Actually, I was slightly incorrect (I just checked). It's $15 million/yr for two years, with an option on the third year (which likely means he'll get an additional bonus if he stays).
Why does this piss you- the self-avowed libertarian- off, when this is the price that the free market has determined for his salary?
I'm not against it in that I don't think he should get the money or that I think it's inherently wrong. Someone (perhaps enough people) believe that he has enough value to garner such a salary. But, I do think that it is disgusting the amount of value we place on celebrity in our culture, and that this money is far beyond what anyone should get in comparison to what he gives back to society. That's just my opinion, though, and others may disagree with that.
Look, that $15M/yr has to come from somewhere. That means higher ticket prices, higher dollar amounts on advertising paid by companies, and higher prices for me at the grocery store (etc.).
What that
doesn't mean, to me, is that the government should step in and regulate how much he gets, or tax him higher because of it. Just because I have a Civil Libertarian leaning doesn't mean that I
can't scoff at the absurd excesses and what I perceive to be the misappropriation of resources to individuals who don't provide a substantial benefit to society. I ultimately have to pay for this, too, in an indirect sort of way. Civil Libertarianism does not, contrary to misperception on this forum, mean "every man for himself" and "screw society - I'm in it for me". It just means that government doesn't have all the answers to society's ills, and that it should step out of things it has a woeful track record of spending billions on with little to no results. Don't confuse this with what I perceive to be an outrageous salary given to an a**hole.
I do have a say, though. My option is to not watch those games, not go to the ballpark, and not buy the products he endorses. But, I realize that alone it's just a fart in a windstorm.
-copro