Math Question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

hashemiaan

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
LA
  1. Pre-Dental
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
The prizes in a penny arcade game are worth 5¢, 50¢,and $2.00. The game costs 25¢ and pays out half that amount on the average. If one prize is awarded for each 25¢ game, and there is the same number of 50¢ prizes as $2.00 prizes, how many $2.00 prizes are there in 160 drawings having the average payoff?

so i don't get this question. can someone help me out? 😱😱
 
I also have this question as well.
How many of the three-digit numbers containing no​
digits other than 2, 3 or 4 are divisible by 3?

Thanks
 
The prizes in a penny arcade game are worth 5¢, 50¢,and $2.00. The game costs 25¢ and pays out half that amount on the average. If one prize is awarded for each 25¢ game, and there is the same number of 50¢ prizes as $2.00 prizes, how many $2.00 prizes are there in 160 drawings having the average payoff?

so i don't get this question. can someone help me out? 😱😱
The game pays off 12.5 cents each game on average. There are 160 drawings which means $20 is won in total (12.5 cents x 160 = 20 dollars).

There are the same amount of 50 cent and 2 dollar prizes. And you know you have x number of 5 cent wins, y number of 50 cent wins, and z number of 2 dollar wins. So y = z. you also know that x + y + z = 160 and 5x + 50y + 200z = 2000.

So with all of that, you are left with x + 2z = 160, and 5x + 250z = 2000.

Change the first equation by multiplying by -5. You get:

-5x - 10z = -800
5x + 250z = 2000

Add them.

240z = 1200
z = 5

So y = 5 and x = 150.

So you have 150 of the 5 cent wins, 5 of the 50 cent wins, and 5 of the 2 dollar wins.

If you take the average, you get 150*.05 + 5*.50 + 5*2.00 = 7.50 + 2.50 + 10.00 = 20.00. Divide that by 160 and you get your 12.5.
 
I also have this question as well.
How many of the three-digit numbers containing no​
digits other than 2, 3 or 4 are divisible by 3?

Thanks
222
333
444
223
224
332
334
442
443
234

That's all the possible combos of numbers. Of those, 222, 333, 444, and 234 work. The rest don't.

You need to consider all rearrangements of those. Only 234 can be rearranged, and you can do it 6 different ways (234, 243, 324, etc). So there are 9 ways.
 
I dont understand streetwolf's response.

I tried to figure out some sort of combination or permutation thing, but it doesn't seem to work. so I took the brute force route...

222 333 444
223 224
332 334
443 442
242 232
323 343
434 424
234 243 324 342 423 432

thats 21 numbers!!! there is NO WAY I can divide all these numbers by 3 in my head within even 5 minutes!! if this is really a possible question, I'm completely and utterly screwed...

using a calculator, the answer is 9. and by using this method I have realized a pattern. none of the middle numbers work. only numbers with either all the same digit, or containing all three different digits work.

had I not done this problem before hand, I would NEVER have been able to deduced this during an exam.

please PLEASE explain a different way to go about this that takes less effort, more reason...
 
In order for a number to be divisible by 3, the sum of the numbers must be divisible by 3. For example:

222-2+2+2=6. 6 is divisible by 3

4+4+4=12. 12 is divisible by 3

4+3+3=10. 10 is not divisible by 3.

Hope that helps!
 
In order for a number to be divisible by 3, the sum of the numbers must be divisible by 3. For example:

222-2+2+2=6. 6 is divisible by 3

4+4+4=12. 12 is divisible by 3

4+3+3=10. 10 is not divisible by 3.

Hope that helps!

you're a genius!! but if you could explain what the sum of individual numbers and the division of them being within a number have to do with one another, I'd be ecstatic!
 
Genius is a stretch! I'm just lucky to have a math major for a best friend and roommate! I have no clue why it works, I just know that it does. (Sounds like my thesis research! ) Take a look online for divisibility rules. There are lots of them. It should make solving problems like that one a lot less tricky.
 
you're a genius!! but if you could explain what the sum of individual numbers and the division of them being within a number have to do with one another, I'd be ecstatic!

Why are you being sarcastic?
It is a fact, add up the numbers of a 3 digit number (or any n digit number) and if they are divisible by 3 then the entire number is divisible by 3.

Streetwolf's way is simple,
add up 3 2s, 3 3s, or 3 4s, or 2+3+4 and they all are divisible by 3.
So how many ways can you arrange 222 or 333 or 444, only 1 way each.
as for 234, you can arrange it 3+2+1 ways
so total is 6+3= 9 ways and shouldn't take more than about half a min at most.
I didn't understand the first problem, sorry.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Why are you being sarcastic?
It is a fact, add up the numbers of a 3 digit number (or any n digit number) and if they are divisible by 3 then the entire number is divisible by 3.

Streetwolf's way is simple,
add up 3 2s, 3 3s, or 3 4s, or 2+3+4 and they all are divisible by 3.
So how many ways can you arrange 222 or 333 or 444, only 1 way each.
as for 234, you can arrange it 3+2+1 ways
so total is 6+3= 9 ways and shouldn't take more than about half a min at most.
I didn't understand the first problem, sorry.
Actually it's 3*2*1 ways.

