mcat

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drabberbadge

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
600
Reaction score
43
Hi, I want to start off saying I got a 497 on the new MCAT twice 40%, unfortunately. I know this kind of screws up my chances but I really do not want to give up. I was thinking about going in for one more go to try to do well on this test. I know this sounds like an excuse but the first time around, I did not really study and took and scored the exam , the second time I was completing my masters so I did not focus as much as I should ahve.What would you recommend me to do to putmy all into it? Does it help studying from the textbook? Is it hopeless since itll be my 3rd time?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Assuming your cGPA and sGPA were fine, it is not hopeless. The feedback that a few friends and I received during this past cycle from about 12 different adcoms; would be best to ensure you are fully prepared for the test before taking it a 2nd/3rd time. Get a good score (512+) on your third time and it should be alright for low to mid-tier. Anything above (4th 5th, 6th attempt) that with low scores then a great score only brings into question your actual ability vs simple luck.

There are probably some here who could offer even better insight. Check out the other threads on here for study advice but only you know what works for you. Take a prep course if you need structure and someone to hold you accountable.
 
Last edited:
If you performed similarly your first two times, then it's a matter of study habit. You shouldn't keep studying the same way - you need to find what works for you. And you shouldn't take it until you are fully comfortable with it.

In terms of content review, you should pick a company's content review books and stick with it. Most companies prepare you similarly well for content review though some may go about it in a more roundabout way. So go through those books carefully, with a mind towards the bigger picture. Now, the new MCAT tests mainly on scientific/logical reasoning skills based on that content knowledge. So you need to be able to apply your reasoning and logic skills towards MCAT-type questions. Therefore, you should do a lot of FLs to get the feel for the MCAT. These will also help you gauge your performance.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Just to get a better idea, which practice tests were you using, how many did you do, what was your test-taking and reviewing schedule like?
 
same to me,I was using Princeton 2015 books,thanks
2.gif
 
have you analyzed your AMCAS practice tests in detail? I found that people who spent significant amount of time analyzing all questions and answers (those they got wrong and correct) improved their score significantly. You need to find out if you just need to improve your critical thinking or you need to improve your basic science knowledge. Most of the time, critical thinking can be improved and once you analyze and study the mcat style and the passages, you will master the mcat. Many of the mcat answers can be found directly from the passages and they require basic science knowledge to come to an answer. I would recommend analyzing your practice tests and studying why you got the questions wrong.
 
I definitely think that it's not hopeless try again. I know a lot of people who've done the same with big success.
 
Most companies prepare you similarly well for content review though some may go about it in a more roundabout way. So go through those books carefully, with a mind towards the bigger picture. Now, the new MCAT tests mainly on scientific/logical reasoning skills based on that content knowledge. So you need to be able to apply your reasoning and logic skills towards MCAT-type questions. Therefore, you should do a lot of FLs to get the feel for the MCAT. These will also help you gauge your performance.

Most companies, but not all. The problem as I've seen it over the years, with the old MCAT as well as the new one, is that people read content from a simplified review source and they get a false sense of confidence that they understand the topics. Recalling definitions and knowing facts make a student believe they are making progress, but it's often not the case. As you point out, it's all about applications. Getting better at applying information is key. But it needs to start LONG before FLs. You should be doing this from day one. It is painful at first, but after a little while you get into the flow and you start getting very good at answering questions that mix seemingly unrelated topics.

When studying, never ask "what is the minimal amount I need to know." You have defeated yourself before you start. When choosing materials to build a preparation plan around look at the passages and the answer explanations, not the text. You do your best learning when you review questions after you've done a homework set or practice exam. Thorough review of each question is important, and this is why answer explanations are the single most important feature in whatever material you use for review. Not the length of the explanations but their utility. You have to learn how to think your way through questions, so good explanations go through the "why" for the best answer as well as the "why not" for the other answers.

There are some people, probably about 25% of the MCAT population, that can study from anything and do well. They get great scores no matter what they use. When they post their techniques and strategies, it's not always applicable. You need to find out what works best for you using trial and error and an honest assessment of your strengths and weaknesses.

What was so impressive about SN2ed was that he took the MCAT once, didn't do very well, and then made a completely new game plan based on what he summarized from SDN threads. His score obviously went up enough that he got into medical school (done by now probably). His suggestions are awesome in terms of what you need to do. You need to do tons and tons of passages and invest most of your time in a thorough postgame analysis of every question.

A good MCAT takes work and smart use of your time. Highlighting, flashcards, and equation lists are very low yield on this exam. Practicing with a broad range of passages is high yield.
 
Most companies, but not all. The problem as I've seen it over the years, with the old MCAT as well as the new one, is that people read content from a simplified review source and they get a false sense of confidence that they understand the topics. Recalling definitions and knowing facts make a student believe they are making progress, but it's often not the case. As you point out, it's all about applications. Getting better at applying information is key. But it needs to start LONG before FLs. You should be doing this from day one. It is painful at first, but after a little while you get into the flow and you start getting very good at answering questions that mix seemingly unrelated topics.

I completely agree with your applications-based response and that is how I feel. I would recommend using Khan Academy to do passages before FLs though, and perhaps Section Bank although one might want to save that for later. However, I do not believe that any test prep company now has resources that can give students representative practice integrating concepts in a format similar to the real MCAT. My own experience with test prep companies is not exhaustive and I can only claim experience with Kaplan, TPR, NS, and EK along with AAMC and Khan Academy.
 
Top