Navy Residency Selection Board Results (DUINS)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

eric275

Prosthodontist
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Messages
623
Reaction score
6
Here are the results for the Navy DUINS board - class starting 2013. Congrats All!

SELECTEES FOR TRAINING IN THE
ADVANCED CLINICAL PROGRAM IN EXODONTIA
Seven (7) applications for advanced training in Exodontia were reviewed. The following four (4) applicants are recommended for selection with two (2) alternates:
1. Cervenka, Peter D. LT
2. Estrada, Kristen M. LT
3. Flannery, Michael B. LCDR
4. Sessa, Angela C. LCDR
Alternates:
1. Ward, Nicole G. LCDR
2. Williams, Andre L. LT

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
COMPREHENSIVE DENTISTRY
Thirteen (13) applications for residency training in Comprehensive Dentistry were reviewed. The following five (5) applicants are recommended for selection:
1. Ellis, Heidi S. LCDR
2. Eriksson, Kurt A. ENS
3. Hamlin, Nicholas J. LT
4. Hanson, Christopher M. LT
5. Knofczynski, Andrew R. ENS

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
ENDODONTICS
Fourteen (14) applications for residency training in Endodontics were reviewed. The following four (4) applicants are recommended for selection with four (4) alternates:
1. Boonsirisermsook, Kittima LT
2. Carroll, Thomas P. CDR
3. Rasmussen, Allen D. LT
4. Rumford IV, Frederick J. LT
Alternates:
1. Rancourt, Monica L. LT
2. Hicks, Jason L. LT
3. Hwang, David D. LT
4. Dow II, David M. LT

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
OPERATIVE AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY
Seven (7) applications for residency training in Operative and Preventive Dentistry were reviewed. The following two (2) applicants are recommended for selection with two (2) alternates:
1. Secrest, Joshua L. LT
2. Wade, Stephen M. LT
Alternates:
1. Rouse, Matthew A. LT
2. Adam, Shawna L. LT

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY
Six (6) applications for residency training in Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology were reviewed. The following three (3) applicants are recommended for selection:
1. Gray, Benjamin M. LCDR
2. Pakchoian, Andrew J. LT
3. Russell, Paul M. LT

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Eighteen (18) applications for residency training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery were reviewed. The following nine (9) applicants are recommended for selection with two (2) alternates:
1. Archer, Benjamin P. ENS
2. Brown-Blake, Cecilia M. LCDR
3. Green, David L. LT
4. Hammer, Daniel A. LT
5. Jing, Shuaiwen ENS
6. Pryor, Ryan J LT
7. Reardon, Joseph N. LT
8. Sviatocha, Valentine LT
9. Upton, John LT
Alternates:
1. Maliken, Christopher G. ENS
2. Orr, Justin C. LT

SELECTEE FOR FELLOWSHIP IN
CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
One (1) application for Fellowship in Craniofacial Surgery was reviewed. The following applicant is recommended for selection:
1. Gentile, Michael A. LCDR

SELECTEE FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
OROFACIAL PAIN
Two (2) applications for residency training in Orofacial Pain were reviewed. The following applicant is recommended for selection:
1. Vick, James K. LT

SELECTEE FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
ORTHODONTICS
Twelve (12) applications for residency training in Orthodontics were reviewed. The following one (1) applicant is recommended for selection with two (2) alternates:
1. Timmons, Phillip S. LCDR
Alternates:
1. Burns, Casey J. LCDR
2. Williams, Seth T. LT

SELECTEE FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
Eight (8) applications for residency training in Pediatric Dentistry were reviewed. The following one (1) applicant is recommended for selection with two (2) alternates.
1. Teutsch, Shawn D. LT
Alternates:
1. Perry, Melanie A. LT
2. Fuhrmann, Daniel J. LT

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
PERIODONTICS
Seven (7) applications for residency training in Periodontics were reviewed. The following four (4) applicants are recommended for selection:
1. Barth, Christopher T. ENS
2. Beck, Jared C. LT
3. Quintero, David G. LT
4. Thompson, Roger S. CDR

SELECTEES FOR RESIDENCY TRAINING IN
PROSTHODONTICS
Ten (10) applications for residency training in Prosthodontics were reviewed. The following four (4) applicants are recommended for selection with three (3) alternates:
1. Lish, James C. LT
2. Lores, Gustavo E. LT
3. Rasmussen, Bryan P. LCDR
4. Treesh, Joshua C. LCDR
Alternates:
1. Yang, Michael K. ENS
2. DeFazio, Michael C. ENS
3. Clark, Jeffrey M. ENS

Members don't see this ad.
 
As in the past people are always asking what percentage of applicants get accepted to residencies, or what are my chances of getting "X" residency right out of school.

With these board results, if you read the sentence above the list of names that were accepted you will see how many total applicants applied and how many were accepted for this cycle. Typically anyone listed as an ENS is coming in right out of d-school.

Some factors that influence the number of people accepted into a training program are:

What is the current or projected manning strength of the specialty - by projected I am referring to considerations to the overall numbers in light of request to get out.

Some residencies alternate between accepting 3 residents one year, followed by 4 residents the next year.

Also if a resident quits or is dropped, the specialty leader can ask for an additional resident the following year to make up for the one lost.

The number of residents applying in that cycle - sometimes there may not be enough residents applying to fill all available slots
 
Great ınfo! Seems lıke most out of dental school are OMFS.

Is thıs ınfo publıc for all Navy dental offıcers or are you ın some kınd of specıal posıtıon where you're able to vıew such thıngs?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
This information is sent out to all Navy dental officers in the WDU (Weekly Dental Update)
 
Great ınfo! Seems lıke most out of dental school are OMFS.

Is thıs ınfo publıc for all Navy dental offıcers or are you ın some kınd of specıal posıtıon where you're able to vıew such thıngs?

am I tripping or are all your "i"s missing the dot? looks like students have a good shot of going into comp and prosth as well. are these all 4 year OMFS slots?
 
Does anyone have this information for last year (2012)? The relevant WDU has a dead link (like all the other links in the WDUs).
 
am I tripping or are all your "i"s missing the dot? looks like students have a good shot of going into comp and prosth as well. are these all 4 year OMFS slots?

You are not trıppıng, I'm stuck ın a roastıng hot ınternet cafe ın Istanbul, the keyboard ıs to blame for the weırd letters. ;)

All Navy OMFS are 4 year, sınce thıs ıs for Navy Resıdency only (I assume).
 
Del Sol, thanks for the info. What rank is OCC? 2 students got selected to OMFS through NADDS, what is NADDS? thanks!
 
OCC is Officer Candidate Chief (E-7) and OC1 is Officer Candidate First Class (E-6). They are Navy HSCP students. NADDS is the Navy Active Duty Delayed for Specialist Program. It allows a few graduating seniors to defer their active duty commitment to attend a civilian residency.
 
for NADDS you are not on the military pay roll for your residency. However, when you finish, you only owe the years back from your HPSP. Not a bad gig at all. Also NADDS is only available for applicants who are in their 3rd year of dental school. There are no NADDS for active duty.
 
for NADDS you are not on the military pay roll for your residency. However, when you finish, you only owe the years back from your HPSP. Not a bad gig at all. Also NADDS is only available for applicants who are in their 3rd year of dental school. There are no NADDS for active duty.
I believe residency via Navy DUINS counts toward the years as a reserve officer, it does not increase the number of payback year. Am i right?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
there are 2 types of residencies 1. In service (does not incur payback) 2. out serive (does incur payback)
Both count years as officer
 
there are 2 types of residencies 1. In service (does not incur payback) 2. out serive (does incur payback)
Both count years as officer

That's not completely true.

In-service does incur payback (depending on the residency), however, dental school obligations can be paid back while in residency; therefore, the payback is concurrent.
Out-service also incurs payback (also depending on the residency), however, dental school obligations CANNOT be paid back while in residency; therefore, the payback is consecutive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
yep ur right
concurrent = time spend in residency counts for HPSP payback
consecutive = time spend in residency does not count for payback, therefore, total number of payback years is HPSP + years in residency
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
yep ur right
concurrent = time spend in residency counts for HPSP payback
consecutive = time spend in residency does not count for payback, therefore, total number of payback years is HPSP + years in residency

That is not correct. The time spent in residency does not count as payback.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
That is not correct. The time spent in residency does not count as payback.

No, that actually is correct. For example, if you are selected for in-service OMFS right after dental school and was on HPSP, your HPSP obligation would be "paid back" during your four years in residency. You would then owe four more years after the OMFS residency as "pay back" for the residency. You can apply the same scenario to any specialty with its respective ADSO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
No, that actually is correct. For example, if you are selected for in-service OMFS right after dental school and was on HPSP, your HPSP obligation would be "paid back" during your four years in residency. You would then owe four more years after the OMFS residency as "pay back" for the residency. You can apply the same scenario to any specialty with its respective ADSO.

