- Joined
- May 19, 2003
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
I have done a lot of research over the past few weeks on this whole process. As I plan on sending in my AMCAS by Monday, I want to be sure to place the 'right' schools on my list.
Reading through this forum, I have noticed a particular trend. It seems as if most of the 'seasoned' posters discuss mainly those schools in the top 25 (US News and World Report Rankings). I an older applicant (even at 25), and my scores are not the most competitive for MSTP. Although I (and my professors and my PIs) have no doubts in my ability to perform at this level, I realize that the applicants with higher scores (all else being equal) will probably always win a spot before I do (at the top schools).
I have realized (for myself at least) that the main factor in choosing schools should not necessarily be the med school rankings, but actually the specific PhD programs that I want to follow. In the end, I will have an MD/PhD, which will provide me more opportunities and the training that I need. If I perform well on boards, I don't think that attending a school below the top 30 range will inhibit my final goals. My goal is not to be the head of a department someday. I want to provide care to a population of patients from which I will draw questions about their disease process and use basic science to seek answers. Is the problem that I will not be deemed competitive for grants when I graduate from a lower ranked school, even if I prove myself through boards, etc.?
I want those forum members who attend or applied to MD-PhD programs with 'lower rankings' to come forward and just say where they are. I doubt that everyone on this forum only applied to and attend the top 20, but please correct me if I am wrong. Applying to 15+ schools doesn't necessarily imply a broad range. When those who suggest applying to 15+ schools, mean to dip below the top 20?
By the way, yesterday I had an excellent conversation with a MD/PhD program coordinator from a school in the ~40 rank range. With my 32 MCAT, she said that I would certainly prove competitive. This was comforting, although I have also observed that most coordinators always make you feel good about your potential.
Thanks for your comments in advance.
Reading through this forum, I have noticed a particular trend. It seems as if most of the 'seasoned' posters discuss mainly those schools in the top 25 (US News and World Report Rankings). I an older applicant (even at 25), and my scores are not the most competitive for MSTP. Although I (and my professors and my PIs) have no doubts in my ability to perform at this level, I realize that the applicants with higher scores (all else being equal) will probably always win a spot before I do (at the top schools).
I have realized (for myself at least) that the main factor in choosing schools should not necessarily be the med school rankings, but actually the specific PhD programs that I want to follow. In the end, I will have an MD/PhD, which will provide me more opportunities and the training that I need. If I perform well on boards, I don't think that attending a school below the top 30 range will inhibit my final goals. My goal is not to be the head of a department someday. I want to provide care to a population of patients from which I will draw questions about their disease process and use basic science to seek answers. Is the problem that I will not be deemed competitive for grants when I graduate from a lower ranked school, even if I prove myself through boards, etc.?
I want those forum members who attend or applied to MD-PhD programs with 'lower rankings' to come forward and just say where they are. I doubt that everyone on this forum only applied to and attend the top 20, but please correct me if I am wrong. Applying to 15+ schools doesn't necessarily imply a broad range. When those who suggest applying to 15+ schools, mean to dip below the top 20?
By the way, yesterday I had an excellent conversation with a MD/PhD program coordinator from a school in the ~40 rank range. With my 32 MCAT, she said that I would certainly prove competitive. This was comforting, although I have also observed that most coordinators always make you feel good about your potential.
Thanks for your comments in advance.