What are people saying about this new Step 2 resource? Amazon rates it highly but it seems inflated because most of the ratings appear to come from former Conrad Fischer students, as though he told all his students to go on amazon and rate his book highly. Is anybody using this?
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step II Master the Boards Step 2
Started by sarsmon
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
There are a lot of posts about this book in this thread:What are people saying about this new Step 2 resource? Amazon rates it highly but it seems inflated because most of the ratings appear to come from former Conrad Fischer students, as though he told all his students to go on amazon and rate his book highly. Is anybody using this?
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=777468
What are people saying about this new Step 2 resource? Amazon rates it highly but it seems inflated because most of the ratings appear to come from former Conrad Fischer students, as though he told all his students to go on amazon and rate his book highly. Is anybody using this?
The book is excellent, imo. That thread cited is a little misleading, because the Step 2 version of MTBs just came out, and before that people swore by the Step 3 MTBs book.
The Step 2 version places much more emphasis on "what's the most likely diagnosis?" - and is much better for the CK than the Step 3 book.
I've looked at the other books in the thread mentioned, and honestly nothing compares to MTBs. MTBs is basically 70-80% of what is covered in the videos/live lectures but in written form. It's not always explained in detail (if you want that, the red books do the job - but are MUCH longer of course). It's very high yield - I read the OB section the night before my exam, and it helped on nearly every question.
VERY good book. Must have.
The book is excellent, imo. That thread cited is a little misleading, because the Step 2 version of MTBs just came out, and before that people swore by the Step 3 MTBs book.
The Step 2 version places much more emphasis on "what's the most likely diagnosis?" - and is much better for the CK than the Step 3 book.
I've looked at the other books in the thread mentioned, and honestly nothing compares to MTBs. MTBs is basically 70-80% of what is covered in the videos/live lectures but in written form. It's not always explained in detail (if you want that, the red books do the job - but are MUCH longer of course). It's very high yield - I read the OB section the night before my exam, and it helped on nearly every question.
VERY good book. Must have.
thanks that's helpful. I'll use it and if I need more detail somewhere I can always find it in a bigger book
Well MTB 2 has yet to prove its worth.
GYN is ultra succint.
GYN is ultra succint.