More Useless Regulation...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

interleukin2

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
More BS...I wonder what agency will collect the obligatory "course fee for this BS"

Administration Wants to Tighter Painkiller Rules
NYT

By BARRY MEIER and ABBY GOODNOUGH


The Obama administration said Tuesday that it would seek legislation requiring doctors to undergo mandatory training before being permitted to prescribe powerful painkillers like OxyContin, marking the most aggressive step taken by federal officials to control both the use and abuse of the drugs.
In the last decade, the abuse of pain medications like OxyContin has remained at epidemic levels, as medical experts have expressed concern that the legitimate use of the drugs may also pose patient risks. For years, the question of whether doctors should be trained as a condition of prescribing such medications has been fiercely debated.
Proponents of the training argue that it would not only help doctors better identify patients who would benefit from treatment with long-acting narcotics, but would help them discover patients feigning pain to get drugs they then abuse. Opponents say that such a training requirement will reduce the number of doctors prescribing pain drugs and harm patient care.
Such a measure would likely entail Congressional approval of an amendment to the Controlled Substances Act to require that doctors undergo training as a condition of the renewal of licenses issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration for the prescription of narcotics. The law now gives the D.E.A. the authority to approve prescription licenses if a doctor merely shows an active license to practice medicine. Federal officials announced the legislative initiative on Tuesday along with outlining other measures they hope will reduce prescription drug abuse.
“The White House is absolutely committed to legislation that will make prescriber education mandatory,” R. Gil Kerlikowske, President Obama’s top drug policy adviser, said in an interview Tuesday. “Of all the things we’re proposing, this is certainly the one that’s got a real bright light behind it.”
Mr. Kerlikowske said his office had already approached several lawmakers about the legislation and intended to help craft it. He acknowledged that it was unclear when a bill would be submitted but said he hoped supporters in Congress would do so by year’s end.
Any proposal is likely to be fought by drug makers, some doctors and patients groups who have argued that any doctor training should be voluntary, not mandatory. In addition, proposed legislation would likely encounter opposition among some lawmakers who have already mounted campaigns against what they consider the over-regulation of the health care industry.
Among the drugs that would most probably fall under a stricter licensing measure are as OxyContin, fentanyl and methadone. They are considered critical to pain treatment. But they also have been associated in recent years with a national epidemic of prescription drug abuse and addiction, as well as thousands of overdose-related deaths. OxyContin is the brand name for a long-acting form of the drug oxycodone.
The administration’s move follows the overwhelming rejection last year by a panel of experts assembled by the Food and Drug Administration to review its proposal that physician training be voluntary. Those experts argued that mandatory training was needed.
The F.D.A. has long argued that only Congress has the authority to mandate physician training as a condition of prescribing narcotics, because the legal distribution of the drugs is regulated by the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 and the licensing of doctors to prescribe them is overseen by the D.E.A., not the F.D.A.
In a related development, the F.D.A. released new regulations Tuesday that would require manufacturers of long-acting or extended release painkillers to provide training to doctors but not require doctors to take such courses, similar to the one rejected as too weak in last year’s debate. Dr. Janet Woodcock, who heads the F.D.A.’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, indicated that the new agency rules were effectively a placeholder until legislation is passed or to be used if a relevant bill failed.
In response to a reporter’s question, she said that officials of the F.D.A., the D.E.A. and other federal agencies agreed on the requirement for mandatory training. Mr. Kerlikowske, the White House drug czar, said he had sought input from doctors, medical schools and representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, which he said would pay for the training. The training would focus on opioid painkillers like OxyContin because they were the most widely abused and dangerous class of drugs prescribed by doctors, he said.
“That’s where, right now, the impetus and the public concern is,” he said. “You don’t want to be accused of overreaching.”
About 600,000 doctors, dentists and physician assistants are licensed by the D.E.A. to prescribe controlled substances, according to Mr. Kerlikowske’s office.
“They don’t get a lot of information in their training about pain management, about addiction, about tolerance and dependence,” he said.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/20/health/20painkiller.html?_r=1
 
why is it a problem? i would argue that most of the problems with poor opiate prescribing practices is lack of education. we get a unique perspective due to our specialty, but family docs are not required to get anything and they get the same DEA license I do. I have nothing wrong with this.
 
why is it a problem? i would argue that most of the problems with poor opiate prescribing practices is lack of education. we get a unique perspective due to our specialty, but family docs are not required to get anything and they get the same DEA license I do. I have nothing wrong with this.

