Math destroyer vs. DAT destroyer
Started by SodiumChanel
yeah i feel the same way..math in regular destroyer felt easier than math destroyer 🙁
Anyone ever used only DAT destroyer math section and score above 20?
from what I read in many of the breakdowns here - math destroyer is a must.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
They are both great sources. Destroyer will prepare you very well. It is tough. However, you may get an easy or a hard version of the actuall DAT exam. I would study the hard stuff just be be safe.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
I actually never looked over the DAT Destroyer math portion, just did Math Destroyer.
I got a 20 on the actual exam, but I was getting usually 35 - 37 correct on timed math destroyer tests. My actual DAT test was not very similar to math destroyer, so that was frustrating to me and probably explained why I didn't score as high as I'd have liked.
I got a 20 on the actual exam, but I was getting usually 35 - 37 correct on timed math destroyer tests. My actual DAT test was not very similar to math destroyer, so that was frustrating to me and probably explained why I didn't score as high as I'd have liked.
babowc! how was your dAT?? wasn't it today?
and what do you mean 10th of the thing?
ah sorry, I wasn't clear.
I used maybe 10th of the formulas/examples from MATH destroyer, on the real test.
Math destroyer will overprepare you, which is a good thing. But make sure you know how to do SIMPLE questions.. destroyer doesn't go over the simple ones, because they're simple.
But, in actuality, the real DAT is composed of simple questions.
There's no problem with 45 minutes, but you have to be efficient at calculating simple questions, which I was completely un-exposed to... hence the 19 :/
I had zero probability, permutation, and combination problems.
I had many average velocity, distance, combined work, and other simpler questions.
Similar threads
