neurology and the importance of localization

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

bulldog

Senior Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
553
Reaction score
1
It's been stressed by all the residents that u need to be able to localize. say if a patient w/ a hx of MS presents w/ decreased strength in his legs, but intact sensation, slightly brisk reflexes, u'd put recurrence as a most likely ddx. in terms of localizing the lesion, what can u comment on the region if no radiographic studies have been done?
 
There are plenty of basic books that go over localization in neurology. I think there is one called "Localization in Clinical Neurology".

Theoretically it's a straightforward thing to do. You are localizing to levels such as supratentorial, infratentorial/posterior fossa, spinal, peripheral nerve and so on. You should be able to do so from the sign and symptoms. For example, a spinal lesion should show a definite level and affect both motor and sensory.

Furthermore, you should be able to delineate the general category of lesion (vascular, neoplasm, etc.) from the temporal characteristics of the symptoms..
 
Just an FYI - spinal lesion do not have to effect both motor and sensory (i.e. tabes dorsalis).
 
Top