. A vertical line was drawn from the TIC. The site of introduction of the needle was 5 cm lateral to the middle of the spinous processes on the vertical line.3 The lumbar plexus was approached using either an electrostimulation or loss of resistance technique. In the case of a continuous nerve block technique, the catheter was introduced 4-5 cm beyond the tip of the introducer needle. After appropriate identification of either the femoral nerve or the psoas compartment, 27 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was slowly injected. Following surgery, the lumbar catheter was infused with 0.2% ropivacaine. Anticoagulation therapy (aspirin, coumadin, LMWH, fondapiranux, or unfractionated heparin) was initiated either the evening following surgery or the next day for either thromboprophylaxis (postoperative prevention of deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary emboli) or for a therapeutic indication (cardiac valves, arrhythmia, treatment of deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary emboli). In all patients the lumbar plexus catheter was removed without any consideration for the timing of the thromboprophylaxis administration. Patients were followed postoperatively until they were discharged from the hospital.

Results:

During this period, 1,737 continuous lumbar plexus blocks were performed. Complications associated with the performance of this block included 4 cases of epidural spread leading to a bilateral sensory/motor block. In one patient we recorded a brief seizure episode. In one case, the catheter was placed intrathecally. None of these complications led to permanent injury. Finally, the removal of the lumbar plexus catheter in one patient infused with heparin (PTT 46s) led to the development of a retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfer of the patient to an ICU bed. The patient recovered without sequella.

Discussion:

This is to our knowledge the largest reported series of lumbar plexus blocks. Our data demonstrates that the use of a lumbar plexus block is safe including in patients receiving postoperative thromboprophylaxis.3 However, careful consideration should be given to the performance of a lumbar plexus and the removal of a lumbar catheter in patients receiving therapeutric doses of anticoagulants. 1,3,4

References

1.Weller et al. Anesthesiology 2003, 98:581

2.Auroy et al. 2002, 97:1274

3.Hantler et al. Arthrosplathy, 2004; 191004

4.Klein et al. Anesthesiology 1997, 87:1576

Anesthesiology 2005; 103: A915Copyright © 2008, American Society of Anesthesiologists.
All rights reserved.
 
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Dec;21(8):1209-14. Links

Massive retroperitoneal hematoma during enoxaparin treatment of pulmonary embolism after primary total hip arthroplasty: case reports and review of the literature.

Lee MC, Nickisch F, Limbird RS.
Brown University Department of Orthopaedics, Cooperative Care Building, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, USA.
In light of the increasing use of enoxaparin for both prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease, the number of potential complications from this anticoagulant will also continue to increase. This article presents the first case of massive retroperitoneal hematoma during enoxaparin treatment of pulmonary embolism after a primary total hip arthroplasty and discusses several unique sequelae of the retroperitoneal hematoma. Retroperitoneal hematomas are often fatal, and treatment involves aggressive fluid resuscitation with possible surgical decompression.
 
ANALGESIA

The Effect of Analgesic Technique on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Including Analgesia: A Systematic Review

Spencer S. Liu, MD*, and Christopher L. Wu, MD
dagger.gif


[SIZE=-1]From the *Department of Anesthesiology, The Hospital of Special Surgery, and the Cornell Weill Medical Center, New York, New York; and
dagger.gif
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Address correspondence to Christopher Wu, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Carnegie 280, 600 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287. Address e-mail to [email protected] .[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Abstract[/SIZE]
BACKGROUND: The effect of postoperative analgesia on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life, quality of recovery, and patient satisfaction, has not been systematically examined. These outcomes are assessed from the patient's perspective and are recognized as valid and important end-points in clinical medicine and research. We performed a systematic review to examine the effect of postoperative analgesia on patient-reported outcomes.
METHODS: The National Library of Medicine's Medline and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for the past decade (Jan, 1996 to Jun 1, 2006). Additional Medline searches for specific outcomes (i.e., satisfaction, quality of life, and quality of recovery) were also conducted.
RESULTS: Regional analgesic techniques provide statistically superior analgesia compared with systemic opioids. There are insufficient data to determine if the type of analgesic technique, degree of analgesia, and presence of side effects may influence quality of life, quality of recovery, satisfaction, and length of stay, due in part to some significant methodologic issues.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there are data suggesting that improved postoperative analgesia leads to better patient outcomes, there is insufficient evidence to support subsequent improvements inpatient-centered outcomes such as quality of life and quality of recovery. Modest reductions in pain scores do not necessarily equate to clinically meaningful improved pain relief for the patient. Further studies are needed to develop validated patient-reported instruments and to assess the effect of analgesic techniques on patient-reported outcomes in the perioperative period.
 
