- Joined
- Jul 19, 2007
- Messages
- 427
- Reaction score
- 558
For those that use cooled, do you place parallel or perpendicular? Is parallel considered inferior given the lesion size and shape, or just takes a little longer and thus what's the point?
PerpendicularFor those that use cooled, do you place parallel or perpendicular? Is parallel considered inferior given the lesion size and shape, or just takes a little longer and thus what's the point?
just to be clear, the study MD87 posted does not discuss parallel (apparently, advanced Australian) vs perpendicular (early Australian)
i seem to remember a study that showed that saline was very effective at increasing lesion size.
View attachment 382540View attachment 382541View attachment 382542
![]()
RF TridentTM Cannulae | Diros Technology | Radiofrequency (RF) Pain Management
RF TridentTM Cannulae – Diros Technology manufactures Radiofrequency (RF) pain management and neurosurgical products.dirostech.com
Made by Diros Technology, purchased by Avanos a little bit ago. The hub rotates and deploys the tines. Lesion extends past the needle tip, allowing for direct approach for RFA. Similar idea to cooled. Needles are pricy ($160/each), but contain the electrode , and have a pigtail for giving medication. You place the needle, deploy the tines, test, inject local, and burn, without having to remove/adjust anything. My big complaint with cooled, besides price, is that the stupid cannulas don't stay in place when you remove the stylet, usually requiring redirection once you get the probe in. B/l lumbar RFA takes maybe 10 minutes? Cost doesn't make much sense compared to standard needles, but I like it so much more than cooled.
Yes, I've been doing perpendicular approach with Trident. N = 40 or so. I've seen about half back in clinic with all but 1-2 doing very well at 4 weeks. Very pleased with the ease of use, time savings, decreased painfulness of the procedure, and results.Do you do perpendicular approach with trident? Just spoke with the Avanos rep, and the recommendation from Avanos is perpendicular angle approach just like Coolief which surprised me. They said that’s the difference between Stryker venom, the latter still needing a parallel approach to the mb
Yes, I've been doing perpendicular approach with Trident. N = 40 or so. I've seen about half back in clinic with all but 1-2 doing very well at 4 weeks. Very pleased with the ease of use, time savings, decreased painfulness of the procedure, and results.
Perpendicular still doesn't make sense. Realistically you're not going to be touching all tines on os. 3 prongs really doesn't make much sense even if parallel. 2 prongs you mimic a short bipolar lesion if both on os not sure what the third prong floating around does
View attachment 383014
In the models and practice, you actually are getting a nice teardrop of heat that hugs that bone you're pushed again. Also, the mechanism of spreading/deploying the tines here is much more reliable as well with the Diros Trident or the Nimbus as compared to the hope and pray of Venom or Sidekick.Perpendicular still doesn't make sense. Realistically you're not going to be touching all tines on os. 3 prongs really doesn't make much sense even if parallel. 2 prongs you mimic a short bipolar lesion if both on os not sure what the third prong floating around does
View attachment 383014
Interesting….fact is, early proponents for RFA only did perpendicular.
regardless of what we think now, perpendicular approach must have seemed to help, otherwise RFA would never have gotten off the ground...
I had a very large patient recently who I had no choice but to do perpendicular and even with that approach, hubbed the 150mm needles at each level. I did get a nice multifidus twitch and am crossing my fingers it helps but if not I won't do it again.fact is, early proponents for RFA only did perpendicular.
regardless of what we think now, perpendicular approach must have seemed to help, otherwise RFA would never have gotten off the ground...
I've had 2 patients like this, both did great.I had a very large patient recently who I had no choice but to do perpendicular and even with that approach, hubbed the 15mm needles at each level. I did get a nice multifidus twitch and am crossing my fingers it helps but if not I won't do it again.
would anyone have simply said no even after having a successful MBB? I figured I owed it to her to at least try. Do you stop the process once you see how deep they are with the MBB?
I had a very large patient recently who I had no choice but to do perpendicular and even with that approach, hubbed the 150mm needles at each level. I did get a nice multifidus twitch and am crossing my fingers it helps but if not I won't do it again.
would anyone have simply said no even after having a successful MBB? I figured I owed it to her to at least try. Do you stop the process once you see how deep they are with the MBB?
good point, do you have a BMI cutoff for procedures? do I make her lose weight before offering a procedure that seems like it would help?Yup. Clearly the issue here is her facets. Nothing else I can imagine affecting her LBP.
Table weight limit is 500 lbs.good point, do you have a BMI cutoff for procedures? do I make her lose weight before offering a procedure that seems like it would help?
