Ok, hijacking this thread now for one post, but you started it, so whine away if you dont like it.
What if "it" responds to a post directly in a thread? Is that a troll? Is that why you don't respond directly, but sit on the sidelines, taking a quote out of context that was directly related to something Prowler said about ME? I guess if the only way to not be a "troll" ("oh no! not that! my world will now collapse because some ****** on a forum called me a troll") is to quote out of context and not either directly respond or STFU, then guilty as charged. That would make me a troll.
Maybe we should define "troll:" 1) It can be a person who posts to inflame and incite.... OR 2) a person who is addicted to a forum (as in "trolling" the forums).
I'd say with the latter definition, your 1k posts and prowler's 4.7K posts definitely have me beat in the troll dept. In fact, I don't see how anyone could even have 4.7 posts here. Over, say, 5 years thats what? About 3 posts per day? Sorry, but that's sadly pathetic.
I wouldn't even be surprised if you're actually prowler with a different login to keep the number of total posts from 5700 (adding in your extra 1k) down to only 4700, and appear to give him/you some type of validity for those double-team agreements. Well done. You rock and are oh-so-non-trollish now in my book. And that matters. No really, it does.