- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 0
The last poll seemed to have some issues... 🙂
it would be funny if it was a normal distribution
also... 12 and 15? Isn't that a bit ridiculous as well?
in the previous thread one person had like 14 or 15!
hehe, that was me. I got an invite while I was replying to someone.
I also commented on your MDApps profile. Are you a real person? 😛
Did you do IB at Merrill? What group? Happy you're not working at literally the Bank of America now? hehe
yeah, I'm curious what you guys did at Merrill.
And what's wrong with BofA? My favorite stock over the past few months--basically paid for half my college tuition.
I sold BAC at 8 at a loss. 🙁
Wow, betting your college fund on a bank in which common shareholders still risk being diluted to nothing due in part to warrants held by Treasury takes guts. Glad all us pre-meds aren't so risk-averse. 🙂
why would the warrants be executed? BAC raised all the capital required by the stress tests by the preferred to common exchange, asset sales, and other swaps--in fact I believe it was 4 or 5 billion in excess of the 34B the gov't asked for. Not only that, they did it in record speed, while other supposedly "stronger" banks like WFC were still twiddling their thumbs.
BAC is going to be an earnings powerhouse in a few years, particularly because the ML purchase will be looked back on as an excellent move. Yeah, they overpaid, but in healthier market conditions (which we are seeing), ML can earn 15B per year. I love how they are expanding their presence in emerging markets, particularly India and China. Normalized earnings for the retail banking/Countrywide is like 30B--so 45B, which I think is a conservative estimate for normalized income.
Now let's say they have to issue an additional 2B shares to pay back TARP and re-purchase warrants. They currently have 8B shares outstanding, so after all is said and done, let's say they have 10B outstanding. 45B/10B = 4.5 EPS x 10 PE (typical for banks) = $45.00
BAC is at least a double from here 2-3 years down the road. It holds 12% of all deposits in the U.S. The steep yield curve is free money for them.
so if i invest in BAC i'm gonna make bank?
so if i invest in BAC i'm gonna make bank?
0, I'm still waiting for my first.
yes, you can bank on it 😉
but, seriously, it's my personal favorite. I'm overweight the entire financial sector though, and I tend to be a contrarian investor. I still think lots of fund managers are under-invested in financials because their earnings will not improve significantly until Q3 or Q4 2010. That said, you've got to go for what's not popular if you want to make real money.
The recession is almost certainly over, but the recovery will be slow, and unemployment will stay high for some time, which will keep a lid on housing prices and likely put pressure on credit card portfolios. But that's why these stocks are 50 and 60% off their highs. In other words, I think risk is fairly priced at these levels.
Do your own due diligence, as always.
sometimes i wish i majored in finance 🙁
I'm long GS and GE at the moment. Let's hope you are right!
yeah me too. I would like to explore MD/MBA as a potential option down the road, but that depends on a lot of things.
nice, they've both done very well recently. do you hedge with options at all?
No, I've never seen the logic in a protected put unless some arbitrage were readily apparent, but arbitrage opportunities are rare and if they exist they would be arbed away quickly. Plus I've been a bit busy with secondaries and interviews these days so I'd imagine I wouldn't be the first to find one anyway. 🙂
how would a financially ignorant person go about learning about investing in the market?
how would a financially ignorant person go about learning about investing in the market?
Thanks Blue! Me too![]()
Well if you share my beliefs (obviously they are contradictory b/c I would just buy an S&P index fund if I thought no one could really beat the market and most of the leading academics in the field have managed hedge funds a la LTCM at one point), then an efficient market protects fools from themselves and it doesn't really matter what you buy.
If you are in the Contrarian camp, then you would buy a bunch of books or read random blogs like seeking alpha.
For most retail investors, I think just reading wsj.com and maybe the finance and business sections of economist.com and becoming versed with the markets is a logical approach.
how would a financially ignorant person go about learning about investing in the market?
Also, EMH, really? It doesn't really account for why asset bubbles occur... at all... I mean, how could you possibly believe in EMH having seen the ridiculous volatility and information asymmetry in the last year!
http://emlab.berkeley.edu/pub/econ/ugrad/theses/iulia_stefan_thesis.pdf
I do of course believe that there are herding effects and markets tend to overshoot and undershoot. Behavioral economists study this. But just as people aren't completely rational and self-interested, basic economic concepts are refined rather than abandoned. The EMH and Random Walk Theory are probably as central a paradigm in asset pricing as evolution is in biology.
And, no, I wasn't a finance major.
Well, it's certainly an eminent model, as it's clearly the basis for a lot of subsequent economic work but to compare it to evolution in biology would be a bit of a stretch... evolution is the underlying principle for virtually all of biology... It is well supported with empirical data and there are no significant alternatives to challenge its validity (erm, shall I say no *rational* alternatives).
EMH is not nearly as central to the entire field of financial economics and there are several other potentially valid models refuting its claims (Fama himself later had his doubts). Behavioral finance may completely usurp EMH entirely if they can build empirical models to explain investor irrationality.