MCAT VR --- Getting the MAIN IDEA

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Dr Gerrard

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
2
All right. I have determined that the problem many have on the VR section is that they are having trouble figuring out the main idea of the passage.

What are some tips to help those that struggle with the main idea with this area?

What exactly does EK mean by finding the main idea? This sounds so easy to do, something one did in middle school english, that many, including myself, just ignore this aspect and believe that this is not their problem.
 
I believe that it's quite difficult to obtain the "exact" main idea from the passage. That's why I pay close attention to eliminating 3 answers to get to that one answer all the time because I can def. look at ideas in relation to each other and see the comparisons of right and wrongs. So, I usually think "relative" instead of "exact."

Also, when I read paragraphs, I try to make connections between the first sentence that i read and the next sentence. I try to look at each sentence in relation to each other (ex. usually you'll see a main point at the beginning of the sentence (not all the time) and then you'll see the supports throughout the paragraph). Each sentence or idea seems to point a direction towards what the main idea is. Sometimes this is tricky. For example, the beginning of the sentence may start out talking about events that led up to a war but then the rest of the paragraph talks about the weapons used in the war. So, obviously the main idea has more to do with weapons of war instead of the events that led up to it.

So when I read main idea questions, I always ask myself "what did the author spend his/her time talking about the most?" The author could have picked "any" direction but they chose that specific direction. So, as you read the answers, you'll start to eliminate answers because "this wasn't what the author spent most of his/her time talking about."

Instead of calling it "main idea," I kind of like to call it "direction" that a passage takes. Warning though, Just paying attention to the structure isn't good enough, you have to really say to yourself "ok i'm going to focus and concentrate on this specific passage and try to comprehend what this author is saying." Usually when I work on verbal, I feel very uncomfortable in that I try to zone in and focus entirely on the passage that I am reading. Like someone said on this post, verbal is like working a muscle in that you have to work it out frequently and even push it further to improve. I'm counting on this basic idea over any other tricks that I came up with. I've tried highlighting, writing a few sentences down to summarize paragraphs, and even assumed that you could work your way through finding the wrong answers by studying the type of wrong answers. These little bitty tricks don't do you any good in that they sometimes steal attention away from comprehending the passage. Although I do see the value in spending a few seconds processing what you just read as you read the passages.

hm... ok i wrote too much... but that's my opinion of the main idea thing.
 
I believe that it's quite difficult to obtain the "exact" main idea from the passage. That's why I pay close attention to eliminating 3 answers to get to that one answer all the time because I can def. look at ideas in relation to each other and see the comparisons of right and wrongs. So, I usually think "relative" instead of "exact."

Also, when I read paragraphs, I try to make connections between the first sentence that i read and the next sentence. I try to look at each sentence in relation to each other (ex. usually you'll see a main point at the beginning of the sentence (not all the time) and then you'll see the supports throughout the paragraph). Each sentence or idea seems to point a direction towards what the main idea is. Sometimes this is tricky. For example, the beginning of the sentence may start out talking about events that led up to a war but then the rest of the paragraph talks about the weapons used in the war. So, obviously the main idea has more to do with weapons of war instead of the events that led up to it.

So when I read main idea questions, I always ask myself "what did the author spend his/her time talking about the most?" The author could have picked "any" direction but they chose that specific direction. So, as you read the answers, you'll start to eliminate answers because "this wasn't what the author spent most of his/her time talking about."

Instead of calling it "main idea," I kind of like to call it "direction" that a passage takes. Warning though, Just paying attention to the structure isn't good enough, you have to really say to yourself "ok i'm going to focus and concentrate on this specific passage and try to comprehend what this author is saying." Usually when I work on verbal, I feel very uncomfortable in that I try to zone in and focus entirely on the passage that I am reading. Like someone said on this post, verbal is like working a muscle in that you have to work it out frequently and even push it further to improve. I'm counting on this basic idea over any other tricks that I came up with. I've tried highlighting, writing a few sentences down to summarize paragraphs, and even assumed that you could work your way through finding the wrong answers by studying the type of wrong answers. These little bitty tricks don't do you any good in that they sometimes steal attention away from comprehending the passage. Although I do see the value in spending a few seconds processing what you just read as you read the passages.

hm... ok i wrote too much... but that's my opinion of the main idea thing.

You've got a good method.

Each passage has a Topic, Scope, and Purpose. The scope/purpose are good at helping knock off answers that can't be correct. The scope should be thought of as the "boundaries" of the passage. Any global question has to fall within the scope. Those that fall outside are by definition wrong.
 
A lot of the passages include a lengthy intro which usually only serves as an example or an analogy to their main point. Make sure you can identify when the first few paragraphs are simply there to explain the author's main point, which may not be introduced until later in the passage.
 
Wow! All of this is so helpful.

However, this always happens to me. I go through a passage, don't do so well, and then come out thinking I know all of my mistakes and that I am going to kill the next one.
 
Got a question to pose to all of you guys.

I have determined my biggest problem in VR is that I can't find out what the main idea is. I go ahead and read and read and read but I can't construct the main idea from the passage. I know what its about but when I'm asked to come up with the main idea, I tend to distort it from what its supposed to be.

Oftentimes, I choose a main idea which is neutral and if I pick something that is author's opinion then I get screwed. Is there any remedy for this?
 
Top