MCAT 2015: New Scoring Scale

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Well since we are the United States, we might as well keep using random ass scales. 1-100 is too mainstream

Actually it is precisely because we are the US and have so many fricking standardized tests that we must use "random ass" numbers to prevent any confusion between the exams lol. However, this scale isn't totally random, it is designed to do something
 
Actually it is precisely because we are the US and have so many fricking standardized tests that we must use "random ass" numbers to prevent any confusion between the exams lol. However, this scale isn't totally random, it is designed to do something

True lol. But if we judge how good these random scores are by percentile, why can't we just report and use percentiles? I am pretty sure 90th percentile (insert test name) is much more streamlined and meaningful than "32 MCAT" or "169 LSAT" or "2000 SAT" and it means the same thing

(I didnt actually pick the 90th percentile for those tests, they are just random guesses)
 
True lol. But if we judge how good these random scores are by percentile, why can't we just report and use percentiles? I am pretty sure 90th percentile (insert test name) is much more streamlined and meaningful than "32 MCAT" or "169 LSAT" or "2000 SAT" and it means the same thing

(I didnt actually pick the 90th percentile for those tests, they are just random guesses)

Yah that would make sense to me as well.....but it wouldn't be as fun.
 
Top Bottom