No relief

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
You are probably pretty safe doing that unless a patient presents in extremis after 0700 while you are still in the ED. Then, I’d say that all bets are off - your license and ass are on the line if you do not render aid.

On the other hand, telling your charge nurse to shut down triage an hour early is really bad advice.

It’s all a game of risk management. In the end, we are all adults and probably shouldn’t need the internet to tell us how to act in any given set of circumstances.
Nope. That's why you cover the sign. If the emergency sign is covered, and there's a notice on the door, you're scot free. I know you don't want them to be, and would instead make this the EPs problem, but that's how we shut EDs down.
This is not in any way shape or form like covering for another doc who is late because of traffic or whatever.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Nope. That's why you cover the sign. If the emergency sign is covered, and there's a notice on the door, you're scot free. I know you don't want them to be, and would instead make this the EPs problem, but that's how we shut EDs down.
This is not in any way shape or form like covering for another doc who is late because of traffic or whatever.

Again, we’re all adults. People are free to follow your advice.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Have you ever shut down an ED? Yes or no? The company I work for has. I know exactly how to do it legally.

Thanks to Hurricane Florence, I got a front row seat to an entire hospital being shut down. It was not as simple as covering a sign and posting a notice. Our hospital counsel required us to provide advanced notice to EMS agencies, the news, etc. We coordinated with facilities as far away as the Piedmont Region in NC and SC in case we couldn’t reopen in a timely manner.

Let me get this straight, you think that an independent contractor working for a CMG is going to post a sign that the ED is closed? That is what we are talking about here.
 
Thanks to Hurricane Florence, I got a front row seat to an entire hospital being shut down. It was not as simple as covering a sign and posting a notice. Our hospital counsel required us to provide advanced notice to EMS agencies, the news, etc. We coordinated with facilities as far away as the Piedmont Region in NC and SC in case we couldn’t reopen in a timely manner.

Let me get this straight, you think that an independent contractor working for a CMG is going to post a sign that the ED is closed? That is what we are talking about here.

Your hospital counsel was being conservative. We've had to close places with only a few hours notice. Yes, you should tell EMS, but you don't have to. The law literally says you just have to cover up the word "Emergency" (and whatever after it), and post a sign on the door. That's it.
The other stuff is nicety. You don't have to coordinate with anyone to help you shut down. What do you think hospitals that catch fire do? The hospital in Joplin that got hit by a tornado?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Your hospital counsel was being conservative. We've had to close places with only a few hours notice. Yes, you should tell EMS, but you don't have to. The law literally says you just have to cover up the word "Emergency" (and whatever after it), and post a sign on the door. That's it.
The other stuff is nicety. You don't have to coordinate with anyone to help you shut down. What do you think hospitals that catch fire do? The hospital in Joplin that got hit by a tornado?

No, our counsel was being prudent. On the other hand, shutting down an ED because there is nobody scheduled on a shift would be imprudent. That is because hospital administrators and CMGs are generally able to scrounge someone at the last minute or within an hour or two, and shutting down the ED may pose a disproportionate risk to the community. These situations literally happen all the time; some group in the hospital, be it the ED, anesthesia, or hospitalist, has a staffing crunch. In almost every case except natural disasters, the hospital doesn’t have to shut down vital areas like the ED and administration makes it happen. I’ve seen hospital board members who were largely retired admitting patients in the ED when the hospitalist CMG floundered. Yes, sometimes people stay late; there are even cases of physicians not being paid by unethical / insolvent CMGs, but these abuses are pretty rare. Is it ideal or safe - no.

The other issue is that physicians working for CMGs are not hospital employees. They have no authority to shut down vital areas of the hospital. Independent contractors who take it upon themselves to function like hospital employees take on a ton of exposure. At the very least, this includes threatening their status as an independent contractor in the eyes of Uncle Sam by performing hospital operations which are actions of an employee. For those with indemnification causes in their contract, the exposure is “yuge.”

Bottom line is - be smart. Feel free to negotiate what you think is a fair wage for your overtime, but be aware of the provisions in your contract. Focus on what is right for your patients. Don’t do stupid stuff that will threaten your license.
 
The other issue is that physicians working for CMGs are not hospital employees. They have no authority to shut down vital areas of the hospital. Independent contractors who take it upon themselves to function like hospital employees take on a ton of exposure. At the very least, this includes threatening their status as an independent contractor in the eyes of Uncle Sam by performing hospital operations which are actions of an employee. For those with indemnification causes in their contract, the exposure is “yuge.”
Except where state law requires a physician to be a licensed Emergency Department. If your being there is a requirement for licensure (and it is), then yes, you leaving shuts it down. You're not the one doing it, the lack of staffing is. Also, the IRS doesn't care about our IC status, because we simply aren't by law, we just get loopholed into it by companies who don't want to pay overtime, benefits, or both sides of SS.

Nobody is saying this isn't the nuclearest of nuclear options. But then again, any company that doesn't bother providing relief for you doesn't care about you or the hospital. Fire all your arrows at the staffing company, and if they won't play, then calling admin is how you get the problem solved. You're never going to work there again anyway most likely. If you are, you get what you deserve.

The number of times shutting the ER down has happened is zero as far as I'm aware, but the number of times it's gotten to the "day of" scenario is much, much more frequent. Your answer of "keep your head down" is the absolute worst thing you can do. I'm sorry, it just is. This isn't a simple oversight that you should work through. This is intentional malfeasance on the part of the staffing company. Nothing but. You owe them nothing. If you died on shift, they would have the job posted before you got cold. Don't die for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Except where state law requires a physician to be a licensed Emergency Department. If your being there is a requirement for licensure (and it is), then yes, you leaving shuts it down. You're not the one doing it, the lack of staffing is. Also, the IRS doesn't care about our IC status, because we simply aren't by law, we just get loopholed into it by companies who don't want to pay overtime, benefits, or both sides of SS.

Nobody is saying this isn't the nuclearest of nuclear options. But then again, any company that doesn't bother providing relief for you doesn't care about you or the hospital. Fire all your arrows at the staffing company, and if they won't play, then calling admin is how you get the problem solved. You're never going to work there again anyway most likely. If you are, you get what you deserve.

The number of times shutting the ER down has happened is zero as far as I'm aware, but the number of times it's gotten to the "day of" scenario is much, much more frequent. Your answer of "keep your head down" is the absolute worst thing you can do. I'm sorry, it just is. This isn't a simple oversight that you should work through. This is intentional malfeasance on the part of the staffing company. Nothing but. You owe them nothing. If you died on shift, they would have the job posted before you got cold. Don't die for it.

That is a strange definition of keeping one’s head down. However, if you think that threatening to shut down the ED has moved mountains for you, then by all means - game on. Great discussion.
 
That is a strange definition of keeping one’s head down. However, if you think that threatening to shut down the ED has moved mountains for you, then by all means - game on. Great discussion.
You'll note that I'm not alone, and honestly, you're the one on an island here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
No, my perspective means that a EP who is not a hospital employee telling hospital staff to shut down triage an hour before their shift is over is cruise’n for a bruise’n. If you disagree, by all means go right ahead and do that.

Let me pull a little bit of rank here. I have served as a medical director and chief of the medical staff at different institutions since likely before you were born. I have also served on my state medical board. I am familiar with the appropriate laws and regulations. Perhaps your career path has changed, but your user name suggest that you are not familiar with emergency medicine.

Rule #1: The senior attending physician in an ED has the right to shut down triage, or the ED, employee or not. That has been the case since there has been an "emergency room" and long before attending physicians as employees was even thought of. Do you want to make a guess the number of times in my career that I have shut down/gone on diversion during my career? Never once was I a hospital employee.

Diversions, if not common, are not rare in emergency medicine. Even those states that have implemented legislation to prevent diversions due to over-crowding have retained the ability for a facility to go on diversion for issues that effect the ability to provide patient care. In every institution that I am familiar with, the ability to make such a determination has been left in the hands of the senior attending physician present and in charge of the emergency department. No utilities? Sorry, we are closed (depending on the place). Confirmed case of Ebola? Shut down (again depends on the facility). Nurse's friend's kid had a case of diarrhea at school? Well, infection control wanted me to shut down. No qualified provider after 1200? Then we are shutting down.

It has been determined that the failure to provide care for a patient after a physician-patient relationship has been established is patient abandonment. However, it has also been established that there is no requirement to provide care for future patients; e.g., if a physician's contract expires on 1 July, he has no duty of care toward patients who might be referred after that date.

So, yes, a physician does have the ability and duty to refuse to accept patients if he is aware the facility will not be able to provide patient care after a certain time. Informed the generator is down (not rare at a small critical access place) and power will be out at 1400? Then you better not be accepting patients at 1300, even if it turns out the outage is cancelled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15 users
You only out rank me if you made it to O-6. On the other hand, I’ve been boarded, practicing, and teaching emergency medicine for 18 years.

We are mostly discussing a post where someone suggested shutting down triage and hour before their shift ended because the was a hole in the schedule and, to a lesser extent, of physicians walking out a minute after their shift if salary demands are not met. We are not talking about a generator failure or natural disaster shutting down the ED. That is moving the goal post on the discussion.

In my 18 years of doing this, I’ve seen countless schedule holes. I’ve also seen plenty of turnovers in group contracts where physicians on different sides of the isle worked to make sure patients were handed over in a safe manner. On the other hand, I’ve not seen an ED shut down once due to a single hole in the schedule...not...once. Keep in mind that I worked as a site doc and FF for EMP for seven of those years, as well as part time for EMCare and Apollo - not once. I’ve also never seen an ED doc walk off their shift without making sure that all of their patients were safe. Again, not...fricken...once. While I’m on a roll, another suggestion that I’ve never seen done is an EP calling up hospital administration and threatening to leave. Sure, there have been some direct conversations between EPs and administration. But the tone in every case that I’ve heard from the EPs side has focused on patient safety rather than, “give me $X or I’m outta here.” I‘d say it’s a testament to our collective professionalism when we are off the internet.

So, it comes down to a situation where a group on the internet are advocating someone do something (i.e. shut down an ED over a single schedule hole) that none of them have ever actually done themselves. Feel free to chime in if you have actually shut down triage over a single schedule hole and shuttered your department. Along the way, there is a familiar tone of holding the CMGs accountable and fighting the power. I get it, CMGs are not too popular and I won’t work for them now either. However, let’s be honest, none of us are really going to walk of our shift or shutdown anything over a schedule hole. Capisce Pisano?
 
Except where state law requires a physician to be a licensed Emergency Department.
Is there a state that requires this?
And, more broadly, what does this this sentence mean? A state law that requires a physician to cover the ED? Or a state law that requires a physician covering the ED to be a licensed Emergency Physician?
 
Is there a state that requires this?
And, more broadly, what does this this sentence mean? A state law that requires a physician to cover the ED? Or a state law that requires a physician covering the ED to be a licensed Emergency Physician?
Texas has a law that any hospital has to have an emergency room, and that emergency room has to be staffed 24/7 by a physician. They have allowances for rural counties that the doc can be on call. Other states do allow PA/NP single coverage, but not Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Members don't see this ad :)
In my 18 years of doing this, I’ve seen countless schedule holes. I’ve also seen plenty of turnovers in group contracts where physicians on different sides of the isle worked to make sure patients were handed over in a safe manner. On the other hand, I’ve not seen an ED shut down once due to a single hole in the schedule...not...once. Keep in mind that I worked as a site doc and FF for EMP for seven of those years, as well as part time for EMCare and Apollo - not once. I’ve also never seen an ED doc walk off their shift without making sure that all of their patients were safe. Again, not...fricken...once. While I’m on a roll, another suggestion that I’ve never seen done is an EP calling up hospital administration and threatening to leave. Sure, there have been some direct conversations between EPs and administration. But the tone in every case that I’ve heard from the EPs side has focused on patient safety rather than, “give me $X or I’m outta here.” I‘d say it’s a testament to our collective professionalism when we are off the internet.
I think you're pushing this towards hyperbole. We've all see hundreds of schedule holes. Those typically involve some degree of scrambling to cover. There is lots of communication. Even last minute problems like people missing their flight, or having a car wreck, or whatever. Nobody is walking off the job for those.
This is about a hole that's been there all month, and multiple lines of communication opened but never responded to, and now the doc is tasked with going in to a shift where there is no relief scheduled. Maybe that doc has a flight home, or a birthday party, or whatever. It's not his responsibility to keep the place open.
Just like with EMTALA violations, you only go nuclear when there's no other option.
In your scenario of "keep working", how many hours should the doc keep working? 1, 2, 6, or all 12? What if they're 24 hour shifts and there's a hole?
None of us would threaten this flippantly "Oh great, Dr. McNinja is working again, guess we'll be closing the ER", but at the end of the day, the doc has to have something.
And in the cases I've known where people actually did call the CEO about this, the problem got solved. CMGs respond to the hospital much faster than they do to the line docs. So if you plan on doing this, make the first CEO call before midnight, and let them know you'll be calling back at 0 dark 30 if nothing is fixed. It's been fixed 100% of the time. The ER never has to be shut down (for this).

But shutting down ERs for any reason isn't hard, as I've explained above. Be it finances, internal or external disaster, or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I think you're pushing this towards hyperbole. We've all see hundreds of schedule holes. Those typically involve some degree of scrambling to cover. There is lots of communication. Even last minute problems like people missing their flight, or having a car wreck, or whatever. Nobody is walking off the job for those.
This is about a hole that's been there all month, and multiple lines of communication opened but never responded to, and now the doc is tasked with going in to a shift where there is no relief scheduled. Maybe that doc has a flight home, or a birthday party, or whatever. It's not his responsibility to keep the place open.
Just like with EMTALA violations, you only go nuclear when there's no other option.
In your scenario of "keep working", how many hours should the doc keep working? 1, 2, 6, or all 12? What if they're 24 hour shifts and there's a hole?
None of us would threaten this flippantly "Oh great, Dr. McNinja is working again, guess we'll be closing the ER", but at the end of the day, the doc has to have something.
And in the cases I've known where people actually did call the CEO about this, the problem got solved. CMGs respond to the hospital much faster than they do to the line docs. So if you plan on doing this, make the first CEO call before midnight, and let them know you'll be calling back at 0 dark 30 if nothing is fixed. It's been fixed 100% of the time. The ER never has to be shut down (for this).

But shutting down ERs for any reason isn't hard, as I've explained above. Be it finances, internal or external disaster, or whatever.
Yeah I think you just have to be persistent in your attempts to get coverage and document everything. I think you avoid legal trouble this way.

That being said, nothing to stop the CMG from disposing of you a month later via termination without cause.
 
Yeah I think you just have to be persistent in your attempts to get coverage and document everything. I think you avoid legal trouble this way.

That being said, nothing to stop the CMG from disposing of you a month later via termination without cause.
Meh, any decent person won't go back to that job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I think you're pushing this towards hyperbole. We've all see hundreds of schedule holes. Those typically involve some degree of scrambling to cover. There is lots of communication. Even last minute problems like people missing their flight, or having a car wreck, or whatever. Nobody is walking off the job for those.
This is about a hole that's been there all month, and multiple lines of communication opened but never responded to, and now the doc is tasked with going in to a shift where there is no relief scheduled. Maybe that doc has a flight home, or a birthday party, or whatever. It's not his responsibility to keep the place open.
Just like with EMTALA violations, you only go nuclear when there's no other option.
In your scenario of "keep working", how many hours should the doc keep working? 1, 2, 6, or all 12? What if they're 24 hour shifts and there's a hole?
None of us would threaten this flippantly "Oh great, Dr. McNinja is working again, guess we'll be closing the ER", but at the end of the day, the doc has to have something.
And in the cases I've known where people actually did call the CEO about this, the problem got solved. CMGs respond to the hospital much faster than they do to the line docs. So if you plan on doing this, make the first CEO call before midnight, and let them know you'll be calling back at 0 dark 30 if nothing is fixed. It's been fixed 100% of the time. The ER never has to be shut down (for this).

But shutting down ERs for any reason isn't hard, as I've explained above. Be it finances, internal or external disaster, or whatever.

So, I got involved in this thread to provide an alternative perspective when someone suggested that they might tell the charge nurse to close triage an hour before their shift ends. In addition, I suggested that physicians should make every effort to insure safe handoff of their patients regardless of how long it takes or how much they are being paid. How long they stay after the shift is going to depend on a number of variables that will differ with every situation. At no point did I say that doctors should continue to see patients ad infinitum.

As for the hyperbole, this thread has seen posters say they are pulling rank, that it isn’t hard to shut down an ED, and that there are rules that allow EPs to be the final arbiter of when a hospital will close its ED. I don’t think that the hyperbole comes from my frequency, but you are free to disagree.

Now for one last dose of reality: nobody in this thread out ranks me and I’m nothing special either; it seems that getting the hospital admin to go on diversion at most places is like pulling teeth, much less temporarily shutting everything down; and nobody in this thread has ever (or ever will) close any part of an ED without significant input and approval from the hospital leadership.
 
As the Only Doc in the ER, you can not morally or professionally leave. It sucks but if you leave, every inpatient and ER pt will be abandoned by you. If I left, and someone died b/c there was no doc in the area I would not be able to forgive myself. Place on top of this, the book will be thrown at you. You will be reported to the Board and would likely lose your license. At best, you will be reported and will have to explain this at every hospital you try to get credentials. Likely you will never be credentialed at any decent hospital again. I know I would never vote to credential you.

As this is your last shift, the best thing is to fire off emails requesting 3-5x rate. If they refuse, fire of an email stating that you are endangering pts working over 12 hrs. Likely they will find someone or pay your ransom.

BUT whoever told you to leave without coverage just gave the worse advice I have read on here.
This is nonsensical. YOu would be a slave. Take what you said the the extreme. No one shows up for a month. You think you are on the hook. GTF OOH. Fire off the emails and go from there. To think you are somehow on the hook in perpetuity because no one shows up is dumb.

These things work out cause the hospital has much to lose. So does the CMG. I wouldn’t let them hold me hostage. I would also let them know thats the case immediately.

Emergent let me ask you a hypothetical. Doc is at hospital lets say. 1 hour from home. You have a child, you are single. kid is in kindergarten. For the sake of the hypothetical you are supposed to get off work at 2 and kid gets off the bus at 4. You have plenty of time. Your relief doesn’t come in and the relief is gonna be there at 10 pm. You have no local family or people you really know since you moved to town 3 days ago. What do you do?
 
This is nonsensical. YOu would be a slave. Take what you said the the extreme. No one shows up for a month. You think you are on the hook. GTF OOH. Fire off the emails and go from there. To think you are somehow on the hook in perpetuity because no one shows up is dumb.

These things work out cause the hospital has much to lose. So does the CMG. I wouldn’t let them hold me hostage. I would also let them know thats the case immediately.

Emergent let me ask you a hypothetical. Doc is at hospital lets say. 1 hour from home. You have a child, you are single. kid is in kindergarten. For the sake of the hypothetical you are supposed to get off work at 2 and kid gets off the bus at 4. You have plenty of time. Your relief doesn’t come in and the relief is gonna be there at 10 pm. You have no local family or people you really know since you moved to town 3 days ago. What do you do?
Take my kid to the 4:30 star wars release, and then ice cream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
So, I got involved in this thread to provide an alternative perspective when someone suggested that they might tell the charge nurse to close triage an hour before their shift ends. In addition, I suggested that physicians should make every effort to insure safe handoff of their patients regardless of how long it takes or how much they are being paid. How long they stay after the shift is going to depend on a number of variables that will differ with every situation. At no point did I say that doctors should continue to see patients ad infinitum.

As for the hyperbole, this thread has seen posters say they are pulling rank, that it isn’t hard to shut down an ED, and that there are rules that allow EPs to be the final arbiter of when a hospital will close its ED. I don’t think that the hyperbole comes from my frequency, but you are free to disagree.

Now for one last dose of reality: nobody in this thread out ranks me and I’m nothing special either; it seems that getting the hospital admin to go on diversion at most places is like pulling teeth, much less temporarily shutting everything down; and nobody in this thread has ever (or ever will) close any part of an ED without significant input and approval from the hospital leadership.
Right. Call the CMO/CEOCNO/ CMG and tell them. Patients wait for. 12 Hours or more to be seen by a doc. If not in extremis. Bye bye. Also regarding inpatients. they are most definitely not the ED docs fault. It is foolish to think that just cause you are there you are also responsible for them. We wait when colleagues oversleep or get stuck in traffic cause we would want that for ourselves and we are decent people. To think EDs havenot gone on diversion is silly. Happens all the time due to volume, inpatients, ED holds. This is equivalent to an internal disaster.

I also said I would call everyone and anyone ay in advance to alert them of the pending issue. People who say you shouldn’t do it dont take the issue to its logical conclusion. Also, I assume most of you never worked in a low resourced ED where getting people to cover is an issue. Why would they pay 3x if they can just keep you there til the next person is on the schedule. They pay those rates cause your job isnt to work indefinitely.
 
Obv
Take my kid to the 4:30 star wars release, and then ice cream.
obvious answer. Someone’s business issue isnt my personal problem. If it is my ED contract or my hospital then it is my problem. As an ED doc this isnt your issue. I would also expend zero energy for the CMG to get the shift covered. If I’m not the ED director and I dont own this contract this isnt my problem.
 
This is nonsensical. YOu would be a slave. Take what you said the the extreme. No one shows up for a month. You think you are on the hook. GTF OOH. Fire off the emails and go from there. To think you are somehow on the hook in perpetuity because no one shows up is dumb.

These things work out cause the hospital has much to lose. So does the CMG. I wouldn’t let them hold me hostage. I would also let them know thats the case immediately.

Emergent let me ask you a hypothetical. Doc is at hospital lets say. 1 hour from home. You have a child, you are single. kid is in kindergarten. For the sake of the hypothetical you are supposed to get off work at 2 and kid gets off the bus at 4. You have plenty of time. Your relief doesn’t come in and the relief is gonna be there at 10 pm. You have no local family or people you really know since you moved to town 3 days ago. What do you do?
You will generally wrap up your patients as best as possible and coordinate with your director and admin to meet both your patient and childcare responsibilities.

However, keep in mind that many (most?) CMG contracts contain statements that you will be available for specified times before and/or after a scheduled shift. I think that it was 3 hours when I started working at EMP back in 2006. These buffer periods were almost never used at my shop but I’ve heard stories from EMCare of being called in early and told to stay late. They were created to largely deal with the very situation that we are discussing.
 
I have reviewed a ton of contracts for my residents never seen a clause like this. Maybe USACS ex EMP has this cause they treat their docs worse than dirt. I have reviewed Team, Envision and a handful of employed contracts. I have never seen this language.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
However, keep in mind that many (most?) CMG contracts contain statements that you will be available for specified times before and/or after a scheduled shift. I think that it was 3 hours when I started working at EMP back in 2006.

I've only seen this once. No one told me about it. I found it in the contract. Four hours on either end of the shift, so you could be made to work 16 hours for every 8 hours scheduled. I did not sign that contract.
 
I have reviewed a ton of contracts for my residents never seen a clause like this. Maybe USACS ex EMP has this cause they treat their docs worse than dirt. I have reviewed Team, Envision and a handful of employed contracts. I have never seen this language.

It’s been 7+ years since I was in the CMG game so it may have changed. I recall this becoming an issue at an EMP site. At the time which as long before USACS, we were their largest contract (~20 FT) and there was a need to address call outs. One option was to begin invoking the buffer clause and the other was to create an on-call shift. Ultimately, we chose the latter with the stipulation that on-call would only be used for call outs, never department crowding.

EMPs sister company, EPMG, had it at most of their sites if memory serves. These were all FT employee contracts. I’d be surprised if a IC contract could swing something like that.
 
I've only seen this once. No one told me about it. I found it in the contract. Four hours on either end of the shift, so you could be made to work 16 hours for every 8 hours scheduled. I did not sign that contract.
I’m not saying it’s not there but I’ve viewed 100s of contracts literally. Never seen it.
 
However, keep in mind that many (most?) CMG contracts contain statements that you will be available for specified times before and/or after a scheduled shift.
I've never seen that language, and I've worked for Schumacher, Team Health, EmCare, and 3 other private groups.
You must really work in hellholes if your contract includes that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
And, I will say this with the utmost respect. I bet you feel this way because your other job actually does own you. Whatever service you got to the rank of full bird or Captain could tell you to stand in front of a cannon and you would have to.
We aren't commissioned or owned by anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
And, I will say this with the utmost respect. I bet you feel this way because your other job actually does own you. Whatever service you got to the rank of full bird or Captain could tell you to stand in front of a cannon and you would have to.
We aren't commissioned or owned by anyone.

Umm, probably not.


I sense a very transactional tone from your posts and others in this thread. Speaking abstractly, I’d imagine such frequent use of words like own, slave, servant, etc. all suggest a poor prognosis for career longevity in any field.

Rather than psychoanalyze you over the internet, I’ll simply share that I left EM for another speciality a year ago. I didn’t like being part of a speciality where increasing numbers of patients felt a right to my labor. That, and I suppose I have strained interpersonal interactions with healthy “patients” in emergency departments. Anyway, I left a cush faculty gig at age 46 and it absolutely was the best career decision that I ever made.
 
This is nonsensical. YOu would be a slave. Take what you said the the extreme. No one shows up for a month. You think you are on the hook. GTF OOH. Fire off the emails and go from there. To think you are somehow on the hook in perpetuity because no one shows up is dumb.

These things work out cause the hospital has much to lose. So does the CMG. I wouldn’t let them hold me hostage. I would also let them know thats the case immediately.

Emergent let me ask you a hypothetical. Doc is at hospital lets say. 1 hour from home. You have a child, you are single. kid is in kindergarten. For the sake of the hypothetical you are supposed to get off work at 2 and kid gets off the bus at 4. You have plenty of time. Your relief doesn’t come in and the relief is gonna be there at 10 pm. You have no local family or people you really know since you moved to town 3 days ago. What do you do?

I am not saying be a slave. I am not saying you need to stay for another 12 hrs or some ridiculous amount of time. You can't take every situation to the extreme to make your point.

I am just saying if noone shows up, just escalate the issue and you will not get to even 5 hrs after your shift was supposed to end. Threaten the CMG that you will have to leave or I call the CMO/CEO which usually will solve it. If this doesn't work then tell the staff that you will only do MSE, divert EMS, and take care of critical patients. This will always work. If not, just the CEO you are going to call safe harbor.

To your hypothetical situation, As an ER doc I have to always have a contingency b/c I can never guarantee that I will leave on time. I have a stay at home wife so I don't have to worry but if I was a single parent, I would always have someone as a back up.

As an Er doc, you can always pay someone to be on contingency. I would have paid someone to be avail just in case. As an Er doc, you never know if you could be 3 hrs late from leaving. It can be any situation. I have had a patient come in with a HA that should have been an in/out but didn't see the fever and neck stiffness which is going to take me 3-4 hrs to get her out. Or a Crash patient come in right at the end of my shift. Or a code blue right at the end of my shift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Call safe harbor?...what does that mean and what would it do?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I am not saying be a slave. I am not saying you need to stay for another 12 hrs or some ridiculous amount of time. You can't take every situation to the extreme to make your point.

I am just saying if no one shows up, just escalate the issue and you will not get to even 5 hrs after your shift was supposed to end. Threaten the CMG that you will have to leave or I call the CMO/CEO which usually will solve it. If this doesn't work then tell the staff that you will only do MSE, divert EMS, and take care of critical patients. This will always work. If not, just the CEO you are going to call safe harbor.

To your hypothetical situation, As an ER doc I have to always have a contingency b/c I can never guarantee that I will leave on time. I have a stay at home wife so I don't have to worry but if I was a single parent, I would always have someone as a back up.

As an Er doc, you can always pay someone to be on contingency. I would have paid someone to be avail just in case. As an Er doc, you never know if you could be 3 hrs late from leaving. It can be any situation. I have had a patient come in with a HA that should have been an in/out but didn't see the fever and neck stiffness which is going to take me 3-4 hrs to get her out. Or a Crash patient come in right at the end of my shift. Or a code blue right at the end of my shift.

I’m still waiting for an verified instance of an EP shutting down the entire ED or even leaving the ED uncovered because the CMG couldn’t plug a schedule hole. I’m not talking about a generator failure, natural disaster, or freestanding going out of business - I want to hear from the people who singlehandedly did what some are suggesting.

I always had good relationships with my charge nurses. They kept me grounded when bad ideas came into my head. I image one in particular would have sat me down, propped my legs up, cracked an ice pack for the back of my neck, given me a diet Dr. Pepper to sip on, and then told me that I had 5 minutes to find my %$@# mind had I told her that I was going to shut down triage because the CMG hadn’t scheduled my relief.
 
I’m still waiting for an verified instance of an EP shutting down the entire ED or even leaving the ED uncovered because the CMG couldn’t plug a schedule hole. I’m not talking about a generator failure, natural disaster, or freestanding going out of business - I want to hear from the people who singlehandedly did what some are suggesting.

I always had good relationships with my charge nurses. They kept me grounded when bad ideas came into my head. I image one in particular would have sat me down, propped my legs up, cracked an ice pack for the back of my neck, given me a diet Dr. Pepper to sip on, and then told me that I had 5 minutes to find my %$@# mind had I told her that I was going to shut down triage because the CMG hadn’t scheduled my relief.
mayeb you worked at functional places. i believe someone gave an example of this in Mississippi. most BCEM docs dont work in the sticks so its not an issue.
 
I’m still waiting for an verified instance of an EP shutting down the entire ED or even leaving the ED uncovered because the CMG couldn’t plug a schedule hole. I’m not talking about a generator failure, natural disaster, or freestanding going out of business - I want to hear from the people who singlehandedly did what some are suggesting.

I always had good relationships with my charge nurses. They kept me grounded when bad ideas came into my head. I image one in particular would have sat me down, propped my legs up, cracked an ice pack for the back of my neck, given me a diet Dr. Pepper to sip on, and then told me that I had 5 minutes to find my %$@# mind had I told her that I was going to shut down triage because the CMG hadn’t scheduled my relief.

I have heard of one doc doing this because another overslept his shift. Basically walked out after an overnight shift. He is no longer practicing emergency medicine. Not sure if this kept him from getting another job or if he was just burned out to begin with.
 
I’m still waiting for an verified instance of an EP shutting down the entire ED or even leaving the ED uncovered because the CMG couldn’t plug a schedule hole.
The point we have tried to make is that it has never gotten to that point. Just making the threat is enough. Of course, if you're going to threaten it, you have to go through with it. But yeah, day of, no coverage, gonna start making phone calls.
 
My EM brothers can stand on their staunch rock but beware that you have little control after that rock crumbles.

Walk away and the hospital, nursing staff, patients, CMG can all report you to the Board. The Hospital can revoke your privileges and you have to detail this on every application.

Good luck finding another EM job with that perceived patient abandonment mark on your record.

You may feel great standing your ground but won't if you can't find a job with a worthless EM degree.

I know the private groups I have worked with in the past would put your application into the shredder on arrival.
 
My EM brothers can stand on their staunch rock but beware that you have little control after that rock crumbles.

Walk away and the hospital, nursing staff, patients, CMG can all report you to the Board. The Hospital can revoke your privileges and you have to detail this on every application.

Good luck finding another EM job with that perceived patient abandonment mark on your record.

You may feel great standing your ground but won't if you can't find a job with a worthless EM degree.

I know the private groups I have worked with in the past would put your application into the shredder on arrival.

