- Joined
- Dec 27, 2019
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 10
I was recently at an MD/PhD interview with another student who shares very similar research interests. It made me wonder whether schools consciously try to diversify the interests of each of their incoming classes and avoid admitting people with similar interests. This question is just pure curiosity; Although I obviously want to get into the school, I am well aware that there is not much I can do if it is the case that they will only take one student with our shared interest.
It seems difficult because it is very likely that interests change from what is stated during applications, but at the same time, having a very homogenous class may lead to student competition for rotation/lab spots in the future. Additionally, having a more diverse set of backgrounds seems naturally more intellectually stimulating. For more common fields like cancer biology, I assume that programs are OK with multiple students, but for more niche interests, like neural prosthetics/neural engineering or motor neuroscience, is this the same? I would love it if anyone involved with admissions could comment on whether "class research interests" is an aspect that schools actively try to shape.
It seems difficult because it is very likely that interests change from what is stated during applications, but at the same time, having a very homogenous class may lead to student competition for rotation/lab spots in the future. Additionally, having a more diverse set of backgrounds seems naturally more intellectually stimulating. For more common fields like cancer biology, I assume that programs are OK with multiple students, but for more niche interests, like neural prosthetics/neural engineering or motor neuroscience, is this the same? I would love it if anyone involved with admissions could comment on whether "class research interests" is an aspect that schools actively try to shape.
Last edited: