i dont purport to be better than private practices. if anything, i provide fewer of the expensive services that lead to high SOS. you dont get SOS for talking about CBT, EAET, mindfulness or home exercise or weight loss (this system does not charge facility fee for office visits.)
yes, private practices seeing medicaid is probably location dependent. overall, i would be pretty confident in thinking that majority do not see a large volume.
in my location, the private practices are very low on Medicaid.
at one point, 2 of these practices tried to open their own ASC. they claimed they needed the ASC because of their high volume of Medicare and Medicaid patients. the state shot them down because the numbers the state reviewed revealed that Medicaid made up 1% of their patient population and Medicare 7%.
a separate private practice also sees medicaid patients - at the rate of 1 a week. this was touted when i interviewed there, 12 years ago. i was told by the owner that i would never survive in the hospital practice i took over because of the medicaid volume
SOS arbitrage is a scam and working as an HOPD doc just to juice the vig on SOS for your employer has got to be the most unethical thing I can think of...especially when your bonus depends on it.
No one can depend on HOPD docs to fix this problem. They have competing commitments. Only the private sector can step up.
HEALTH AFFAIRSVOL. 40, NO. 5: CONSOLIDATION, PRIVATE EQUITY & MORE
CONSIDERING HEALTH SPENDING
Higher Medicare Spending On Imaging And Lab Services After Primary Care Physician Group Vertical Integration
Christopher M. Whaley, Xiaoxi Zhao, Michael Richards, and Cheryl L. Damberg
AFFILIATIONS
PUBLISHED:MAY 2021No Accesshttps://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01006
Abstract
In recent years direct ownership of physician practices by hospitals and health systems (that is, vertical integration) has become a prominent feature of the US health care system. One unexplored impact of vertical integration is the impact on referral patterns for common diagnostic tests and procedures and the associated spending. Using a 100 percent sample of 2013–16 Medicare fee-for-service claims data, we examined whether hospital and health system ownership of physician practices was associated with changes in site of care and Medicare reimbursement rates for ten common diagnostic imaging and laboratory services.
After vertical integration, the monthly number of diagnostic imaging tests per 1,000 attributed beneficiaries performed in a hospital setting increased by 26.3 per 1,000, and the number performed in a nonhospital setting decreased by 24.8 per 1,000. Hospital-based laboratory tests increased by 44.5 per 1,000 attributed beneficiaries, and non-hospital-based laboratory tests decreased by 36.0 per 1,000. Average Medicare reimbursement rose by $6.38 for imaging tests and $0.57 for laboratory tests, which translates to $40.2 million and $32.9 million increases in Medicare spending, respectively, for the entire study period. This study highlights how the growing trend of vertical integration, combined with differences in Medicare payment between hospitals and nonhospital providers, leads to higher Medicare spending.