- Joined
- Jun 11, 2014
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 28
Last edited:
This; plus, initials save characters! 😉The other option is that you use an initial.
My story includes "M" and "T," trust me it is very hard to find out who the people are especially since one has been dead since like 2009 or something. If you do it vague enough it is almost impossible to violate HIPAA.
Is your friend famous? I can't think of any other reason it would make a difference to include the full/real name. Though if your friend is famous you may be sued....
I also have a followup question -- I mentioned a friend by name in one of my activity descriptions, but he is deceased and his death was not related to a disease. I didn't even consider the possibility that this might not be okay. Do you think I'm in the clear? I'm quite sure that his parents would be fine with me talking about him.
If you did something because you were inspired by the death of your friend ___ who died in a biking accident or something like that, you are in the clear.
Also, HIPAA is not violated if you acquired information outside of the setting of a medical/insurance setting (e.g. your friend shared information about their own health with you). However, your friend might have assumed that you would keep this information confidential and not blab it to everyone who might read your application. The Declaration of Geneva that some med students pledge as they enter the profession makes mention of keeping confidential that which is learned in confidence. Embrace that ethos.
http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/g1/
Yes, that is exactly the kind of situation I'm talking about. Thanks for your reassurance! 🙂
Never use a real name in anything that approaches clinically helping someone, no matter the relationship, no matter your position, no matter what.
You have a variety of members in an adcom who are mostly in academia and therefore are more likely to espouse and adhere to higher standards such as ethics and HIPPA, You do not want to inadvertently raise a question in someone's mind that might wonder about your ethical standards. Use first name or better yet initials.
You also should not name drop in a PS, even it is a famous person unless you have a substantial pattern of impact, relationship, etc from that person. It can be perceived as simply name dropping and nothing more. If you did work under a famous researcher or were influenced directly/personally by someone with a names, it should be noted in EC and/or most meaningful experience and then simply referenced in the PS under the assumption that the reader already saw your EC or most meaningful.
What you want to avoid is anything that might leave a "bad taste" in a reader's mind about your intentions. Most Personal Statements are evaluated on "gut reaction". That is how did the reader feel after reading it. Was he or she moved, impressed, liking you, seeing your compassion, or did it raise questions about your true nature or intentions
But if it was a student, not a patient, and had nothing to do with clinically helping them and just my relationship with an emotionally extreme student is that ok? Thanks for responding.
And this is why they get very little respect throughout this process.Ok thanks so much for the quick replies, I'll do exactly that. My premed advisor did say that he thought it was ok though...
I included my friend's name because I helped him recover from depression.
Should I just use the first name or change his name and say something like "to whom I shall refer to as ___"?