Marcus Gunn Pupil

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

MudPhud20XX

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
193
So I am getting confused with diff descriptions about MGP. So one book says you get minimal bilateral constriction when light is shine in the affected pupil whereas the other book says you get a relative dilation of both eyes. What is going on? Also, can anyone just explain these for me? Many thanks in advance.

Members don't see this ad.
 

dfib slim

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2012
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
1,046
If you shine a light in the bad eye first you may get minimal constriction of both eyes.

If you shine in the good eye first both will constrict but when you swing to the other eye the light doesn't register so you get relative dilation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

syma

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
194
Reaction score
48
So I am getting confused with diff descriptions about MGP. So one book says you get minimal bilateral constriction when light is shine in the affected pupil whereas the other book says you get a relative dilation of both eyes. What is going on? Also, can anyone just explain these for me? Many thanks in advance.


Those mean the same things.

You have a relative afferent pupillary defect.

Assume the right eye is the eye with the problem. With the swinging light test, when you shine the light into the right eye, you will get mild bilateral constriction. Certainly less than you expect

When you shine the light into the left eye you will get bilateral fully expected constriction. And noticeably because it was not fully constricted before.

Swing back to the right eye, and you get what appears to be dilation, swing back to the left eye, you get what appears to be constriction. Rinse and repeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top