- Joined
- Jun 11, 2003
- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 1
I've been hearing how EM malpractice rates are pretty darn high...besides neurosurg, ob, and ortho.
Why so high? It would seem to me that because of the nature of the ER, most patients would be happy just to have someone available to help them...how can anyone think that an ER doc would intentionally or carelessly screw a patient over in a critical situation where outcomes are variable to begin with? And how would anyone in a court of law even try to make such a claim?
Maybe I'm just not understanding exactly on what grounds you can sue a doc for "malpractice"...but intrinsically it seems that ER docs shouldn't have such high rates. I mean, even if mistakes are made in a critical situation, members of the legal community/patients have to realize that the ER isn't a nice, calm office where a patient's particulars can be pondered over before arriving at a plan-of-action...don't they see this?!?!?!?!? <sigh>
any insights would be appreciated.
Why so high? It would seem to me that because of the nature of the ER, most patients would be happy just to have someone available to help them...how can anyone think that an ER doc would intentionally or carelessly screw a patient over in a critical situation where outcomes are variable to begin with? And how would anyone in a court of law even try to make such a claim?
Maybe I'm just not understanding exactly on what grounds you can sue a doc for "malpractice"...but intrinsically it seems that ER docs shouldn't have such high rates. I mean, even if mistakes are made in a critical situation, members of the legal community/patients have to realize that the ER isn't a nice, calm office where a patient's particulars can be pondered over before arriving at a plan-of-action...don't they see this?!?!?!?!? <sigh>
any insights would be appreciated.