- Joined
- Aug 9, 2006
- Messages
- 52
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Medical Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I can only speak for berkeley review and princeton review, as those are the only materials I have done extensive passages with.
For princeton review hyperlearning, it seems like a majority of the questions are just free-standing. I can answer most of the questions with- out reading the passages. Now, I have only done organic passages and biology passages. Dont get me wrong, I mean I get questions wrong that if I would have refered back to the passage I would not have got it wrong. The only passages where I actually routinely go back to the passages are the ones where they are like "experiment 1", "experiment 2", and "experiment 3". Other than that it seems like most of the questions are just freestanding.
As for Berkeley review I have only done physical science books, gen chem and physics. This trend is not as prevalent with these books. But definitely still present. The only stuff I use from the passages is an equation if its given and the data and graphs. Other than that, which does account for a majority of the problems.. There are still a fair share of questions that can be answered with out any passage info.
Is this how the real MCAT will be? Also, the passages do give a lot of info about the background of the subject that we are sopposed to already know. Will this also be true on the mcat?
For princeton review hyperlearning, it seems like a majority of the questions are just free-standing. I can answer most of the questions with- out reading the passages. Now, I have only done organic passages and biology passages. Dont get me wrong, I mean I get questions wrong that if I would have refered back to the passage I would not have got it wrong. The only passages where I actually routinely go back to the passages are the ones where they are like "experiment 1", "experiment 2", and "experiment 3". Other than that it seems like most of the questions are just freestanding.
As for Berkeley review I have only done physical science books, gen chem and physics. This trend is not as prevalent with these books. But definitely still present. The only stuff I use from the passages is an equation if its given and the data and graphs. Other than that, which does account for a majority of the problems.. There are still a fair share of questions that can be answered with out any passage info.
Is this how the real MCAT will be? Also, the passages do give a lot of info about the background of the subject that we are sopposed to already know. Will this also be true on the mcat?
Last edited:
