- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi,
I interviewed earlier this month at a school where only one interview is given, and I had a medical student interviewer. Everything went well until towards the end when he asked about my verbal score which is much lower than the rest of my scores. I've always had a hard time trying to explain a poor score or justify myself without sounding as though i'm just making excuses, so I got really nervous and started fumbling with my words. I didn't seem to be making much sense. After the interview, he gave me his email address incase I had any questions, so when I got home, I decided to write him. I explained that I got really nervous and thought I didn't do a good job expressing my rationale for the poor score. So, I was using this opportunity to do so. I expected him to at least write back and give me some reassurance like saying, oh don't worry, that's okay, or I understand, but he never wrote back.
I also sent a letter of interest through email to the associate dean of admissions. I interviewed on a tuesday and she had mentioned that the committee will meet and discuss our files the following Monday. I planned on sending it by regular mail, but because I finished the letter late, I feared she may not get to read it before the committee meeting if I didn't send it by email. Anyways, in the letter, I expressed my strong interest in the school, highlighting what I like about it, and delved a bit into my interview day. I mentioned being nervous when discussing my lower MCAT score just to get it out there, but just as the med student interviewer, I've gotten no response.
Is this typical or is it unreasonable to expect a reply to letters sent through emails to interviewers or dean of admissions?. I should hear back from the school by January 15th so I'll keep my fingers crossed and hope I didn't screw myself over. Perhaps I shouldn't have addressed the nervousness and fumbling at all, who knows my interviewer may have forgotten about it and I drew more attention to it. Sometimes, we're our own worst critic and might feel bad about an interview when infact it went okay. It's just hard because you never know what your interviewer is thinking.
Any thots?
I interviewed earlier this month at a school where only one interview is given, and I had a medical student interviewer. Everything went well until towards the end when he asked about my verbal score which is much lower than the rest of my scores. I've always had a hard time trying to explain a poor score or justify myself without sounding as though i'm just making excuses, so I got really nervous and started fumbling with my words. I didn't seem to be making much sense. After the interview, he gave me his email address incase I had any questions, so when I got home, I decided to write him. I explained that I got really nervous and thought I didn't do a good job expressing my rationale for the poor score. So, I was using this opportunity to do so. I expected him to at least write back and give me some reassurance like saying, oh don't worry, that's okay, or I understand, but he never wrote back.
I also sent a letter of interest through email to the associate dean of admissions. I interviewed on a tuesday and she had mentioned that the committee will meet and discuss our files the following Monday. I planned on sending it by regular mail, but because I finished the letter late, I feared she may not get to read it before the committee meeting if I didn't send it by email. Anyways, in the letter, I expressed my strong interest in the school, highlighting what I like about it, and delved a bit into my interview day. I mentioned being nervous when discussing my lower MCAT score just to get it out there, but just as the med student interviewer, I've gotten no response.
Is this typical or is it unreasonable to expect a reply to letters sent through emails to interviewers or dean of admissions?. I should hear back from the school by January 15th so I'll keep my fingers crossed and hope I didn't screw myself over. Perhaps I shouldn't have addressed the nervousness and fumbling at all, who knows my interviewer may have forgotten about it and I drew more attention to it. Sometimes, we're our own worst critic and might feel bad about an interview when infact it went okay. It's just hard because you never know what your interviewer is thinking.
Any thots?