I don't either. I'm not particularly excited to spend about 85% of my time on my IM rotation fighting with patients about narcotics, trying to figure out who is prescribing what, which pharmacies they go to for what, etc. If they made the drug database more accessible that would be a great start, but barring that, I'd even go so far as to say that only specialized providers write scripts for narcotics, or only specialized pharmacies dispense them. Something. It's so unregulated now it's ridiculous.
 
I'd argue most of the poor prescribing is not under education. It is the full on sell outs. $350,000 starting salary for FP/GP in a pill mill is the going rate.
Think about not having to see or examine patients. The "managers" do the history/records/UDS. Just sit in another room and sign the Rx's.

Is the money worth the risk- for some it is- and we are working on stomping out their licenses.
 
Why do I think this is going to end up meaning that we all have to go onto a slow-loading website every 2 years, click "next" on some slideshow 200 times, and then BS our way through a multiple choice test about "what is the 5th vital sign" and "does this patient have addiction or pseudoaddiction?"

Hopefully, thanks to tab-based browsing, I'll be able to do my online sexual harassment and information security training at the same time.
 
All I have to say about this is "Dilaudid is the only thing that works for me."

:laugh: Will the training help us treat that same patient's allergies to Toradol, Aspirin, Tylenol, Darvon, Codeine, Naprosyn, Ibuprofen, Codeine, Morphine, Meperidine, and Hydrocodone?
 
family docs are not required to get anything and they get the same DEA license I do.

Forget family doc's, how about "FP"-trained nurse practitioners? 😱

I do agree that the widespread prescribing of (and recreational use of, and abuse of, and illegal sale of) opioids is a problem, one that we as the prescribers are not gonna be very successful with on the DEMAND side. But we can certainly attack the SUPPLY side.
 
Haven't heard this one. Why would the IV push give them a high?

(For that matter, why does diphenhydramine IV push give anyone a high?)

it potentiates the demerol high when both are given together (which is how its usually requested)

both phenergan and diphenhydramine are antihistamines...the high for benadryl isnt really great, but large doses (or brief periods of high blood levels, such as after IV push) may give someone a euphoric feeling or a dysphoria masked as euphoria
 
Hopefully, thanks to tab-based browsing, I'll be able to do my online sexual harassment and information security training at the same time.

Hopefully this narcotic training won't be as hard as the sexual harassment training. I always fail that test. 😀
 
Yesterday I completed my mandatory online fire extinguisher training. No joke.

Mandatory. Online. Fire Extinguisher. Training. >.<
index.php
 
Mandatory. Online. Fire Extinguisher. Training. >.<

Complete with cool clip art:

fire.gif

fire2.gif



The things we do in the military ... :laugh:


As much as I gripe about this silly online training, in all honesty, it's preferable to the alternative: physically attending classroom training on the topic.

At some point, somebody, somewhere must've tried to douse an office fire with the clear liquid in the can marked 'gasoline' ... or maybe discharged an extinguisher on his cubicle-mate as a joke ... and now every soul in the Navy needs annual training on portable fire extinguishers.

I shudder to think what horrible incident prompted our annual 'human trafficking' training.
 
Why do I think this is going to end up meaning that we all have to go onto a slow-loading website every 2 years, click "next" on some slideshow 200 times, and then BS our way through a multiple choice test about "what is the 5th vital sign" and "does this patient have addiction or pseudoaddiction?"

Hopefully, thanks to tab-based browsing, I'll be able to do my online sexual harassment and information security training at the same time.

ROFL!

It's good to know this kind of mandated training gets the same level of attention in all professions 🙂
 
Top