-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
MOCA 2.0 survey
Started by urge
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Done. Agree completely on practice improvement being a waste of time. Makes me feel like I'm back in high school or college.
Just told them what I really think... it's funny that the survey is not about weather the practice improvement part is needed or not, it's just about what should be included and how to document it!
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
i was going to send them a photo of my anus in close up however i knew it was tracked and they would know it was meJust told them what I really think... it's funny that the survey is not about weather the practice improvement part is needed or not, it's just about what should be included and how to document it!
Agreed. Reiterated multiple times what a waste of time it is and that we don't need more busy work. Hopefully they'll listen...
I unloaded both barrels. I'd repeat the simulation before I do any of this garbage.
Maybe they can document completion with a photo of your anus? I should have added that. 🙁
Done. I was going to post my survey response in full, but thought better of it. As others have mentioned, I let them know my true feelings about it instead of answering their questions.
I let them have it. There is no evidence for any benefit of PPAI. It is completely devoid of value.
This just came out online-http://anesthesiologynews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=Commentary&d_id=449&i=June+2015&i_id=1194&a_id=32592
This just came out online-http://anesthesiologynews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=Commentary&d_id=449&i=June+2015&i_id=1194&a_id=32592
That was the gist of my response too.I let them have it. There is no evidence for any benefit of PPAI. It is completely devoid of value.
I already did the PI project during the 1st half of my MOCA period, but I won't ever do another. I'll finish out this cycle of MOCA whatever they come up with (too early in my career to completely burn that bridge), but after that if it's not simple, cheap, and useful, I'm done with the ABA.
Right, they're still hoping that by offering "so what flavor of MOCA would you like?" that they'll somehow get to a point where they can see the membership asked for what they're giving.
If they make the alternative to the sim painful enough, everyone will want the sim. Which I thought was actually fine.
The simulator is too expensive. Plus you have to miss a day or two from work sometimes. And to top it off you only get to do 4 cases. The benefit is minimal.If they make the alternative to the sim painful enough, everyone will want the sim. Which I thought was actually fine.
I don't think there is any good reason for any practicing anesthesiologist to do any performance improvement project. Is the ABA going to teach me that I have been taping the tube wrong for the past 10 yrs? Maybe the IV? Giving zofran at the beginning rather than the end ( or vice versa)?
You should just be exposed to practice changing literature and revised guidelines. That's it.
Last edited: