I see your point and I can't fathom how a neo-Nazi murderer could have beat out 2200 other deserving applicants for one of 100 acceptances that the medical school gives out every year. The medical school there should do some serious soul searching.
The admittance of the convict was not done with foreknowledge of his criminal record, at least for the current med school he is in, because the school said they have tried to expel him but can't since they found no rules that says students, once admitted, can be expelled for their past criminal history.
Also, keep in mind that it was only recently that our med school application required people to admit to prior felony convictions (and recently, to misdemeanor offenses). I am not aware of a full background check that med schools do, although someone more involved in the admissions process may shed some light on that.
Also, was he convicted of first degree murder? 11 years with 6 years out for good behavior is more common for manslaughter or other less murder charges. Even in this country, we see that plenty of times, premeditated murder is different from killing in the heat of an argument, or incidental killing etc. The article never made clear the circumstances of his crime, only that he had neo-nazi sympathies and killed a person after which he seemed to turn over a new leaf and focus on his academic coursework.
I believe in rehabilitation of criminals, but I still think when a serious crime has been committed, we should not be so quick to put ex-convicts in positions of authority. Given enough time as a law abiding citizen, I can provide leeway for an excon to be a doctor or teacher (say, 15-20 years after good behavior), but if the crime is fairly recent, I believe they should try to focus on jobs that does not put them in such position of authority. That said, a justice system that stresses rehabilitation is probably a better system than a pure punitive one.