- Joined
- Dec 26, 2006
- Messages
- 7,128
- Reaction score
- 18,197
You answered your own question with your reply. The former pt you described has *KNOWN" CAD which presumably means a cardiovascular disease expert has determined that the CAD is non-obstructive, not causing symptoms, is being treated with optimal medical therapy, and thus doesn't need to be intervened upon procedurally.So... can you explain the cardiac risk difference between a patient with known CAD and greater than 4 METS going for TKA, and this pt w rate controlled AF and greater than 4 METS who may but most likely do not have CAD? Why is >4 METS an acceptable method of assessing perioperative MACE risk for everyone other than AF?
OTOH, we essentially don't know anything about why this guy has new onset aflutter and what kind of rhythm control / AC he needs.