A continuous fascia iliaca block (if you know how to do it) will give you the same pain relief minus the excitement and the complications.
It is the easiest block to perform, it is fool proof and it works.
If you feel that you need to do a LPB maybe you should just do an epidural and get it over with or just put morphine in the spinal like Noyac said.
A LPB is a great block that is still looking for an indication.
 
A continuous fascia iliaca block (if you know how to do it) will give you the same pain relief minus the excitement and the complications.
It is the easiest block to perform, it is fool proof and it works.
If you feel that you need to do a LPB maybe you should just do an epidural and get it over with or just put morphine in the spinal like Noyac said.
A LPB is a great block that is still looking for an indication.

I've never even seen a LPB, let alone done one.😱
 
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Ultrasound Imaging Accurately Identifies the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve

Irene Ng, MBBS, FANZCA*, Himat Vaghadia, MBBS, FRCPC, FFARCS*, Peter T. Choi, MD, MSc (Epid), FRCPC
dagger.gif
, and Naeder Helmy, MD
Dagger.gif


[SIZE=-1]From the *Department of Anesthesia, the Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and
dagger.gif
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics and the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and
Dagger.gif
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Vancouver Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [/SIZE]
BACKGROUND: Anesthesia of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) is useful in surgery involving the anterolateral thigh. We investigated the accuracy of ultrasound compared with anatomical landmarks in identifying the LFCN in human cadavers and volunteers.
METHODS: Twenty cadavers were examined. A needle was inserted targeting the LFCN with ultrasound guidance and green dye was injected. A second needle was inserted using anatomical landmarks. The LFCN was identified by dissection, and coloring of the LFCN and needle positions were evaluated. A volunteer study with 10 individuals was performed. Transdermal nerve stimulation was used to identify the LFCN bilaterally. Its position was compared with marked positions identified in advance using ultrasound and anatomical landmarks.
RESULTS: Sixteen of 19 needles inserted under ultrasound guidance in the cadavers were in contact with the LFCN. The median horizontal distance from the needle tip to the nerve was 0.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-0.0 mm). Only 1 of 19 needles inserted using anatomical landmarks was in contact with the LFCN. The median horizontal distance from the needle tip to the nerve was 18.0 mm (IQR, 11.0–23.0 mm). Sixteen of 20 marked positions made using ultrasound guidance corresponded to the identified LFCN in volunteers. The median horizontal distance from the pen-mark to the LFCN was 0.0 mm (IQR, 0.0-0.0 mm). None of the 20 marked positions made with anatomical landmarks corresponded to the LFCN. The median horizontal distance from the pen-mark to the LFCN was 15.0 mm (IQR, 10.8–20.0 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Identification of the LFCN by ultrasound is technically feasible and more accurate than anatomical landmarks.
 
The literature quotes the following for successful fascia iliaca block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve:

1. Blind/Pop technique- 40%
2. Nerve Stimulator- up to 85% with patient cooperation
3. U/S- 90-100%

The Lumbar plexus (Psoas) gets all 3 nerves 100% of the time if the block works. The success rate of the block is 99% even on 350 plus pounders.

Which technique do you prefer for the LFCN block?
 
Last edited:
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Joseph Marino, MD1, Joseph Russo, MD1, Maureen Kenny, RN1, Robert Herenstein, MD1, Elayne Livote, MPH, MS2 and Jacques E. Chelly, MD, PhD, MBA3

[SIZE=-1]1 Departments of Anesthesiology (J.M., J.R., and R.H.) and Orthopedics (M.K.), Huntington Hospital, 270 Park Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743. E-mail address for J. Marino: [email protected] . E-mail address for J. Russo: [email protected]
2 The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-LIJ Health System, 1129 Northern Boulevard, Suite 302, Manhasset, NY 11030. E-mail address: [email protected]
3 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Presbyterian-Shadyside Hospitals, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232. E-mail address: [email protected]
Investigation performed at Huntington Hospital, Huntington, New York [/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM/DVD (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM or DVD).
[/SIZE]Background: Continuous femoral or lumbar plexus blocks have been demonstrated to provide effective postoperative analgesia of the lower extremity following total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare these two techniques when used with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and the use of patient-controlled analgesia alone for postoperative pain management following unilateral primary hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Two hundred and twenty-five patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis were randomly allocated into one of three postoperative treatment groups: continuous lumbar plexus block with patient-controlled analgesia, continuous femoral block with patient-controlled analgesia, and patient-controlled analgesia alone. Scores on a visual analog pain scale administered during physiotherapy twenty-four hours postoperatively were used as the primary outcome measured. Secondary outcomes included scores on a visual analog pain scale at rest, hydromorphone consumption, opioid-related side effects, complications, sensory and motor blockade, and patient satisfaction.
Results: Continuous lumbar plexus block significantly reduced pain scores during physiotherapy on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.0001) and day 2 (p < 0.0001) compared with either continuous femoral block or patient-controlled analgesia alone. There were no significant differences for pain at rest between the two regional analgesic techniques. Both regional anesthesia techniques significantly reduced total hydromorphone consumption (p < 0.05) and delirium (disorientation to time and/or place) compared with patient-controlled analgesia alone (p < 0.023). In addition, the use of continuous lumbar plexus block was associated with fewer patients with opioid-related side effects (p < 0.05), greater distances walked (p < 0.05), and enhanced patient satisfaction (p < 0.05) compared with the use of a continuous femoral nerve block with patient-controlled analgesia or with patient-controlled analgesia alone.
Conclusions: Continuous lumbar plexus and femoral blocks significantly reduce the need for opioids and decrease related side effects. Continuous lumbar plexus block is a more effective analgesic modality than is a continuous femoral block or patient-controlled intravenous administration of hydromorphone alone during physical therapy following primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
 