Mine too, so clinic only for those pts bc our ASC isn't allowed to do anything over 350 lbs...Table weight limit is 500 lbs.
I use 20 cm needles 1-2x/year. Not the most fun I have in the procedure room.I had a very large patient recently who I had no choice but to do perpendicular and even with that approach, hubbed the 150mm needles at each level. I did get a nice multifidus twitch and am crossing my fingers it helps but if not I won't do it again.
would anyone have simply said no even after having a successful MBB? I figured I owed it to her to at least try. Do you stop the process once you see how deep they are with the MBB?
good point, do you have a BMI cutoff for procedures? do I make her lose weight before offering a procedure that seems like it would help?
I use 20 cm needles 1-2x/year. Not the most fun I have in the procedure room.
Second one failed...haha.I had a large lady that required perpendicular approach with 150mm probes hubbed. Fortunately, had access to Coolief at that time. She showed up in my office over a year later, 75 lbs. lighter and wanting another RFA. This time it was standard approach and routine. YMMV.
When you go perpendicular are you landing at the "eye" of the scotty dog or are you going down in AP to the SAP/TP junction and hitting that corner. Thanks!Yes, I've been doing perpendicular approach with Trident. N = 40 or so. I've seen about half back in clinic with all but 1-2 doing very well at 4 weeks. Very pleased with the ease of use, time savings, decreased painfulness of the procedure, and results.
Yes, I usually oblique 25*, no tilt, and land at the eye. No worries about bulky facets getting in the way.When you go perpendicular are you landing at the "eye" of the scotty dog or are you going down in AP to the SAP/TP junction and hitting that corner. Thanks!
Yes, I usually oblique 25*, no tilt, and land at the eye. No worries about bulky facets getting in the way.
Went through and took a quick random sample.Man, wish people would post more of their own pics- either suboptimal or regular pics.
Not ideal spines
Went through and took a quick random sample.
agreed. Though if I look on target on AP, 15-20 oblique, and then 30 oblique…. I leave it alone.Some of these seem shallow.
this patient followed up with my PA today, 90% relief. must say I'm surprised with this one.I had a very large patient recently who I had no choice but to do perpendicular and even with that approach, hubbed the 150mm needles at each level. I did get a nice multifidus twitch and am crossing my fingers it helps but if not I won't do it again.
would anyone have simply said no even after having a successful MBB? I figured I owed it to her to at least try. Do you stop the process once you see how deep they are with the MBB?
He liked you and no one else took his pain seriously..this patient followed up with my PA today, 90% relief. must say I'm surprised with this one.
I’ve one used it for my SIJ RFAs. Haven’t found it to be time or cost efficient for lumbar or cervicalFor those doing mostly cooled, is there a downside to trying to place the needle parallel or at least in between parallel and perpendicular to the nerve? I find sometimes placing perpendicular leads me to be further away on lateral than I'd like. The Coolief reps claim it produces substantial "distal projection" of the burn, but just how much? Anyone have pics of patients with good results from their cooled approaches?
For those doing mostly cooled, is there a downside to trying to place the needle parallel or at least in between parallel and perpendicular to the nerve? I find sometimes placing perpendicular leads me to be further away on lateral than I'd like. The Coolief reps claim it produces substantial "distal projection" of the burn, but just how much? Anyone have pics of patients with good results from their cooled approaches?
Have you tried the cooled probe/temp with more conventional placement?Didn’t do water cooled in residency but picked it up right away at our HOPD gig. Avanos procedure guide instructs to target the medial aspect of the SAP. Lateral images always looked too superficial and not near the SAP-TP junction. And you’re def not getting enough distal projection. After some questionable results, I returned to conventional and implemented the techniques described here i.e needle parallel to nerve and results have been solid. Consider returning to conventional RFA.
Have you tried the cooled probe/temp with more conventional placement?
Yes that's what I struggle with. Sometimes if I try to get adequate depth I am way off the junction. Other times it has worked out.No because conventional benefits from the curved needle. Can hug os better. With cooled, straight needle, once you walk off then you gone
If the needle ends up lateral to the junction when you get deep enough that suggests your approach was too medial and the posterior edge of the facet is in the way, so it deflects the needle lateral.Yes that's what I struggle with. Sometimes if I try to get adequate depth I am way off the junction. Other times it has worked out.
My results have been fine for the most part but on the occasional failure I wonder if it's because of these depth/placement issues.
Understood, my main question remains what does ideal placement of Coolief probes look like for others who've had consistent success?If the needle ends up lateral to the junction when you get deep enough that suggests your approach was too medial and the posterior edge of the facet is in the way, so it deflects the needle lateral.