That's technically not correct.

ADSO cannot be discharged during the residency itself. What happens is that any previous ADSO payback is put on hold while in residency, and then served following completion of residency.

Meanwhile, during residency, additional ADSO is incurred (half a year for each half year of training, or 1.5 years for each year of ortho or endo training). The way it is set up, if that training is done in-service, the payback on the ADSO for residency training is paid back concurrently with the remaining previous ADSO. For outservice training, the payback for the ADSO must be consecutive meaning that one ADSO must be fully discharged before the payback on the other ADSO can be started.

In most cases the distinction is not important - however it should be noted that if someone were to complete half a year or a year of residency and then drop out, they can be held to additional ADSO based on how much training they received, and that payback would not be concurrently paid back in the case of outservice training.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
That's technically not correct.

ADSO cannot be discharged during the residency itself. What happens is that any previous ADSO payback is put on hold while in residency, and then served following completion of residency.

Meanwhile, during residency, additional ADSO is incurred (half a year for each half year of training, or 1.5 years for each year of ortho or endo training). The way it is set up, if that training is done in-service, the payback on the ADSO for residency training is paid back concurrently with the remaining previous ADSO. For outservice training, the payback for the ADSO must be consecutive meaning that one ADSO must be fully discharged before the payback on the other ADSO can be started.

In most cases the distinction is not important - however it should be noted that if someone were to complete half a year or a year of residency and then drop out, they can be held to additional ADSO based on how much training they received, and that payback would not be concurrently paid back in the case of outservice training.

True but talk about splitting hairs. I assumed we were talking about scenarios where the individual actually completes the residency. Maybe all future posts relating to ADSO and specialty training should now include such a disclaimer.:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
It may not make a difference in the majority of cases; however, understanding the technicalities behind it can prevent problems later on. I'd say it's better to start with the correct understanding of the system than to base all your assumptions and plans on a flawed set of premises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
It may not make a difference in the majority of cases; however, understanding the technicalities behind it can prevent problems later on. I'd say it's better to start with the correct understanding of the system than to base all your assumptions and plans on a flawed set of premises.

Flawed set of premises? Really? What I said was correct even if it wasn't comprehensive. What did I say that was inaccurate?
 
That is not correct. The time spent in residency does not count as payback.

Using your logic, an answer like this is also incomplete and causes individuals to make "assumptions and plans" based on "a flawed set of premises." In fact, I would argue that by itself it is more misleading than my leaving out fine-print, technicalities. Come on man, we're trying to clarify things here so people can figure out if the Navy is the right fit for them.
 
That's fair enough - that said, it's important for some to know. An increasing number of new accessions are being sent straight into outservice residencies out of school - and there has always been attrition in the DUINS programs. It's important for those applicants to know that, if they get selected to outservice and end up quitting partway through, that they'll owe their original ADSO as well as any ADSO incurred from the DUINS program, so they really want to make sure that that's really what they want to be doing. The attrition rates in some of the specialty programs are a large contributor to the critically short manning levels in several of the specialty fields.
 
That's fair enough - that said, it's important for some to know. An increasing number of new accessions are being sent straight into outservice residencies out of school - and there has always been attrition in the DUINS programs. It's important for those applicants to know that, if they get selected to outservice and end up quitting partway through, that they'll owe their original ADSO as well as any ADSO incurred from the DUINS program, so they really want to make sure that that's really what they want to be doing. The attrition rates in some of the specialty programs are a large contributor to the critically short manning levels in several of the specialty fields.

Agreed and I am fully aware of that situation. Everything you just stated above was Chinese to me back when I was investigating the HPSP option for dental school. With my small brain, I have to simplify things. What people really want to know (I've found) is the bottomline when it comes to DUINS and ADSO. How many more years will I owe the Navy if...?

Let us now consider our schlongs equal in length.
 
If someone does NADDS, do those years spent in civilian residency count towards Years in Service, and thus count towards retirement? Also, let's say someone does a 4-year OMFS residency on NADDS - when they're done with that residency, do they only owe 4 years ADSO, right?

And, also:
for NADDS you are not on the military pay roll for your residency. However, when you finish, you only owe the years back from your HPSP. Not a bad gig at all. Also NADDS is only available for applicants who are in their 3rd year of dental school. There are no NADDS for active duty.
can people on HSCP be considered for NADDS as well even though they're technically "Active Duty"?
 
So a student that graduates dental school on the HPSP and gets accepted to an in-service OMFS program will still owe 4 years of service after the completion of the residency program?
 
Top