The literature quotes the following for successful fascia iliaca block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve:

1. Blind/Pop technique- 40%
2. Nerve Stimulator- up to 85% with patient cooperation
3. U/S- 90-100%

The Lumbar plexus (Psoas) gets all 3 nerves 100% of the time if the block works. The success rate of the block is 99% even on 350 plus pounders.

Which technique do you prefer for the LFCN block?

Please don't misunderstand me. I am not advocating the use of routine lumbar plexus blocks (plus or minus a catheter) for hip replacement.

The addition of low dose morphine (duramorph) is the easiest and simplest approach. I am just quoting the published success rate for blocking the LFCN and asking which method do you all prefer?

I can tell you my success rate with the Lumbar Plexus block has been 99 percent. But, is it worth the risks?
 
The literature quotes the following for successful fascia iliaca block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve:

1. Blind/Pop technique- 40%
2. Nerve Stimulator- up to 85% with patient cooperation
3. U/S- 90-100%

The Lumbar plexus (Psoas) gets all 3 nerves 100% of the time if the block works. The success rate of the block is 99% even on 350 plus pounders.

Which technique do you prefer for the LFCN block?

Plankton,

I have been in the game a long time. I am sure your Fascia Iliaca Block rocks the boat. But, I never got above 50% with the landmark/pop method. If I go back to the block it will be with U/S after the next generation of machines come out (at this rate that may be like 6 months).

I learned the Lumbar Plexus Block at DA U a while back on a visit. They are doing them like Paris Hilton on her prom night. I can tell you it is easy after a dozen or so. But, all it takes is one SPONTANEOUS Retroperitoneal hemorrhage in an elderly patient and you get blamed.
 
Objective: To describe a complication of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) in the setting of critically ill patients. Design: Case report. Setting: The medical and surgical intensive care units of a tertiary care university teaching hospital. Patients: Two adult patients receiving enoxaparin developed retroperitoneal hematoma and abdominal compartment syndrome. Both patients became anuric and required high-dose intravenous fluids and vasopressors to maintain blood pressure. Intervention: Discontinuation of enoxaparin, followed by exploratory laparotomy and evacuation of the hematoma. Measurements and results: Immediate clinical improvement following evacuation of hematoma. Conclusions: High-risk patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin should be identified and closely monitored to prevent serious bleeding complications
 
The literature quotes the following for successful fascia iliaca block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve:

1. Blind/Pop technique- 40%
2. Nerve Stimulator- up to 85% with patient cooperation
3. U/S- 90-100%

The Lumbar plexus (Psoas) gets all 3 nerves 100% of the time if the block works. The success rate of the block is 99% even on 350 plus pounders.

Which technique do you prefer for the LFCN block?
The success of fascia iliaca blocks in my hands is close to 90% with the simple LOR technique.
It's important to use a large volume initially (40-50 cc) and to keep the hourly rate around 10 cc/hour later.
 
We do psoas blocks for almost all of our total hip replacements unless there is a reason not to. Some fascia iliaca blocks if we cannot do psoas.

However, we have established follow up procedures, INR checks, always have continuous pulse ox monitoring, a separate acute pain service with resident and nurse assigned with staff backup.

I wouldn't do them without established follow up.

If the literature shows only 40% success with Pop technique we must be extremely lucky or very good because, anecdotally, I have been rounding on fascia blocks done with pop technique for 5-6 years now and they work remarkably well.
 
procedure and technique of the FIB is described by Dalens et al. [6]. A line is drawn on the skin from pecten ossis pubis to spina iliaca anterior superior and divided in three equal parts. The puncture site is marked, 1–3 cm distal to the point where the middle and lateral third of this line meet. Arteria femoralis is identified medial to the intended puncture site (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Puncture site
 
We do psoas blocks for almost all of our total hip replacements unless there is a reason not to. Some fascia iliaca blocks if we cannot do psoas.

However, we have established follow up procedures, INR checks, always have continuous pulse ox monitoring, a separate acute pain service with resident and nurse assigned with staff backup.

