- Joined
- Jun 22, 2004
- Messages
- 556
- Reaction score
- 632
Here's one for you: Yesterday I had a patient for a flex sig under sedation. Pt had eaten a full breakfast 6 hrs before. I said gotta wait until NPO 8 hours. GI doc says nevermind, I'll do it without sedation. Great! I'm not involved, no meds are going to be given, have at it. This still requires an OR nurse to be in there to monitor the patient. OR nursing director comes to me saying his nurses cannot monitor patients in the OR because they are apparently not ACLS trained (union issue, I guess?). He asks me to have a CRNA monitor the patient with me medically directing, in order to get the case done. GI doc still has a number of scopes to do and we can easily move patient to the end of the schedule where he will be >8 hr NPO. I tell the nursing director I won't subject the pt to an anesthesia charge to not provide any anesthesia, especially since the GI doc and the patient have decided that no sedation is OK and the wait time is 2 hrs. OR director keeps hassling me, so I gather the GI doc and the patient in the room and tell them our options:
1-go back now, receive no sedation, get a bill from me that his insurance may or may not pay
2-go back in 2 hrs and receive the scheduled sedation
3-reschedule with or without sedation
Everybody thinks the first option is ridiculous and we go with option 2. Anybody ever do monitoring with no anesthesia (not talking about vented, plug-and-play ICU patients)? Anyway, it sounded stupid to me so I didn't do it.
1-go back now, receive no sedation, get a bill from me that his insurance may or may not pay
2-go back in 2 hrs and receive the scheduled sedation
3-reschedule with or without sedation
Everybody thinks the first option is ridiculous and we go with option 2. Anybody ever do monitoring with no anesthesia (not talking about vented, plug-and-play ICU patients)? Anyway, it sounded stupid to me so I didn't do it.