Theorem: A number is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.

Proof: I'm not proving this both ways as in a formal proof but this should convince you. Most of the time you add up the digits and if they add up to a number that is divisible by 3, then the entire number is divisible by 3. So I'm proving this in that direction: If the sum of a number's digits is divisible by 3, then the number itself is divisible by 3.

Say you have a number with any amount of digits in it (so 3125 has 4 digits, the number 8 has 1 digit, etc). Now consider each digit separately. Let the first digit be x1, the second x2, the third x3, and so on. The last digit is x👎 where n = the number of digits in the number.

So the number is represented by x👎 + 10*x(n-1) + 100*x(n-2) + ... + 10^(n-1)*x1.

For example you could write 35,662 as: 2 + 10*6 + 100*6 + 1000*5 + 10000*3.

Now rewrite this as x👎 + 9x(n-1) + x(n-1) + 99x(n-2) + x(n-2) + 999x(n-3) + x(n-3) + ...

You get x👎 + x(n-1) + ... + x2 + x1 + 9x(n-1) + 99x(n-2) + 999x(n-3) + ...

Obviously all the terms with the 9s in them are divisible by 3. And we know that x👎 + x(n-1) + ... + x2 + x1 is divisible by 3 because that's just the sum of the digits (remember that the condition here is that the sum of the digits is divisible by 3). So when the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, the number itself is divisible by 3.


That applies to this problem because you need a quick way to figure out what's divisible by 3 and what isn't.

Since we're working with 3 digit numbers, if you have the same digit 3 times it will certainly be divisible by 3. Also since you have 3 consecutive numbers, using each once will give you a number divisible by 3. No other combination of the digits will work. It HAS to be those 2 cases.

Since you can only use 222, 333, and 444 as those 3 numbers, they only count as 3 possibilities. But 234 can be arranged in 6 different ways: you can pick any of the 3 for the 1st digit, any of the remaining 2 for the second digit, and you're stuck with the 3rd for the 3rd digit. That's 3*2*1 = 6.
 
Actually it's 3*2*1 ways.

Theorem: A number is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.

Proof: I'm not proving this both ways as in a formal proof but this should convince you. Most of the time you add up the digits and if they add up to a number that is divisible by 3, then the entire number is divisible by 3. So I'm proving this in that direction: If the sum of a number's digits is divisible by 3, then the number itself is divisible by 3.

Say you have a number with any amount of digits in it (so 3125 has 4 digits, the number 8 has 1 digit, etc). Now consider each digit separately. Let the first digit be x1, the second x2, the third x3, and so on. The last digit is x👎 where n = the number of digits in the number.

So the number is represented by x👎 + 10*x(n-1) + 100*x(n-2) + ... + 10^(n-1)*x1.

For example you could write 35,662 as: 2 + 10*6 + 100*6 + 1000*5 + 10000*3.

Now rewrite this as x👎 + 9x(n-1) + x(n-1) + 99x(n-2) + x(n-2) + 999x(n-3) + x(n-3) + ...

You get x👎 + x(n-1) + ... + x2 + x1 + 9x(n-1) + 99x(n-2) + 999x(n-3) + ...

Obviously all the terms with the 9s in them are divisible by 3. And we know that x👎 + x(n-1) + ... + x2 + x1 is divisible by 3 because that's just the sum of the digits (remember that the condition here is that the sum of the digits is divisible by 3). So when the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, the number itself is divisible by 3.


That applies to this problem because you need a quick way to figure out what's divisible by 3 and what isn't.

Since we're working with 3 digit numbers, if you have the same digit 3 times it will certainly be divisible by 3. Also since you have 3 consecutive numbers, using each once will give you a number divisible by 3. No other combination of the digits will work. It HAS to be those 2 cases.

Since you can only use 222, 333, and 444 as those 3 numbers, they only count as 3 possibilities. But 234 can be arranged in 6 different ways: you can pick any of the 3 for the 1st digit, any of the remaining 2 for the second digit, and you're stuck with the 3rd for the 3rd digit. That's 3*2*1 = 6.

This has already been beaten to death. Why are you trying to re-explain it? Besides other posts are much quicker ways and therefore more helpful.
 
Thanks but if you go and read it more carefully I'm actually explaining why when the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3 the number itself is divisible by 3. Someone here was wondering.

The answer to the OPs question was written again in the last 2 mini paragraphs and was a restatement of what I wrote in a previous post.
 
I think you guys are missing a major point here. Where does a penny arcade get off charging a quarter for a game? That's blatant fraud and grounds for a class action lawsuit. Therefore, add to the $20 payoff the cost of damages and penalties.
 
The way i would do the first question is

(.50x+2.00x+.05{160-2x})/160=.125

Solving for x gives us (2.4x+8)/160=.125

Solving for x we get 2.4X=12
therefore X=5
 
This has already been beaten to death. Why are you trying to re-explain it? Besides other posts are much quicker ways and therefore more helpful.

No one is more helpful than StreetWolf.
 
Top Bottom