Again it's not patient abandonment if you haven't established a relationship with patient. One could very well sue a hospital system/CMG group for big dollars if they took any punitive action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
The point we have tried to make is that it has never gotten to that point. Just making the threat is enough. Of course, if you're going to threaten it, you have to go through with it. But yeah, day of, no coverage, gonna start making phone calls.

The point that I’m trying to make is that threatening to leave and telling the hospital administrators that you’re shutting down the ED is a silly, empty threat. It’s the kind of thing that makes your colleagues (especially the nurses) roll their eyes and think that you’re a cowboy or something worse.

Listen, I’m all for some direct emails to your director and even keeping the administration informed about the issue. Feel free to threaten your director if you want to burn some bridges. However, I’m going to go out on a limb and assume that there are some student doctors on studentdoctor.net watching this thread unfold. I’m going to provide them with an alternative perspective, no matter how unpopular, that calling the CMO/CEO’s and telling them that you are shutting down their ED is bad for a career; telling nurses that you are shutting down triage is similarly bad for a career. Actually trying following through with either threat is really bad.

Medicine seems to be small world. Our reputations often precede us and you never know when a hospital is going to be called about a reference. But again, we are all adults.
 
Again it's not patient abandonment if you haven't established a relationship with patient. One could very well sue a hospital system/CMG group for big dollars if they took any punitive action.

Abandonment is debatable, I guess. When you leave the ER, ALL of the pts in the ER is your patient.

But if you are willing to throw your career out the window by leaving the ER, then good luck.
 
Correct. No court in the land would force you to work for free as an indentured services. At 7AM I would immediately stop seeing any new patients, dispo or discharge any that were remaining, and walk out the door.

You’d think that but lawyers and lawmakers and their army of advisers are quite a creative bunch
 
Abandonment is debatable, I guess. When you leave the ER, ALL of the pts in the ER is your patient.

But if you are willing to throw your career out the window by leaving the ER, then good luck.
I'm 99% sure that's not true. My state, and I expect most others, Have very specific rules about what is required to establish a doctor-patient relationship. Barring that relationship, there can be no abandonment.

Now can the hospital or your employer sanction you? Very possibly. But it's not necessarily abandonment, state dependent.
 
Again, I don't know how abandonment would be defined. But when I am working alone at night, All of the patients are mine. They were checked out to me, the previous doc put my name on the chart, the nurses have my name on the chart. Seems to be my pt b/c anything that happens to them when I am on shift, I get to treat/chart.

When I leave the ER unattended and every chart references my name, I don't think you would be able to convince a layperson that I didn't have a relationship with them.

But the more imp issue for me would be my conscience. I could not live with myself if I left, a patient codes or needs to be tubed and died. Some EM docs can rationalize this, but in no way can I sleep well at night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
You know what’s awesome? Financial independence. I also never plan to work in such a crap hole that this is an issue. When I moonlit as a resident I did. Life was different. Better now. No cmg private group, private pay and I decide what the mlps do and I have people who will bail me out in 10 mins if someone didn’t show up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I'm 99% sure that's not true. My state, and I expect most others, Have very specific rules about what is required to establish a doctor-patient relationship. Barring that relationship, there can be no abandonment.

Now can the hospital or your employer sanction you? Very possibly. But it's not necessarily abandonment, state dependent.

When you come on to your shift at a single coverage place and take signout, those are your patients. I’ve never worked at a shop that allows patients to sit in the ED without an attending assigned to the patient in the EMR. You are responsible for what happens to them while they are in the ED. Unless they are immediately leaving for an in-patient bed or walking out the door, it would be very wise for you to meet every single one and drop at least a one-liner note. This is especially true for elderly nursing home patients waiting on transport back to their facility, patients waiting on imaging, a second troponin, etc.

Signout is a very high-risk time for EPs. Be careful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
3 hours late leaving? "Signed out to Dr. Colleague pending final results and disposition."
I am not saying be a slave. I am not saying you need to stay for another 12 hrs or some ridiculous amount of time. You can't take every situation to the extreme to make your point.

I am just saying if noone shows up, just escalate the issue and you will not get to even 5 hrs after your shift was supposed to end. Threaten the CMG that you will have to leave or I call the CMO/CEO which usually will solve it. If this doesn't work then tell the staff that you will only do MSE, divert EMS, and take care of critical patients. This will always work. If not, just the CEO you are going to call safe harbor.

To your hypothetical situation, As an ER doc I have to always have a contingency b/c I can never guarantee that I will leave on time. I have a stay at home wife so I don't have to worry but if I was a single parent, I would always have someone as a back up.

As an Er doc, you can always pay someone to be on contingency. I would have paid someone to be avail just in case. As an Er doc, you never know if you could be 3 hrs late from leaving. It can be any situation. I have had a patient come in with a HA that should have been an in/out but didn't see the fever and neck stiffness which is going to take me 3-4 hrs to get her out. Or a Crash patient come in right at the end of my shift. Or a code blue right at the end of my shift.
 
3 hours late leaving? "Signed out to Dr. Colleague pending final results and disposition."

While I too signout CSF results after an end of shift LP, I think that you just completely missed his larger point. The larger point is that you actually have to signout.

EPs working in single coverage shops are absolutely responsible for every patient in the ED including the juicy leftovers from signout. That, and any EP who walks off after a shift without giving proper handoff of their patients is making a big, big mistake. Nobody is saying that you need to stay for a double hitter, but at least be able to show a good faith effort that reasonable efforts were made to insure patient safety.