I wouldn't do them without established follow up.

If the literature shows only 40% success with Pop technique we must be extremely lucky or very good because, anecdotally, I have been rounding on fascia blocks done with pop technique for 5-6 years now and they work remarkably well.


Thank you for your reply. A pubmed search using HIGH VOLUME like Plankton recommends shows an 80-90% success rate in treating post operative hip pain. I clearly need to revisit this block using Planks recommendations in this setting.

Although the trend is towards U/S guidance the double pop technique/LOR continues to be applicable for the treatment of hip pain.
 
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jul;59(7):771-6. Links

The comparison of two lower extremity block techniques combined with sciatic block: 3-in-1 femoral block vs. psoas compartment block.

Ganidagli S, Cengiz M, Baysal Z, Baktiroglu L, Sarban S.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University, School of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey. [email protected]
The objective of this study was to compare clinical and postoperative analgesic effects of femoral or psoas compartment blocks in patients undergoing arthroscopies. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Either femoral (group F) or psoas compartment (group P) block was applied followed by sciatic nerve block. All nerve blocks were provided with a 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 ml of lignocaine (lidocaine) 2%. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, and pulse oxymetry (SpO2) were recorded. Quality of anaesthesia, time to first analgesic use, verbal pain scores (VPS), sensorial and motor blockade resolution times and side effects were also recorded. Quality of anaesthesia, complete sensory blockade of obturator and lateral cutaneous nerves were higher in the group P than in group F. However, complete motor blockade findings were similar in both groups. In the group P, VPS values measured at 10 and 15 min were lower than that of group F. These values decreased at 10 min and thereafter as to baseline values. VPS values of the group F declined at 20 min and following measurement times as to baseline values. Durations of motor and sensorial block, and time to first analgesic use were similar between two groups. Total analgesic consumption at first 24 h in group P was lower than those of group F. Regarding heart rates, SpO2, SBP and DBP values, no significant differences were found between the groups. Combined psoas-sciatic technique provided more comfortable intraoperative anaesthesia and better postoperative analgesia when compared with femoral-sciatic technique for arthroscopic procedures.
 
at ucsf we place lumbar plexus catheters in all of our hips without contraindication. our orthopedics chairman came from duke, where they apparently also place lumbar plexus catheters, and is a big fan of the block. we initially did have serious complications (i think 2 unintentional subarachnoid blocks). we subsequently modified our approach to the block (we now go 5 cm lateral and 3 cm inferior to L4-5) and have had no serious complications since. we have a robust acute pain service that rounds on all theses pts daily.
 
at ucsf we place lumbar plexus catheters in all of our hips without contraindication. our orthopedics chairman came from duke, where they apparently also place lumbar plexus catheters, and is a big fan of the block. we initially did have serious complications (i think 2 unintentional subarachnoid blocks). we subsequently modified our approach to the block (we now go 5 cm lateral and 3 cm inferior to L4-5) and have had no serious complications since. we have a robust acute pain service that rounds on all theses pts daily.

Our newest partner comes from Duke. He is not a fan of the LPB.
 
Like a lot of things people like to make a big fuss to make them seem more important or because they are scared. I've done about 10-15 of them and i would feel comfortable of doing them without supervision.
If you follow a couple of simple steps there's no reason to have an adverse event (kind of like causing a pneumo with a infra-clav.)

Epidural spread is infrequent if you inject at pressures < 20 psi:


Anesthesiology:
October 2008 - Volume 109 - Issue 4 - pp 683-688
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818631a7
Pain Medicine
Lumbar Plexus Block Using High-pressure Injection Leads to Contralateral and Epidural Spread
 
Plankton,

For single shot, what needle do you prefer? Thanks.

If you look at the picture you posted you will notice that the puncture site is actually in the femoral crease 2 finger width lateral to the femoral artery, so here comes the secret and I will say it only once:
All you need is the femoral pulse and two finger width lateral to it.
No triangles, no marking pens or any of that fancy stuff, just the femoral artery and 2 fingers is all you meed to do this basic block.
As for which needle to use you should use the dullest needle you can find:
I use a dull # 18 needle intended to draw medications from vials.
You could use a tuhoy or a nerve stimulator needle.
Just my 2 cents.
 
If you look at the picture you posted you will notice that the puncture site is actually in the femoral crease 2 finger width lateral to the femoral artery, so here comes the secret and I will say it only once:
All you need is the femoral pulse and two finger width lateral to it.
No triangles, no marking pens or any of that fancy stuff, just the femoral artery and 2 fingers is all you meed to do this basic block.
As for which needle to use you should use the dullest needle you can find:
I use a dull # 18 needle intended to draw medications from vials.
You could use a tuhoy or a nerve stimulator needle.
Just my 2 cents.

Thank You. I appreciate the reply.
 
Top