New BR Physics errata?

[SoftwareKevin]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Does anyone know if there's a public errata for the new BR physics books that just came out? Or maybe a place to report mistakes? I just received my copy and I've only been through the first two chapters and found many errors when referencing figure numbers and one example problem seemed to be missing the first sentence so it was hard to figure out what it was trying to ask 🙂

 

[CodeBlu]

Contact BerkReviewTeach, he floats around on here. He will be happy to forward comments to the guy who compiled and wrote the physics books.

 

[YouNeverKnow22]

just noticed an error on ex. 1.11

 

[TXKnight]

Does anyone know if there's a public errata for the new BR physics books that just came out? Or maybe a place to report mistakes? I just received my copy and I've only been through the first two chapters and found many errors when referencing figure numbers and one example problem seemed to be missing the first sentence so it was hard to figure out what it was trying to ask 🙂

I haven't caught any numerical/answer discrepancies (anyone?)...however, there are several figures and equations that are missing/mislabeled. I personally don't find that extremely annoying though. What kind of gets to me is the fact that we don't have a phase 3 for physics...😡

 

[apumic]

I haven't caught any numerical/answer discrepancies (anyone?)...however, there are several figures and equations that are missing/mislabeled. I personally don't find that extremely annoying though. What kind of gets to me is the fact that we don't have a phase 3 for physics...😡

You can substitute in other materials. TPRH Science Workbook is a good one to substitute for a phase. What I did for all science topics was do phase 1: odds + discretes; phase 2: evens (1-5 days later); phase 3: passages from EK & Kaplan (1 week later); phase 4: TPRH (4-6 weeks before exam). TBR is great but keep in mind that other perspectives are good to get anyway so take advantage of their blunder.

 

[mzblue]

Yep, i noticed the errata in chapter 1 and at first i was like what the blank are they talking about.

Does anyone know if there's a public errata for the new BR physics books that just came out? Or maybe a place to report mistakes? I just received my copy and I've only been through the first two chapters and found many errors when referencing figure numbers and one example problem seemed to be missing the first sentence so it was hard to figure out what it was trying to ask 🙂