- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
PathOne said:As anyone will say, it hugely depends on a large number of variables: Location, lab setting, partnership status, referrals etc. etc.
However, generally speaking, a dermpath can expect to make more than a dermatologist, and often quite a lot more than a pathologist. Why? One reason is that an experienced dermpath can diagnose a case rather quickly. Obviously, there's the hard and time-consuming cases, but most are fairly straight forward. That means more billing (or more human working hours, depending on preference).
Specific numbers? 300K/year shouldn't be unattainable, and insurance, like in derm and path, is not a huge issue. Top? Well, Bernie Ackerman earlier this year gave 10 mil. to Harvard, so........
LADoc00 said:That said I have seen (personally) starting offers in dermpath of between 500K-1million dollars, Im not BSing. Yes, for me life is not so good.
😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡 😡
Yea.phillystudent said:holy crap....I guess I could live on that.
Fermata said:Yea.
I suppose that you'd have to pull back your lifestyle a bit. 😀
Hudson said:I knew a mohs surgeon who had a factory going. 2 PA's(did most of his suturing), 3 nurses full-time, 2 medical assistants full-time. He also had his own lab with 3 cryo machines and two laba ssistants preparing slides full-time. He read all his own slides and probably knocked out 8-15 cases/day (multiple cases going on at once). He also did a ton of cyro/laser/x-ray tx as well. He worked Mon-F with one 1/2 day/wk and a few Fri's/mo off, no weekends, no call. Normal day was 10 hrs. He was easily making 1-1.5+ mil/yr. There is a TON of $$$ in derm if you are willing to work for it.
wooo said:dermies can read their own slides w/o a dermpath fellow. Thet usually read the BCC's, AK's, SK's, KA's, and SCC's and sent the tricky stuff such as melanocytic things to dermpaths
A recently published study indicates that only 6% of most dermatologists' time was spent on doing cosmetic procedues, a level that has stayed the same over the past few years even though overall compensation has increased since 2002.Income gains have been significant through MOHS and non cosmetic surgical procedures which are receiving much more focus in derm residencies.The supply of dermatologists is so limited relative to the population and numbers of other medical practitioners that the demand for specialists with this expertise is unlikely to drop in the near future. There are many higher paying specialties in medicine,the big advantage in Derm is that the time spent for the income earned and the overall quality of life is difficult to beat.novacek88 said:I think Derm salaries will significantly drop within the next decade. Family Practice physicians are now incorporating many dermatological procedures that were once practiced only by dermatologists and plastic surgerons. Laser resurfacing, hair removal, vein removal, microdermal abrasion, chemical peels, photo facials etc. can be practiced by non-dermatologists. For example, a lot of family practice physicians are performing botox. And while the general public would prefer a dermatologist perform these procedures, they realize they can save significant amounts of money by seeing an FP albeit with potential additional risk. Furthermore a lot of non-physicians and spas are doing simple things such as chemical peels, hair removal and microdermal abrasion. All of this will take income away from many dermatologists.
ny skindoc said:A recently published study indicates that only 6% of most dermatologists' time was spent on doing cosmetic procedues.
vinisew said:Just curious what is the difference between a dermpath and a derm? 😕
donvicious said:I believe dermpaths must complete a path residency then do a derm fellowship.
A dermatopathologist is a specialist in the pathology of the skin.They read path slides of skin biopsies.It is a subspecialty of pathology although many programs are run by dermatology depts and requires a fellowship following a path residency. It is also possible to enter this fellowship after derm residency.In the past that was the usual route but now most dermpath fellows are pathologists.It is highly lucrative and in big demand.vinisew said:ok i understand that, but what are the differences in what they do? this is my first time hearing about a dermpath.