- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 151
- Reaction score
- 0
What are schools that have begun in the last 5 years?
What are schools that have begun in the last 5 years?
Oakland University's medical school was accredited in 2007
Edit: Forgot to mention Touro-COM as well; first class enrolled in 2007
When I read this I thought you were talking about Oakland CA, aka weed capitol of California. I was like, oh hey, a school dedicated to training all the recent 'questionable' doctors in the state.
People like to talk about how new schools are useless without more residency slots a lot, but the fact of the matter is, if you rock the USMLE 1/2 and do well in your clerkships (because new schools are generally going to be developing clerkships at hospitals with educational programs - take for instance Virginia Tech Carilion doing rotations at Carilion Clinic hospitals which have been taking UVA students for years), even out of a new school, you're going to be able to match.New medical schools are completely irrelevant with out new residencies as well. Unfortunately its not happening...
New medical schools are completely irrelevant with out new residencies as well. Unfortunately its not happening...
You do realize a lot of residencies go unfilled every year right? Those medical schools will be pushing out a lot of much needed PCP's. It's the plan more or less, more MD's = higher competitiveness for specialists = more people going into primary care. It's a very good way of getting more people into primary care.
Except that increasing the number of medical school graduates will not change the number of PCPs. When people say ‘residencies go unfilled,' they mean there are residencies that have not been filled by a US MD, but these residencies will be filled by a DO or IMG. In the status quo, most US MDs choose to enter non-primary care residencies, but there is no shortage of DOs and IMGs who are willing to take the remaining primary care residencies. Therefore, by only increasing the number of US MDs, we will not increase the number of primary care physicians in this country, but rather all we will do is push more US MDs into residencies that would have otherwise been filled with a DO or IMG. This logic is similar to that of the underpants gnomes on South Park: Step I: increase the number of US Allopathic spots then Step II and then Step III: have more physicians.
So what you're saying is that under a constant an increased number of people will have no effect? Lets break this down, example: there are 200 spots for neurovasular surgery and this year there are 20 more people then there are spots. 20 will fail to get into those residencies and possibly be forced to scramble. There is a hierarchy a less competitive MD's who could have gotten away with getting into a competitive specialty will now see that it is unlikely for them to match into { insert competitive residency}. Thus they will intelligently opt for less competitive residencies or 2nd choices. Now apply this wave of logic to thousands and you have a lot more people going into primary care.
you completely missed the point, it being that filling primary care residencies with bodies is not a significant problem right now due to DO/IMG. without a corresponding increase in residency spots, all MD expansion does is a) increase competition among MD grads and b) push more people into residencies/specialties they don't want.So what you're saying is that under a constant an increased number of people will have no effect? Lets break this down, example: there are 200 spots for neurovasular surgery and this year there are 20 more people then there are spots. 20 will fail to get into those residencies and possibly be forced to scramble. There is a hierarchy a less competitive MD's who could have gotten away with getting into a competitive specialty will now see that it is unlikely for them to match into { insert competitive residency}. Thus they will intelligently opt for less competitive residencies or 2nd choices. Now apply this wave of logic to thousands and you have a lot more people going into primary care.
you completely missed the point, it being that filling primary care residencies with bodies is not a significant problem right now due to DO/IMG. without a corresponding increase in residency spots, all MD expansion does is a) increase competition among MD grads and b) push more people into residencies/specialties they don't want.
no it's not, did you not read my post? all it can do is increase the number of MD PCPs.I understand that point. I'm just saying putting more MD's out is a method of increasing the number of PCP's. Filling those residencies isn't what I was hoping to address, but that we still have a major deficiency of them.
no it's not, did you not read my post? all it can do is increase the number of MD PCPs.
I did, I was reiterating my position. Anyways you're trying to state that increasing MD PCP's isn't going to have a large affect because mostly DO's and IMG's take those positions. Well the ratio of MD to DO is like 10 : 1? And IMG's aren't going to be as lucky in the next matches. So I'm confused how increasing the number of MD PCP's =/= the point.
The point is simple.
MD, DO, or IMG/FMGs going into PC specialties are all the same. They will all be PCPs.
If you increase MDs into the pool, effectively reducing FMGs/IMGs from the pool, and the number of PC spots remains the same, you are having the same # of PCPs pumped into practice. The moment you increase spots to accommodate, the more PCPs will be pumped out.
This tactic of increasing MD and DO schools is effectively to increase the AMG presence in primary care.
However, You will always have some undesirable program that takes the remaining few FMGs/IMGs, hence also attempting to fill spots that normally do not fill. That may (I hope) be serenade's point about increasing PCPs.
The point is simple.
MD, DO, or IMG/FMGs going into PC specialties are all the same. They will all be PCPs.
If you increase MDs into the pool, effectively reducing FMGs/IMGs from the pool, and the number of PC spots remains the same, you are having the same # of PCPs pumped into practice. The moment you increase spots to accommodate, the more PCPs will be pumped out.
This tactic of increasing MD and DO schools is effectively to increase the AMG presence in primary care.
However, You will always have some undesirable program that takes the remaining few FMGs/IMGs, hence also attempting to fill spots that normally do not fill. That may (I hope) be serenade's point about increasing PCPs.