nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
and it has to do with a massive vascular injury during a hip revision.
 

nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
and me handing off the resuscitation 4 hours later. and me not placing a central line before the case. and the lateral position with no neck. and something dumb like 22 liters through the belmont.
 
About the Ads

Arch Guillotti

Senior Member
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
15+ Year Member
Aug 9, 2001
8,629
3,821
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
Well that is a nightmare. I can think of very few reasons to place central access during a hip case unless your access is absolutely terrible to begin with so nobody can fault you for that. I have done double redos a few times and haven't used any special access for them. WHat is concerning as well is possible conversion to GA. Did you start out w/ a spinal?
 

nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
holy cow. what kind of access did you have? maybe they should have called the trauma service for damage control.

vascular was in there pretty fast. in the end we used much more volume than was needed, but without central access we were limited to pushing epi and phenylephrine through those "two large-bore PIVs". his pressures just sucked unless the fluid rate was holding them up, though, even when they had relative control of the injury (it was hard because they didn't know what the injury WAS- it wasn't like they saw the artery and nicked it. they think the retractor "tore" something...). I think his heart sucked more than we knew and may have been infarcting. in retrospect, more pressors and less fluid but damn....
 

nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
Well that is a nightmare. I can think of very few reasons to place central access during a hip case unless your access is absolutely terrible to begin with so nobody can fault you for that. I have done double redos a few times and haven't used any special access for them. WHat is concerning as well is possible conversion to GA. Did you start out w/ a spinal?

thank god, no. we placed an epidural for POP but due to his size and the fact that the case was posted for like 6 hours we tubed him right off.
 

Planktonmd

Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
Nov 2, 2006
7,159
2,673
The South
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
The good news is that this type of complications only happens in academia and you almost never see it in private practice.
2 good peripheral IV's is a reasonable access for hip revision, and as Arch said, unless the patient had terrible veins I would not place a central line.
 

thegasman

15+ Year Member
Sep 29, 2003
354
1
southeast
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
The good news is that this type of complications only happens in academia and you almost never see it in private practice.
2 good peripheral IV's is a reasonable access for hip revision, and as Arch said, unless the patient had terrible veins I would not place a central line.

agree - I haven't placed any central lines in my 5 months or so of private practice. Hopefully I can find a case to put one in, but usually a 14 g or 16 g piv or two will do fine if I need some access. One of the senior partners has a line "every case is a one iv case until proven otherwise"
 

nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
according to the vascular note, they ended up repairing/bypassing the common femoral. :eek: he got a swan overnight and his heart is still sucking...
 

jetproppilot

Turboprop Driver
15+ Year Member
Mar 12, 2005
5,863
134
level at FL210
Status (Visible)
and me handing off the resuscitation 4 hours later. and me not placing a central line before the case. and the lateral position with no neck. and something dumb like 22 liters through the belmont.

Another example of academia providing "skewed reality" to a resident.

Dude, that s hit doesnt even come close to happening in private practice.

You said this was for a hip?

Twenty two liters?

I've seen better animal studies.:thumbdown:

The surgeon you've been given the "opportunity" to work with needs to consider psychiatry.
 

nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
Another example of academia providing "skewed reality" to a resident.

Dude, that s hit doesnt even come close to happening in private practice.

You said this was for a hip?

Twenty two liters?

I've seen better animal studies.:thumbdown:

The surgeon you've been given the "opportunity" to work with needs to consider psychiatry.
I said it was a hip where they shredded the common femoral with a retractor. and no, I don't think he had 22 liters of loss- it was hard to tell because only a fraction of it was going to the canister. he needed volume and got volume, then needed pressors and got volume. in retrospect.

private practice wouldn't do the case. sent him up to be a statistic on our books instead.
 

jetproppilot

Turboprop Driver
15+ Year Member
Mar 12, 2005
5,863
134
level at FL210
Status (Visible)
I said it was a hip where they shredded the common femoral with a retractor. and no, I don't think he had 22 liters of loss- it was hard to tell because only a fraction of it was going to the canister. he needed volume and got volume, then needed pressors and got volume. in retrospect.

private practice wouldn't do the case. sent him up to be a statistic on our books instead.

Thanks for proving my point.:thumbup:

More commonly in academics, my friend.

More commonly in academics.
 
Last edited:

Planktonmd

Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
Nov 2, 2006
7,159
2,673
The South
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
I said it was a hip where they shredded the common femoral with a retractor. and no, I don't think he had 22 liters of loss- it was hard to tell because only a fraction of it was going to the canister. he needed volume and got volume, then needed pressors and got volume. in retrospect.

private practice wouldn't do the case. sent him up to be a statistic on our books instead.[/quote]

Really!
A private practice surgeon refused to do a hip revision??
 

jetproppilot

Turboprop Driver
15+ Year Member
Mar 12, 2005
5,863
134
level at FL210
Status (Visible)
I said it was a hip where they shredded the common femoral with a retractor. and no, I don't think he had 22 liters of loss- it was hard to tell because only a fraction of it was going to the canister. he needed volume and got volume, then needed pressors and got volume. in retrospect.

private practice wouldn't do the case. sent him up to be a statistic on our books instead.[/quote]

Really!
A private practice surgeon refused to do a hip revision??

CONCUR.

We've gotta ROKKSTAR orthopedist who does revisions almost every operative day.

OH, AND BY THE WAY, I'VE NEVER SEEN HIM COMPROMISE A VESSEL WITH A RETRACTOR.:laugh:
 
Jun 20, 2005
8,013
2,795
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
Did they repair the common femoral artery or was it actually the femoral vein. I'd put my money on the vein. You don't tear an artery as easily as a vein. And I've seen it happen b/4. It ain't pretty.
 

nutmegs

7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 15, 2003
906
0
Status (Visible)
I don't doubt private practice ortho does revisions. I'm not sure what made this one especially difficult, just that it was discussed as being more technically challenging and posted for longer than our standard revisions.

The vascular note said artery, and they angio and repaired it. :unsure: The pressure went from 106/70 to 40/20 literally in the space of seconds, so...
 
Jun 20, 2005
8,013
2,795
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
I don't doubt private practice ortho does revisions. I'm not sure what made this one especially difficult, just that it was discussed as being more technically challenging and posted for longer than our standard revisions.

The vascular note said artery, and they angio and repaired it. :unsure: The pressure went from 106/70 to 40/20 literally in the space of seconds, so...

His insurance or lack there of.
 

KNC

10+ Year Member
Mar 25, 2008
121
1
The Burgh
Status (Visible)
  1. Other Health Professions Student
Damn!!! I am at a loss. I have done a number of trauma ortho cases and the surgeon never came close to hitting a femoral artery in the lateral position. Even with a deep Charling Retractor, that is close to impossible. The surgeons incision must have been severely inferior. Most of that blood loss must have been in Lap sponges and on the floor since it wasn't in the suction canister. What was the surgeon doing, taking out half the sacrum as well?
 
Last edited:
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.