More problems at university of Colorado

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

omaralt

Senior Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
May 31, 2004
Messages
687
Reaction score
13
http://www.drbicuspid.com/mobile.aspx?Sec=mobile&Sub=1&ItemID=304671

Colo. dental school faces racism charges
May 18, 2010
By: Laird Harrison, Senior Editor

An African-American professor has charged the University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine with racism, the latest in a series of legal actions against the school.

In a notice of claim filed April 23, Morris Clark, B.D.S., D.D.S., accuses the university leadership and his colleagues of paying him a reduced salary, delaying promotions, socially ostracizing him, and making bigoted remarks to him because of his race. The 65-page notice reaches back to the day Dr. Clark arrived for his first interview before being hired in 1981, and alleges a pattern of discrimination continuing up to the present.

"As a result of the University of Colorado School of Dental Medicine's mistreatment of him, Dr. Clark has sustained a substantial loss of income and other harm, both economic and noneconomic," writes his attorney Diane King of Denver in the notice of claim, the preliminary step before filing a formal lawsuit.

Among Dr. Clark's allegations:

* Pay discrimination: Dr. Clark earns a salary of $110,000 per year, while some of his colleagues get nearly twice as much, and one of Dr. Clark's students was hired three years ago, immediately after graduation, at a salary of $150,000, according to the notice. Similarly, it says, Dr. Clark receives smaller stipends than other faculty for taking on additional duties.

* Promotion discrimination: Dr. Clark only received tenure after 15 years at the University, more than double the typical seven years, the notice says.

* A broader pattern: The school has shown general discrimination by hiring very few other African-American faculty members and admitting very few African-American students, the notice charges.

In addition to racial discrimination, the notice charges that Dr. Clark's First Amendment and whistleblower rights were violated because he was harassed for speaking out about discrimination against students. He is seeking both compensation and punitive damages.

DrBicuspid.com tried unsuccessfully to reach several of the people named in the document, but some of these individuals issued statements. "We take these allegations very seriously," said spokesperson Jacque Montgomery in an e-mail. "Dr. Clark has worked at the School of Dental Medicine for nearly 30 years. The appropriate places to report concerns of racial discrimination are to the Office of Human Resources or to the Employment Rights Compliance and Investigation Officer. Neither office has a report from Dr. Clark during his time here. We are investigating his allegations."

In a written statement, Don Kleier, D.M.D., chair of the department of surgical dentistry, suggested that Dr. Clark should have brought up his complaints sooner. "Never, during the 20 years or so of our professional relationship, did Dr. Clark complain to me about my conduct or about his work environment," he said. "Never, to my knowledge, did he avail himself of the available administrative mechanisms to address his allegations."

Denise Kassebaum, D.D.S., M.S., dean of the dental school, said the university's investigation into the claims has been delayed by an injury to Dr. Clark. She doesn't address the accusations of personal discrimination in the written statement she issued, but she defends her record in hiring women and minorities and in recruiting a more diverse student body. "This year's entering dental class at the University of Colorado is the most diverse we have ever enrolled, and we are proud to be above the national average relative to diversity of our entering class," she wrote.

The legal notice is the latest in a series of widely publicized complaints against the school. Earlier this year, patients' filed notice of potential suits against the school for allegedly permitting faculty with lapsed licenses to practice dentistry.

Copyright © 2010 DrBicuspid.com
omaralt is online now Report Post Edit/Delete Message
 
Last edited:
Hmmmmmm. Work at a dental school for 30 years and then sue for race discrimination? Seems fishy. Why did it take so long to bring suit? Looks like someone is looking for a payday.
 
hmmmmmm. Work at a dental school for 30 years and then sue for race discrimination? Seems fishy. Why did it take so long to bring suit? Looks like someone is looking for a payday.

+1000000
 
Hmmmmmm. Work at a dental school for 30 years and then sue for race discrimination? Seems fishy. Why did it take so long to bring suit? Looks like someone is looking for a payday.

lol probably after seeing one of his former students start out at $150K and he's still making $110K after 30 yrs, he got a little pissed. cant say i blame him
 
This case is actually very interesting. Dr. Clark, from my experience, is a good teacher and a very genuine person. He is also very wealthy, so it is a little hard for me to imagine that he is just grabbing for money. Maybe he just finally had enough, or maybe he thought 20 years ago that nothing would happen or worse, he might find himself looking for another job, if he spoke out.

On the flip side, I have heard that he is not board certified and thus cannot be paid as much. Also, the idea for a Dean of Diversity or something like that was probably his idea, but the deanship ended up being given to a different African-American professor. Don't know these things for certain, though.

Anyway, here is a link to the actual notice of claim for you to read and decide for yourselves.

https://docs.google.com/fileview?id...TYtMGQzNS00MzZlLThmM2QtMmI2MDRmMDVkNGY2&hl=en

This is a public document, btw.
 
rumors of discrimination may be true. lots of minority faculty ,staff are unhappy due to culture of selective promotions/ Students it is a hell
 
Last edited:
What other problems are there at the school?
 
The google
I really dislike the author's one sided slant. Although this is an old post, no one bothered to right the misconception posted by the OP or even question it. It's hard to swallow that conditions were so horrible that Clark worked there for 29 years. Clark is a freedom fighter on behalf of minority staff AND students. CU is investigated by DEA. It looks like a battle bet a prof and the dean who he deeply resents. He resents not being invited to a Christmas party. He resents having Obama called his "boy". I see a lot of boo hoos. After 29 years, there were prob a lot of Deans at CU. One was from USC, which is a pretty diversified school. They were all racist? It's pretty hard to do these things in the open in a large public institution nowadays compared to, say, the 60s. I question the OP for posting a journalistic article from bicupsid.com. Why not dingdongdentist.com while he's at it? This article from the local newspaper paints a more informative article: http://www.denverpost.com/boulder/ci_15074198

A follow-up by any fellow SDNer would show this:
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_15425538

"For example, Clark asserted that he wasn't granted tenure until he had been at the school 15 years. However, Temple concluded that Clark was granted tenure in 1985 — four years after he was hired

Temple also said Clark underestimated his salary by $25,000, listing it at $110,000 when it was actually $135,198.

Other professors are paid more because of market forces — not discrimination — Temple wrote. Dr. Michael Savage, for example, is board-certified and consistently earns strong evaluations. After he received a written job offer that would have included a $200,000 raise, the university agreed to pay him an extra $100,000 a year to keep him.

The bottom line, Temple wrote, is that dental school salaries are "uniformly based on unbiased merit evaluations. Dr. Clark's evaluations have been lower than his colleagues' . . . and this has resulted in a lower salary."

Temple also wrote that numerous faculty members had termed Clark "unreliable" and "chronically tardy."


He "underestimated" his salary. More like lied about his salary. It seems he conveniently leaves out a lot of unimportant things, like tardiness and not board certified, but includes many important things like being snubbed at a Christmas party invitation. It's people like Clark who over use the race card that ruins it for people who have genuine allegations and charges.
 
Last edited:
Top