This really shouldn’t be all that foreign or controversial.
 
When you come on to your shift at a single coverage place and take signout, those are your patients. I’ve never worked at a shop that allows patients to sit in the ED without an attending assigned to the patient in the EMR. You are responsible for what happens to them while they are in the ED. Unless they are immediately leaving for an in-patient bed or walking out the door, it would be very wise for you to meet every single one and drop at least a one-liner note. This is especially true for elderly nursing home patients waiting on transport back to their facility, patients waiting on imaging, a second troponin, etc.

Signout is a very high-risk time for EPs. Be careful.
Assigned in the EMR does not mean a doctor-patient relationship has been established.

Taking sign out for patients the previous doctor has seen falls under the same umbrella as being on call for your group and dealing with a patient you haven't seen before.
 
Assigned in the EMR does not mean a doctor-patient relationship has been established.

Taking sign out for patients the previous doctor has seen falls under the same umbrella as being on call for your group and dealing with a patient you haven't seen before.

Assuming you practice EM, you may need to familiarize yourself with the legal definitions of abandonment as it pertains to EM and your own collage’s position statements on sign outs. This is from ACEP:


“EDs provide clinical care 24 hours a day and physicians work in shifts. There is a period around the time of shift change when providers transfer information, primary authority, and responsibility for patient care.22,23 Other aspects of the care environment, such as diversion status, boarding patients, pending transfers, equipment, and personnel issues, are also sometimes discussed. Handoffs can be a source of liability and error but also an opportunity for rescue when the re-evaluation of a case from a fresh perspective may result in preventing or recovering from an adverse event.11,24-29”

Moreover, all of the people claiming that you must “do something” to establish a physician-patient relationship are missing the important point that simply agreeing to assume care is the “doing something.” By accepting your partner’s sign outs you are agreeing to assume care of the patient and establishing a relationship. This from the AMA Journal of Ethics:


However, a patient-physician relationship is generally formed when a physician affirmatively acts in a patient’s case by examining, diagnosing, treating, or agreeing to do so [5]. Once the physician consensually enters into a relationship with a patient in any of these ways, a legal contract is formed in which the physician owes a duty to that patient to continue to treat or properly terminate the relationship.

Under your logic, EPs could absolve themselves from liability by simply not seeing their sign outs. While every state frames physician-patient relationships a little differently, a general trend in most state’s case law is that EPs have a heightened responsibility since patients in extremis cannot be reasonably expected to find an alternative provider. From an EMTALA perspective, refusing to stabilize to a patient in your department that was signed out to you can also be a problem. Fortunately, such issues generally become a problem for an EP when a patient deteriorates or suffers some damages which is generally pretty rare. However, you would be wise to follow ACEPs guidelines that I provided if you are interested in maximizing safety at sign out.
 
Last edited:
Assuming you practice EM, you may need to familiarize yourself with the legal definitions of abandonment as it pertains to EM and your own collage’s position statements on sign outs. This is from ACEP:


“EDs provide clinical care 24 hours a day and physicians work in shifts. There is a period around the time of shift change when providers transfer information, primary authority, and responsibility for patient care.22,23 Other aspects of the care environment, such as diversion status, boarding patients, pending transfers, equipment, and personnel issues, are also sometimes discussed. Handoffs can be a source of liability and error but also an opportunity for rescue when the re-evaluation of a case from a fresh perspective may result in preventing or recovering from an adverse event.11,24-29”

Moreover, all of the people claiming that you must “do something” to establish a physician-patient relationship are missing the important point that simply agreeing to assume care is the “doing something.” By accepting your partner’s sign outs you are agreeing to assume care of the patient and establishing a relationship. This from the AMA Journal of Ethics:


However, a patient-physician relationship is generally formed when a physician affirmatively acts in a patient’s case by examining, diagnosing, treating, or agreeing to do so [5]. Once the physician consensually enters into a relationship with a patient in any of these ways, a legal contract is formed in which the physician owes a duty to that patient to continue to treat or properly terminate the relationship.

Under your logic, EPs could absolve themselves from liability by simply not seeing their sign outs. While every state frames physician-patient relationships a little differently, a general trend in most state’s case law is that EPs have a heightened responsibility since patients in extremis cannot be reasonably expected to find an alternative provider. From an EMTALA perspective, refusing to stabilize to a patient in your department that was signed out to you can also be a problem. Fortunately, such issues generally become a problem for an EP when a patient deteriorates or suffers some damages which is generally pretty rare. However, you would be wise to follow ACEPs guidelines that I provided if you are interested in maximizing safety at sign out.
I think you misunderstood my post.

I'm FM. When I am on call and one of my partner's patients calls me, even though I have never seen them, I am responsible for what happens with that phone encounter.

I have never seen the patient, haven't done an exam, but because I'm taking call for the doctor who has that counts.

Same thing with taking sign out from another EP. If the patient is just waiting for a lab to result, you see it and OK the discharge (even if you don't go tell the patient yourself), the patient becomes your responsibility.

Conversely, just because they are sitting in the ED waiting room and get assigned to you by the EMR doesn't mean they are your responsibility absent any other factors.

Now your state may be different, but mine has specifically addressed everything I've said.
 
But in this case there is no "sign out". There is simply a patient showing up in the lobby after our scheduled duty hours have elapsed. There is no patient abandonment, because their is no affirmative initiation of a patient relationship, and no sign out from another doctor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top